RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    중소기업의 기술혁신 결정요인에 관한 실증연구 = An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Technological Innovation of Korean SMEs

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103793063

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Many researchers have recognized that technological innovation of small and medium-sized firms is related positively with financial performance, competitive advantage, and sustainable growth. Consequently, most of small and medium-sized firms were focused on the technological innovation activities. And many academic persons have strived to find out success factors of technological innovation empirically.


    * Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Keimyung University.
    ** Department of Business Administration, Keimyung University.
    *** Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Keimyung University.

    For example, Souitaris(2001) empirically discovered strategic factors that are influence on technological innovation in Greece manufacturing small and medium-sized firms. Research results showed that innovation rate of small and medium-sized firms related with new technology plan, CEO’s risk taking intention, future-oriented customer relation management, high competitive business environment. But definition of corporate strategy, communication of corporate strategy, time scope of corporate strategy, formalized decision making, the number of decision makers, CEO’s locus of control, recovery period of technology investment capital, CEO’s age were not significantly related with innovation rate of small and medium-sized firms. Keizer et al.(2002) also empirically analysed determinants of technological innovation. Consequently, they revealed that supporting fund for innovation, collaboration with knowledge center, R&D investment were positively and significantly related with technology innovation efforts. Futhermore, cooperation with other companies, manager’s education level, and recovery period of technology investment capital also influenced on technology innovation efforts of small and medium-sized firms. Becheikh et al.(2006) have reviewed systematically 108 research papers on the technology innovation. Resultantly, they detected that internal factors such as firm characteristics, global strategy, organizational structure, control activities, corporate culture, CEO, and asset and strategy of functional divisions, and contextual factors such as industry, location, network, knowledge and technology acquisition, government and public policy, and regional industry culture were positively and significantly related with technology innovation.
    But past studies have following limitations. First, most of studies dealt with large companies rather than small and medium-sized firms. Second, previous studies did not show the consistent research results in validating success factors of technological innovation in small and medium-sized firms. Third, previous empirical studies did not interest in comprehensive analysis of determinants of technological innovation.
    This study concluded internal and external determinants of technology innovation of SMEs based on the studies of Souitaris(2001), Keizer et al.(2002), Becheikh et al.(2006), Thamhain(2003), Panne et al.(2003), and Adams et al.(2006). Internal factors include size, innovation capability, CEO’s characteristics, strategy, organizational structure, and organizational culture. External factors include technological opportunities, external network, government’s policy support.
    Therefore this study aims at investigating the determinants of technological innovation empirically in Korean small and medium-sized firms. A questionnaire was developed to measure the above variables. Size was measured by the number of total employee. Innovation capability was measured by the ratio of R&D personnel compare with total employee in recent 3 years. CEO’s characteristics reflect the Duncan(1972)’s innovation acceptance(5 point scale). Strategy was measured by Miller(1988)’s innovation differentiation using 6 questionnaires(5 point scale). Organization structure was Govindarajan(1988)’ 6 questionnaires(5 point scale), and organizational culture was B...
    번역하기

    Many researchers have recognized that technological innovation of small and medium-sized firms is related positively with financial performance, competitive advantage, and sustainable growth. Consequently, most of small and medium-sized firms were foc...

    Many researchers have recognized that technological innovation of small and medium-sized firms is related positively with financial performance, competitive advantage, and sustainable growth. Consequently, most of small and medium-sized firms were focused on the technological innovation activities. And many academic persons have strived to find out success factors of technological innovation empirically.


    * Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Keimyung University.
    ** Department of Business Administration, Keimyung University.
    *** Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Keimyung University.

