Toulmin의 논증의 옹호와 교육적 적용에 대한 탐색 = The Advocation and Educational Application about Toulmin's Argument Model

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this study is to criticize the deductive argument and inductive argument of a kind of classical logic, and advocate the Toulmin's argument model, the informal logic among a contemporary logic. In this article, We emphasized that Toulmin's argument model was justified by their validity and soundness on account of the interactions of elements of argument, and investigated with the educational aplication of education, the strategies of application's goals, and the status of constructivism philosophy based on Toulmin's argument model.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구의 목적은 전통적인 고전 논리학의 하나인 연역 논증과 귀납 논증을 비판하고, 그들을 포괄할 수 있는 현대 논리학의 하나인 비형식 논증인 Toulmin의 논증 모형을 옹호하고, 그러한 비형식 논증의 교육적 가능성을 탐색한다. 이 연구를 통해서, 우리는 Toulmin의 논증 모형을 구성하는 많은 요소들은 서로 상호작용하면서 논증의 타당성과 건전성을 확보함을 강조하였다. 또한 Toulmin의 논증모형의 문제점을 점검하고 개선점을 제안하였다. 끝으로 Toulmin의 논증에 대한 교육적 적용필요성, 하나의 일반적인 사용 전략과 구성주의적 철학적 위치를 탐색하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 하병학, "토론과 설득을 위한 우리들의 논리" 철학과 현실사 2001

2 김기철, "초등학생의 논증하는 글쓰기 능력 위계 연구" 공주교육대학교 교육대학원 2005

3 Crosswhite, J., "이성의 수사학-글쓰기와 논증의 매력" 고려대학교 출판부 2001

4 유지현, "온라인 토론 학습에서 논증모델의 활용이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 논증기술 향상에 미치는 효과" 이화여자 대학교 2003

5 Vigotstsky, L. S., "사회속의 정신: 고등 심리과정의 발당" 성원사 1994

6 박준호, "비형식 논리학의 논증과 논증 평가 개념" 범한철학회 34 (34): 151-175, 2004

7 백춘현, "민사고 논술(입문)" 도서출판 민사고 2005

8 김복순, "대학 말하기, 하, 토론의 방법" 국학자료원 2007

9 Renkema. J., "담화연구의 기초" 한국문화사 1997

10 박영목, "논증개념의 체계화 연구" 22 : 17-42, 2005

11 조규락, "논증 스캐폴드와 문제의 유형이 논증의 질,문제해결 성취도 및 집단의 효과성에 미치는 효과" 한국교육공학회 18 (18): 55-82, 2002

12 김인애, "논증 도식 지도를 통한 논술 교수-학습 방안 연구" 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 2007

13 Irving,M. C., "논리학 입문" 이론 1995

14 Ruby, L., "논리적으로 사고하는 기술" 서광사 1994

15 김태오, "구성주의 패러다임의 측면에서 본 작문 이론의 전개 동향-인지구성주의 작문이론과 사회 구성주의 작문이론을 중심으로-" 2 : 62-95, 1999

16 임태섭, "광고 메시지의 질적 접근" 21 : 327-366, 1993

17 강순민, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특징" 한국교원대학교 2004

18 Driver, R., "Young people's images of science" Open university Press 2000

19 Siegel, H., "Why should educators care about argumentation?" 17 (17): 159-176, 1995

20 Duschil, R., "Understanding dialogic argumentation" 1999

21 Fitzgerald, J., "Towards knowledge in writing: illustration from revision studies" Springer Verlag 1992

22 Toulmin, S., "The uses of Arguments" Cambridge university press 1958

23 Kuhn, D., "The skills of argument" Cambridge University press 1991

24 Collins, A., "The logic of plausible reasoning : A core theory" 13 : 1-49, 1989

25 Johnson, Ralph H., "The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic" 13 : 265-272, 1999

26 Sandoval, W. A., "The Quality od Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations" 23 (23): 23-55, 2005

27 Grűnbaum, Adolf, "The Limitations of Deductivism" University of California Press 1988

28 Willams, J. M., "The Craft of Argument, (3rd ed.)" Pearson Education, Inc 2007

29 Heeren, J. K., "Teaching chemistry by the Socratic Method" 67 (67): 330-331, 1990

30 Lizotte, D. J., "Teacher practices that support students' construction of scientific explanations in middle school classrooms" Taylor & Francis 2004

