미국의 소송대체분쟁해결제도(ADR)의 현황과 그 도입방안

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the U.S.A. alternative dispute resolution(ADR) is highly developed. Contemporary ADR is in large part the result of the 1976 Pound Conference, which drew attention to alternatives to traditional dispute resolution. Since the conference, significant progress has been made in ADR generally and the use of mediation specifically.
Professor Sander's speech on multidoor-court house at Pound Conference triggered ADR movement inside the courts. Judicial settlement conference, judicial arbitration and mediation are court ADR. Many court promoted mediation as a means of reducing time and costs to resolve civil disputes.
After the conference, the US Department of Justice's Law Enforcement Assistance Administration provided funding for pilot programs on Neighborhood Justice Centers in cities such as Atlanta, Los Angeles, Kansas City, Honolulu and Dallas. The programs aimed to resolution of minor disputes between neighbors. The Neighborhood Justice Centers have originally developed from the Community Justice Movement in the late 1960s and early 1970 as a part of the community empowerment movement. The most complete manifestations of community justice as empowerment and dispute resolution were the Community Boards established in San Franscisco. In 1976, the American Bar Association reported fifteen neighborhood Justice Centers across the nation, in 2008, the National Association for Community Mediation reported that the number had increased to approximately 550 centers.
The developments of ADR, especially the Neighborhood Justice Centers in the U.S.A. suggests good lessons and informations to Korean legal system planning to develop ADR.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hanycz, Colleen M, "Whither Community Justice? The Rise of Court- Connected Mediation in the United States" 25 : 167-, 2007

2 DeDino, Nathan K, "When Fences Aren't Enough: The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Disputes between Neighbors" 18 : 887-, 2003

3 Stulberg, Joseph B, "Training Interveners for ADR Process" 81 : 977-, 1993

4 "The New York State Unified Court System Division of Court Operations, Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program" 2006

5 Primm, Edith B, "The Neighborhood Justice Center Movement" 81 : 1067-, 1993

6 Sander, Frank E. A, "The Future of ADR" 2000 : 3-, 2000

7 Donahue, Thomas, "Survey: ADR Use Increasing, 15 Altern. High Costs of Litig" 66 : 75-, 1997

8 Henry, James F, "Some Reflections on ADR" 63-, 2000

9 Stempel, Jeffrey, "Reflections on Judicial ADR and the Multi-Door Courthouse at Twenty: Fait Accompli, Failed Overture, or Fledgling Adulthood" 11 : 297-, 1996

10 Kovach, Kimberlee K, "Privatization of Dispute Resolution: In the Sprit of Pound, but Mission Incomplete: Lessons Learned and a Possible Blueprint for the Future" 48 : 1003-, 2007

11 Stone, Katherine V.W, "Private Justice: The Law of Alternative Dispute Resolution"

12 Comments, "Peer mediation Programs" 323-, 1993

13 Lipsky, David B, "Patterns of ADR Use in Corporate Disputes" 54 : 1999

14 Hensler, Deborah R, "Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement is Reshaping Our Legal System" 108 : 165-, 2004

15 Haft, William S, "Note, Peer Mediation in Schools: Expectations and Evaluations" 3 : 213-, 1998

16 Cole, McEwen, "Mediation Law, 2nd ed"

17 Kovach, Kimberlee K, "Mediation"

18 Resnik, Judith, "Managerial Judges" 96 : 374-, 1982

19 Lieberman, Jethro K, "Lessons from the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement" 53 : 424-427, 1986

20 Hedeen, Timothy, "Institutionalizing Community Mediation: Can Dispute Resolution "of, by, and for the People" Long Endure?" 108 : 265-, 2004

21 Thompson, Peter N, "Enforcing Rights Generated In Court-Connected Mediation-Tension Between The Aspirations of a Private Facilitative Process and the Reality of Public Adversarial Justice" 19 : 509-, 2004

22 Goldberg, "Dispute Resolution, 4th ed"

23 Riskin, Leonard L, "Dispute Resolution and Lawyers, 2nd ed"

24 Johns, Tricia S, "Conflict Resolution Educations, The Field, The Findings, and The Future, Mediation" 22 : 233-, 2004

25 Weiss, Tricia S, "Conflict Resolution Education: The Field, The Findings, and the Future" 22 : 233-, 2004

26 Klein, Nancy S, "Community Mediation and the District Court" 75 : 158-,

27 Hedeen, Timothy, "Community Mediation and the Court System: The Ties That Bind" 17 : 351-, 2000

28 Mcgillis, Daniel, "Community Mediation Programs"

29 Shonholz, Raymond, "Community Mediation Centers: Renewing the Civic Mission for the Twenty-First Century" 17 : 2000

30 Rayburn, Jill Richey, "Alternative Dispute Resolution Symposium: Neighborhood Justice Centers: Community Use of ADR - Does It Really Work?" 26 : 1197-, 1996

31 Ware, Stephen J, "Alternative Dispute Resolution"

32 Sternlight, Jean R, "ADR is Here: Preliminary Reflections on where it Fits in a System of Justice" 3 : 289-, 2003

33 Phipps, Louis, "ADR in the Courts: Progress, Problems, and Possibilities" 108 : 327-, 2004

34 Sabatino, Jack M, "ADR as Litigation Lite: Procedural and Evidentiary Norms Embedded within Alternative Dispute Resolution" 1289-, 1998

35 Marcus, Daniel, "ADR and the Federal Government" 66 : 709-, 2001

36 Bryce, C. Michael, "ADR Education From a Litigator/Educator Perspective" 81 : 337-, 2007

37 Galanter, Marc, "A World without Trials" 7-, 2006

38 Coy, Patrick G, "A Stage Model of Social Movement Co-Option: Community Mediation in the United States" 46 : 421-,