    For example, Souitaris(2001) empirically discovered strategic factors that are influence on technological innovation in Greece manufacturing small and medium-sized firms. Research results showed that innovation rate of small and medium-sized firms related with new technology plan, CEO’s risk taking intention, future-oriented customer relation management, high competitive business environment. But definition of corporate strategy, communication of corporate strategy, time scope of corporate strategy, formalized decision making, the number of decision makers, CEO’s locus of control, recovery period of technology investment capital, CEO’s age were not significantly related with innovation rate of small and medium-sized firms. Keizer et al.(2002) also empirically analysed determinants of technological innovation. Consequently, they revealed that supporting fund for innovation, collaboration with knowledge center, R&D investment were positively and significantly related with technology innovation efforts. Futhermore, cooperation with other companies, manager’s education level, and recovery period of technology investment capital also influenced on technology innovation efforts of small and medium-sized firms. Becheikh et al.(2006) have reviewed systematically 108 research papers on the technology innovation. Resultantly, they detected that internal factors such as firm characteristics, global strategy, organizational structure, control activities, corporate culture, CEO, and asset and strategy of functional divisions, and contextual factors such as industry, location, network, knowledge and technology acquisition, government and public policy, and regional industry culture were positively and significantly related with technology innovation.
    But past studies have following limitations. First, most of studies dealt with large companies rather than small and medium-sized firms. Second, previous studies did not show the consistent research results in validating success factors of technological innovation in small and medium-sized firms. Third, previous empirical studies did not interest in comprehensive analysis of determinants of technological innovation.
    This study concluded internal and external determinants of technology innovation of SMEs based on the studies of Souitaris(2001), Keizer et al.(2002), Becheikh et al.(2006), Thamhain(2003), Panne et al.(2003), and Adams et al.(2006). Internal factors include size, innovation capability, CEO’s characteristics, strategy, organizational structure, and organizational culture. External factors include technological opportunities, external network, government’s policy support.
    Therefore this study aims at investigating the determinants of technological innovation empirically in Korean small and medium-sized firms. A questionnaire was developed to measure the above variables. Size was measured by the number of total employee. Innovation capability was measured by the ratio of R&D personnel compare with total employee in recent 3 years. CEO’s characteristics reflect the Duncan(1972)’s innovation acceptance(5 point scale). Strategy was measured by Miller(1988)’s innovation differentiation using 6 questionnaires(5 point scale). Organization structure was Govindarajan(1988)’ 6 questionnaires(5 point scale), and organizational culture was B...

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구는 중소기업의 기술혁신에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 체계적으로 규명하고 이들 요인들이 어떤 효과를 가지는지를 실증적으로 밝히려는 목적을 가지고 있다. 기존연구들을 바탕으로 기술혁신 영향요인을 내부요인(규모, 혁신능력, 최고경영자의 특성, 전략, 조직구조, 문화)과 외부요인(기술적 기회, 외부네트워크 및 정부정책지원)으로 구분하여 실증분석을 시도하고 있다. 대구지역 150개 제조 중소기업으로부터 자료를 수집하여 분석한 결과 중소기업의 규모, 혁신역량, 최고경영자의 혁신수용성, 분권화, 기술적 기회 등이 기술혁신에 긍정적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 중소기업의 전략, 문화, 네트워크 및 정부정책지원 등은 유의한 효과를 가지지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문에서는 실증분석 결과가 가지는 이론적 및 실무적 시사점, 한계점 및 향후 연구방향 등도 함께 논의하고 있다.
    번역하기

    본 연구는 중소기업의 기술혁신에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 체계적으로 규명하고 이들 요인들이 어떤 효과를 가지는지를 실증적으로 밝히려는 목적을 가지고 있다. 기존연구들을 바탕으로 ...

    본 연구는 중소기업의 기술혁신에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 체계적으로 규명하고 이들 요인들이 어떤 효과를 가지는지를 실증적으로 밝히려는 목적을 가지고 있다. 기존연구들을 바탕으로 기술혁신 영향요인을 내부요인(규모, 혁신능력, 최고경영자의 특성, 전략, 조직구조, 문화)과 외부요인(기술적 기회, 외부네트워크 및 정부정책지원)으로 구분하여 실증분석을 시도하고 있다. 대구지역 150개 제조 중소기업으로부터 자료를 수집하여 분석한 결과 중소기업의 규모, 혁신역량, 최고경영자의 혁신수용성, 분권화, 기술적 기회 등이 기술혁신에 긍정적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 중소기업의 전략, 문화, 네트워크 및 정부정책지원 등은 유의한 효과를 가지지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문에서는 실증분석 결과가 가지는 이론적 및 실무적 시사점, 한계점 및 향후 연구방향 등도 함께 논의하고 있다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영조, "최고경영자의 전략적 리더십, 연구개발 투자, 인사제도와 기술혁신성과의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 31 (31): 49-83, 2007

    2 안두순, "중소기업 기술혁신 지원을 위한 몇 가지 명제 - 애로요인 조사 자료와 문헌 서베이 결과를 중심으로" 한독경상학회 22 (22): 2-2, 2004