31 Freeman, J. B., "Systematizing Toulmin's Warrants: An Epistemic Approach" 19 : 331-346, 2005

32 Kelly, G. J., "Students' reasoning about electricity : Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis" 20 : 849-871, 1988

33 Searle, J. R., "Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of language" Cambridge university press 1969

34 Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE" 22 : 797-818, 2000

35 Gable, D., "Research on problem solving in chemistry, In Handbook of research on science teaching and learning" Macmillan 301-326, 1984

36 Lythcott, J., "Qualitative Research: From Methods to Conclusions" 74 (74): 445-460, 1990

37 Davis, E. A., "Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection : Generic and directed prompts" 12 (12): 91-142, 2003

38 Hanson, N., "Patterns of Discovery" Cambridge University Press 1957

39 Terry, D. R., "Modern Debate Case Techniques, In Structure of argument in debate" National Textbook Company 95-101, 1970

40 Duschl, R. A., "Making the nature of science explicit, In Improving science education: The contribution of research" Open University Press 187-206, 2000

41 Berland, L. K., "Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation" 93 : 26-55, 2009

42 Chin, C., "Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches" 37 : 109-138, 2000

43 Novak, J. D., "Learning how to learn" Cambridge University Press 1984

44 Van Eemeren, F. H., "Fundamentals of Argumentation, theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" Lawrence Erlbaum 1996

45 Sandoval, W.A., "Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry" 88 : 345-372, 2004

46 Blair, J. Anthony, "Everyday Argumentation from an informal Logic Perspective, In Readings in Argumentation" Foris Publications 357-375, 1992

47 Kelly, G. J., "Epistemic levels in argument : An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing" 86 : 314-342, 2002

48 Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Doing the lesson” or “doing science”- Argument in high school genetics" 84 (84): 287-312, 2000

49 Pontecorvo, C., "Discussing and reasoning: The role of argument in knowledge construction, In Learning and Instruction: European research in an international context" Pergamon 239-250, 1987

50 Trapp. R., "Discovering the world through debate(3rd Ed.)" IDEA Press Books 2005

51 Forman, E. A., "Discourse, intersubjectivity and the development of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian approach, In Children's development within social contexts: Metatheoretical, theoretical and methodological issues (Vol. 1)" Erlbaum 143-159, 1992

52 Veerman, A., "Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments" Kluwer Academic 117-143, 2003

53 Schwarz, B. B., "Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity" 12 (12): 219-256, 2003

54 Cros, D., "Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry" 10 : 331-336, 1987

55 de Vries, E., "Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions" 11 (11): 63-103, 2002

56 Scardamalia, M., "Computer support for knowledge-building communities" 3 : 265-283, 1994

57 Ricke, R. D., "Argumentation and decision making Process (2nd Ed.)" Scott, Foresman and Company 1984

58 Tindale, J. H., "Argumentation and debate textbooks, An overview of content and focus" 35 (35): 185-195, 1999

59 Freeley, J. A., "Argumentation and Debate" Wordsworth Publishing Company 2005

60 Lampert, M., "Appreciating the complexity of teaching and learning in school" 11 : 365-368, 2002

61 Clark, D. B., "Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personally-seeded discussions" 2005

62 Toulmin, S, "An introduction to reasoning(2nd ed.)" Macmillian Publishing Company 1984

63 Chinn, C. A., ""The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning"" 100 (100): 315-368, 1988

64 Driver, R., ""Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms" 84 : 287-312, 2000

65 Lythcott, J., ""Aristotelian" was given as the answer, but what was the question?" 53 (53): 428-431, 1985