RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      CSCL 환경에서 협력학습 지원 도구의 유형이 협력적 지식 구축에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Collaboration Supporting Types on Collaborative Knowledge Construction in CSCL Environment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76616315

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Most of learners don`t build a collaborative knowledge effectively in CSCL environment. They have some difficulties in collaborative knowledge construction activities for coordination and communication. Thus, we may need to provide learners with scaffolds that could support coordination or communication activities by coordination supporting script and communication supporting script. These scripts are complementary (Dillenbourg & Betrancourt, 2006), and could have synergetic effects on collaborative knowledge construction in CSCL environment(Reiser, 2002). In particular, it needs to complement the weak points of the communication supporting script by means of script affordance. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of three types of collaboration supporting tools(coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance, coordination and communication supporting script, and coordination supporting script) on process and outcomes of collaborative knowledge construction in CSCL environment. The results of this study showed that the coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance generated significantly more learners` participations and higher scores of domain-specific knowledge than coordination supporting script. Some learners under the condition of coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance produced higher quality of learning outcomes than learners under the condition of coordination supporting script. These could be a partial evidence of what coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance could support a collaboration knowledge construction effectively.
      번역하기

      Most of learners don`t build a collaborative knowledge effectively in CSCL environment. They have some difficulties in collaborative knowledge construction activities for coordination and communication. Thus, we may need to provide learners with scaff...

      Most of learners don`t build a collaborative knowledge effectively in CSCL environment. They have some difficulties in collaborative knowledge construction activities for coordination and communication. Thus, we may need to provide learners with scaffolds that could support coordination or communication activities by coordination supporting script and communication supporting script. These scripts are complementary (Dillenbourg & Betrancourt, 2006), and could have synergetic effects on collaborative knowledge construction in CSCL environment(Reiser, 2002). In particular, it needs to complement the weak points of the communication supporting script by means of script affordance. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of three types of collaboration supporting tools(coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance, coordination and communication supporting script, and coordination supporting script) on process and outcomes of collaborative knowledge construction in CSCL environment. The results of this study showed that the coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance generated significantly more learners` participations and higher scores of domain-specific knowledge than coordination supporting script. Some learners under the condition of coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance produced higher quality of learning outcomes than learners under the condition of coordination supporting script. These could be a partial evidence of what coordination & communication supporting script with script affordance could support a collaboration knowledge construction effectively.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Dillenbourg, P, "mechanics of CSCL macro scripts" 3 (3): 5-23, 2007

      2 Dillenbourg, P, "flexibility in coordination-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning" 23 : 1-13, 2006

      3 GE, X, "conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions" 52 (52): 5-22, 2004

      4 Xie, K, "Using question prompts to support ill-structured problem solving in online peer collaborations" 4 (4): 148-165, 2008

      5 Schoonenboom,J, "The effect of a script and a structured interface in grounding discussions" 3 : 327-341, 2008

      6 Lim, B, "Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy" 27 : 403-418, 2006

      7 O’Donnell, A. M, "Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning" Erlbaum 179-196, 1999

      8 Schank, R. C, "Scripts, plans, goals and understanding" Erlbaum 1977

      9 Schellens, T, "Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?" 2 (2): 225-246, 2007

      10 King,A, "Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. In Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning" Springer 13-37, 2007

      1 Dillenbourg, P, "mechanics of CSCL macro scripts" 3 (3): 5-23, 2007

      2 Dillenbourg, P, "flexibility in coordination-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning" 23 : 1-13, 2006

      3 GE, X, "conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions" 52 (52): 5-22, 2004

      4 Xie, K, "Using question prompts to support ill-structured problem solving in online peer collaborations" 4 (4): 148-165, 2008

      5 Schoonenboom,J, "The effect of a script and a structured interface in grounding discussions" 3 : 327-341, 2008

      6 Lim, B, "Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy" 27 : 403-418, 2006

      7 O’Donnell, A. M, "Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning" Erlbaum 179-196, 1999

      8 Schank, R. C, "Scripts, plans, goals and understanding" Erlbaum 1977

      9 Schellens, T, "Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?" 2 (2): 225-246, 2007

      10 King,A, "Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. In Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning" Springer 13-37, 2007

      11 GE, X, "Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions" 52 (52): 5-22, 2003

      12 Choi, I, "Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion" 33 (33): 483-511, 2005

      13 Reiser,B.J, "Scaffolding complex learning; the mechanism of structuring and problematizing student work" 13 (13): 305-335, 2004

      14 Rosenshine, B, "Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research" 64 : 479-630, 1994

      15 Dillenbourg,P, "Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL?" Open Universiteit Nederland. 61-91, 2002

      16 Makitalo, K, "Online collaborative learning: Will collaboration scripts reduce uncertainty?" 45 (45): 25-29, 2005

      17 Rummel, N, "Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings" 14 (14): 201-224, 2005

      18 Hacker, D. J, "Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications" 94 (94): 699-718, 2002

      19 Jeong, A, "How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation" 39 (39): 875-887, 2008

      20 Stahl,G, "Group cognition : Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge" The MIT Press 201-360, 2006

      21 Scardamalia, M, "Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In Thinking and Learning Skills: Research and Open Questions (Vol. 2,)" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 563-577, 1985

      22 Hron, A, "Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in a video-based learning setting: effects of a shared workspace and a content-specific graphical representation" 38 (38): 236-248, 2006

      23 King,A, "Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning" 27 (27): 111-126, 1992

      24 Weinberger, A, "Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning with structuring tools" Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Institute for Empirical Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology 1-30, 2003

      25 Stegmann, K, "Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts" 2 (2): 421-447, 2007

      26 Dillenbourg,P, "Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication" Springer 243-264, 2005

      27 USDE, "Cooperative Learning Project Rubric B: Outcome or Product. In the U.S. Department of Education"

      28 Johnson, D. W, "Cooperation and the use of technology. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology" Simon & Schuster Macmillan. 1017-1044, 1996

      29 Graham, C. R, "Computer-mediated learning groups: benefits and challenges to using groupwork in online learning environments. In Online collaborative learning: theory and practice" Idea Group Inc 181-202, 2004

      30 Dillenbourg, P, "Collaboration Load. In Handling complexity in learning environments: theory and research" Emerald Group Publishing 141-165, 2006

      31 Kirschner, P. A, "Coercing Knowledge Construction in Collaborative Learning Environment" 24 (24): 403-420, 2007

      32 권숙진, "CSCL에서 협력적 지식 구축을 지원하는 컴퓨터 기반 협력 스크립트 효과 분석" 한양대학교 2009

      33 김현송, "CSCL에서 조정지원 도구 유형이 공유 정신 모형과 팀 활동에 미치는 영향" 한양대학교 2007

      34 Han, J, "Applying Instructional Strategy to Scripting CSCL" 1604-1609, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-04-20 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association Of Educational Information & Broadcasting -> Korea Association for Educational Information and Media KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.59 1.59 1.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2 1.96 2.299 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