    3 박상문, "외부자원 활용이 벤처기업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 28 (28): 181-206, 2006

    4 송위진, "산업별 기술혁신패턴 비교 분석" 123 : 152-165, 2000

    5 송광선, "기술혁신의 영향요인에 관한 연구: 중소기업을 대상으로" 한국중소기업학회 17 (17): 169-192, 1995

    6 김왕동, "기술능력의 축적과정 및 영향요인에 대한 연구: 중소 반도체 장비 제조업체를 중심으로" 한국지식경영학회 3 (3): 49-69, 2002

    7 조선배, "관광호텔의 시장지향성과 경영성과: 수도권 특등급 관광호텔의 차별화전략, 저원가전략의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 57-70, 2008

    8 성태경, "고기술산업과 저기술산업에서 기업의 혁신활동 결정요인 비교 분석" 한국산업경제학회 18 (18): 339-360, 2005

    9 Heygate, R, "Why are We Bungling Process Innovation?" 2 : 130-141, 1996

    10 Porter, M. E, "UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage" 3 : 323-336, 2003

    1 김영조, "최고경영자의 전략적 리더십, 연구개발 투자, 인사제도와 기술혁신성과의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 31 (31): 49-83, 2007

    2 안두순, "중소기업 기술혁신 지원을 위한 몇 가지 명제 - 애로요인 조사 자료와 문헌 서베이 결과를 중심으로" 한독경상학회 22 (22): 2-2, 2004

    3 박상문, "외부자원 활용이 벤처기업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 28 (28): 181-206, 2006

    4 송위진, "산업별 기술혁신패턴 비교 분석" 123 : 152-165, 2000

    5 송광선, "기술혁신의 영향요인에 관한 연구: 중소기업을 대상으로" 한국중소기업학회 17 (17): 169-192, 1995

    6 김왕동, "기술능력의 축적과정 및 영향요인에 대한 연구: 중소 반도체 장비 제조업체를 중심으로" 한국지식경영학회 3 (3): 49-69, 2002

    7 조선배, "관광호텔의 시장지향성과 경영성과: 수도권 특등급 관광호텔의 차별화전략, 저원가전략의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 57-70, 2008

    8 성태경, "고기술산업과 저기술산업에서 기업의 혁신활동 결정요인 비교 분석" 한국산업경제학회 18 (18): 339-360, 2005

    9 Heygate, R, "Why are We Bungling Process Innovation?" 2 : 130-141, 1996

    10 Porter, M. E, "UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage" 3 : 323-336, 2003

    11 De Propris, L, "Types of Innovation and Inter-Firm Co-Operation" 14 (14): 337-353, 2002

    12 Larsen,, P, "The Strategy Process in Growing Companies" 24 (24): 53-67, 1998

    13 Hall, R. H, "The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources" 13 (13): 135-144, 1992

    14 Kotabe, M, "The Role of Strategic Alliances in High Technology New Product Development" 16 : 621-636, 1995

    15 Audretsch, D, "The Role of Small Firms in U.S. Biotechnology Clusters" 17 (17): 3-15, 2001

    16 Saleh, S. D, "The Management of Innovation: Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Climate" 40 (40): 14-21, 1993

    17 Vrakking, W. J, "The Innovative Organization" 23 (23): 94-102, 1990

    18 Rothwell, R, "The Importance of Technology Transfer, in Barriers to Growth in Small Firms" Routledge 87-103, 1989

    19 Lipparini, A, "The Glue and the Pieces: Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Small-firm Networks" 9 : 125-140, 1994

    20 McEvily, S. K, "The Global Acquisition, Leverage, and Protection of Technological Competencies" 25 (25): 713-722, 2004

    21 Sternberg, R, "The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behaviour of European Firms?" 77 (77): 364-382, 2001

    22 Sung, T. K, "The Evolution of a Technological System: The Case of CNC Machine Tools in Korea" 13 (13): 435-460, 2003

    23 Freeman, C, "The Economics of Industrial Innovation" Pinte 1997

    24 Majumdar, S. K, "The Determinants of Investment in New Technology: An Examination of Alternative Hypotheses" 50 (50): 153-165, 1995

    25 Papadakis, V, "The Chief Executive Officer as Corporate Champion of Technological Innovation: An Empirical Investigation" 10 (10): 89-98, 1998

    26 Li, H, "The Adoption of Agency Business Activity, Product Innovation, and Performance in Chinese Technology Ventures" 23 (23): 469-490, 2002

    27 Souitaris, V, "Technological Trajectories Moderators of Firm-level Determinants of Innovation" 31 : 877-898, 2002

    28 Rothwell, R, "Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Success Factors for the 1990s" 22 (22): 221-239, 1992

    29 Panne, G, "Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review" 7 (7): 309-338, 2003

    30 Ragatz, G, "Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development" 14 (14): 190-202, 1997

    31 Lager, T, "Success Factors for Improvement and Innovation of Process Technology in Process Industry" 13 (13): 158-164, 2002

    32 Naffziger, D. W, "Strategy in Small Businesses" 1999

    33 Hill, C. W. L, "Strategies for Exploiting Technological Innovations: When and When not to License" 3 (3): 428-441, 1992

    34 Roper, S, "Strategic Initiatives and Small business Perfomance" 9 : 353-364, 1997

    35 Souitaris, V, "Strategic Influences of Technological Innovation in Greece" 12 : 131-147, 2001

    36 Pucik, V, "Strategic Alliances, Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage: the HRM Agenda" 27 (27): 77-93, 1988

    37 Schoomhoven, C, "Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms" 35 (35): 177-207, 1990

    38 Acs, Z. J, "Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Technology, and Globalization: Introduction to a Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy" 9 (9): 1-6, 1997

    39 Joyce, P, "Small Firms: Contributions to Economic Regeneration" The Institute for Small Business Affairs 1996

    40 Hoffman, K, "Small Firms, R&D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A literature Review" 18 (18): 39-55, 1998

    41 Ali A, "Selecting Product Development Project: Pioneering Versus Incremental Innovation Strategies" 39 : 255-274, 1993

    42 Freel, M. S, "Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity" 32 (32): 751-770, 2003

    43 Miller, D, "Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications" 31 (31): 280-308, 1988

    44 Salavou H, "Radical Product Innovations in SMEs: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation" 12 (12): 94-108, 2003

    45 Karlsson, C, "Product Innovation in Small and Large Enterprises" 10 (10): 31-46, 1998

    46 Calantone, R. J, "Organizational, Technical and Marketing Antecedents for Successful New Product Development" 23 (23): 337-349, 1993

    47 Damanpour, F, "Organizational Size and Innovation" 13 (13): 375-402, 1992

    48 Wolfe, R. A, "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions" 31 (31): 405-430, 1994

    49 Barney, J. B, "Organizational Economics: Towards a New Paradigm for Studying and Understanding Organizations" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1986

    50 Miller, D, "Organization: A Quantum View" Prentice- Hall 1982

    51 Guangzhou Hu, A, "Organization, Monitoring Intensity, and Innovation Performance in Chinese Industry" 12 (12): 117-144, 2003

    52 Lambe, C. J, "National Account Management: Large Account Selling or Buyer-seller Alliance?" 4 : 61-74, 1997

    53 Anderson, N. R, "Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of Team Climate Inventory" 19 (19): 235-258, 1998

    54 Verhees, J. H. M, "Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation and Performance in Small Firms" 42 (42): 134-155, 2004

    55 Souder, W. M. E, "Managing New Product Innovations" Lexington Books 1987

    56 Thamhain, H. J, "Managing Innovative R&D Teams" 33 (33): 297-311, 2003

    57 Birchall, D. W, "Managing Innovation in SMEs: A Comparison of Companies in the UK, France and Portugal" 12 (12): 291-305, 1996

    58 Bedrock, R, "Managing Innovation for Survival and Growth: Rotunda PLC-a case in point" 1993

    59 Shefer, D, "Local Milieu and Innovation: Some Empirical Results" 32 : 185-200, 1998

    60 Becheikh, N, "Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the literature from 1993~2003" 26 (26): 644-664, 2006

    61 Michie, J, "Labour Market Deregulation, ‘flexibility’ and Innovation" 27 (27): 123-143, 2003

    62 Tsai, W, "Knowledge transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance" 44 (44): 996-1004, 2001

    63 Bell M, "Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries" 26 (26): 1715-1734, 1999

    64 Shan, W, "Interfirm Cooperation and Startup Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry" 15 (15): 387-394, 1994

    65 Khan, A. M, "Innovative and Noninnovative Small Firms: Types and Characteristics" 35 (35): 597-606, 1989

    66 Hurley, R. F, "Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination" 62 (62): 42-54, 1998

    67 West, F, "Innovation at Work: Psychological Perspectives" 4 : 15-30, 1990

    68 Huiban, J, "Innovation and the Quality of Labour Factor: An Empirical Investigation in the French Food Industry" 10 (10): 389-400, 1998

    69 Jimenez-Jimenez, D, "Innovation and Human Resource Management Fit: An Empirical Study" 26 (26): 364-381, 2005

    70 Adams, R, "Innovation Management Measurement: A Review: A review" 8 (8): 21-47, 2006

    71 Senge, P, "Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution" 42 (42): 24-38, 2001

    72 Scherer, F. M, "Industrial Market Tructure and Economic Performance" Houghton-Mifflin 1990

    73 Scherer, F. M, "Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance" Houghton Mifflin Company 1980

    74 Roth, K, "Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates" 23 (23): 715-736, 1992

    75 Hart, S, "How Strategy- making Processes Can Make a Difference" 15 (15): 251-269, 1994

    76 Murray, G, "Have UK Venture Capitalists a Bias Against Investment in New Technology Based Firms?" 24 (24): 283-299, 1993

    77 Barney, J. B, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

    78 O’Regan, N, "Fast Tracking Innovation in Manufacturing SME" 26 (26): 251-261, 2006

    79 Moore, B, "Factors Constraining the Growth of Small High Technology Companies: A Case Study of the Cambridge Sub-region" Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge 1992

    80 Freel, M. S, "External linkages and Product Innovation in Small Manufacturing Firms" 12 (12): 245-266, 2000

    81 March, J. G, "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning" 2 (2): 71-87, 1991

    82 Keizer, J. A, "Explaining Innovative Efforts of SMEs: An Exploratory Survey Among SMEs in the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Sector in the Netherlands" 22 (22): 1-13, 2002

    83 Zahra, S. A, "Entrepreneurship in Midium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems" 26 (26): 947-976, 2000

    84 Oerlemans, L. A. G, "Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The Usefulness of the Economic Network Approach in Analyzing Innovation" 89 (89): 298-309, 1998

    85 Koschatzky, K, "Development and Innovation Potential in the Slovene Manufacturing Industry: Analysis of an Industrial Innovation Survey" 21 (21): 311-324, 2001

    86 Scott, S. G, "Determinations of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

    87 Kim, Y, "Determinants of Technological Innovation in the Small Firms of Korea" 23 (23): 215-226, 1993

    88 Romijn, H, "Determinant of Innovation Capability in small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England" 31 : 1053-1067, 2002

    89 Porter, M. E, "Competitive Strategy" Free Press 1980

    90 Morcillo, P, "Chip, a Widely Expressed Chromosomal Protein Required for Segmentation and Activity of a Remote Wing Margin Enhancer in Drosophila" 11 (11): 2729-2740, 1997

    91 Duncan, R. B, "Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty" 17 (17): 313-327, 1972

    92 Schumpeter, J. A, "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy" Harper 1942

    93 Brown, T. E, "An Operationalization of Stevenson’s Conceptualization of Entrepreneurship as Opportunity-based Firm Behavior" 22 (22): 953-968, 2001

    94 Cohen, W, "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation" 35 (35): 128-152, 1990

    95 Nieto, M, "Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge Spillovers, and Innovative Effort" 25 (25): 1141-1157, 2005

    96 Hall, L. A, "A Study of R&D, Innovation, and Business Performance in the Canadian Biotechnology Industry" 22 (22): 231-244, 2002

    97 Gopalakrishnan, S, "A Re-examination of Product and Process Innovations Using a Knowledge- based View" 10 (10): 147-166, 1999

    98 Govindarajan, V, "A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business- Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy" 31 (31): 828-853, 1988

    99 Covin, J. G, "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior" 16 (16): 7-25, 1991

    100 Le Blanc, L. J, "A Comparison of US and Japanese Technology Management and Innovation" 13 (13): 601-614, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Corporation Management Association KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.56 1.56 1.63
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.75 1.7 2.494 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