RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국 현대미술의 문화정체성에 대한 미술사적 고찰: 1978년 이후 정치사회적 변화와 미술의 관계 = The Formation of Cultural Identity: In Chinese Contemporary Art Since 1978

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104151445

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study aims to understand the formation of the cultural identity which has 'hybridity' embodying locality and globality in Chinese contemporary art since 1978. Through analyzing concrete art works, I searched for the process of obtaining Chinese cultural identity with a close interrelation between sudden change in socio-political context and art.
    In the first chapter, following the argument of Michael Sullivan, I list the reason why Chinese art should be deindividualized after birth of the P.R.China with its' stubborn socialist policies. Chinese art world developing socialist realism had had an intimate relationship with the politics using art as a tool for strong socialism. These socio-political characters are the base for advancing the Chinese own locality. Especially through the Cultural Revolution, artists worked all together making huge art projects without their own names. The political shift in these generations brought on the economic reformation which gave rise to Chinese art since 1978. After easing socialist restriction with the open-door policy, artists who had been neglected for 30 years were faced with gaining freedom of creation like ‘Stars’ in 1979.
    In the 1980s, Chinese locality materializing in the socio-political context had been changed by an active influx of western civilization including ideology and culture. It gave chance to Chinese artists to come in contact with various western schools. It was the inflow that brought many kinds of changes in Chinese society and gave birth to the first Chinese avant-garde movement starting with the ’85 Movement’in the 1980s. The 1989 Movement for Democracy, one of the Tiananmen Square protests, spread antipathy and mutual distrust throughout the country. It encouraged antiestablishment avant-garde art, and ‘Chinese New Art: Post 1989’ exhibition by Li Xianting introduced ‘Cynical Realism’ and ‘Political Pop’ which were the first step of Chinese art to the international art world.
    The forced dispersion of the Old Summer Palace, known as the Garden of Perfect Clarity, which was the Mecca for liberal intellectuals caused diversification of contemporary art. In accordance with an article by Chinese critic Li Xianting, I have arranged the five tendencies of Chinese contemporary art in the 1990s. These five characteristics are the base of reading postmodernism in Chinese contemporary art. Lately, there are lots of debates among scholars from east and west about whether or not Chinese art has postmodernity. In the third chaper, I analyzed the on-going debates through comparisons of the perspective of Sheldon Hsiao-peng Lu and Wang Ning. I described the Chinese cultural identity focusing on Cai Guo-Qiang’s works embodying both locality and globality. Finally, I explained Chinese art as one of the leading forms of contemporary art by analyzing his works, the first Chinese contemporary artist to have a solo exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum.
    In this development, I could see how the Chinese art world achieved its locality which accepted capitalistic market systems in socialist society. Chinese contemporary art has been characterized as having globality even though it does not coincide with western avant-garde and postmodernism. It is significant that my study has understood Chinese cultural identity through on-going exhibitions and cutting-edge artists based on earlier studies from east and west. Chinese hybrid art has succeeded in both the art market and academics. Although Chinese contemporary art has been too commercialized, it would be one of the concrete examples of a good model for Asian art.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study aims to understand the formation of the cultural identity which has 'hybridity' embodying locality and globality in Chinese contemporary art since 1978. Through analyzing concrete art works, I searched for the process of obta...

    The purpose of this study aims to understand the formation of the cultural identity which has 'hybridity' embodying locality and globality in Chinese contemporary art since 1978. Through analyzing concrete art works, I searched for the process of obtaining Chinese cultural identity with a close interrelation between sudden change in socio-political context and art.
    In the first chapter, following the argument of Michael Sullivan, I list the reason why Chinese art should be deindividualized after birth of the P.R.China with its' stubborn socialist policies. Chinese art world developing socialist realism had had an intimate relationship with the politics using art as a tool for strong socialism. These socio-political characters are the base for advancing the Chinese own locality. Especially through the Cultural Revolution, artists worked all together making huge art projects without their own names. The political shift in these generations brought on the economic reformation which gave rise to Chinese art since 1978. After easing socialist restriction with the open-door policy, artists who had been neglected for 30 years were faced with gaining freedom of creation like ‘Stars’ in 1979.
    In the 1980s, Chinese locality materializing in the socio-political context had been changed by an active influx of western civilization including ideology and culture. It gave chance to Chinese artists to come in contact with various western schools. It was the inflow that brought many kinds of changes in Chinese society and gave birth to the first Chinese avant-garde movement starting with the ’85 Movement’in the 1980s. The 1989 Movement for Democracy, one of the Tiananmen Square protests, spread antipathy and mutual distrust throughout the country. It encouraged antiestablishment avant-garde art, and ‘Chinese New Art: Post 1989’ exhibition by Li Xianting introduced ‘Cynical Realism’ and ‘Political Pop’ which were the first step of Chinese art to the international art world.
    The forced dispersion of the Old Summer Palace, known as the Garden of Perfect Clarity, which was the Mecca for liberal intellectuals caused diversification of contemporary art. In accordance with an article by Chinese critic Li Xianting, I have arranged the five tendencies of Chinese contemporary art in the 1990s. These five characteristics are the base of reading postmodernism in Chinese contemporary art. Lately, there are lots of debates among scholars from east and west about whether or not Chinese art has postmodernity. In the third chaper, I analyzed the on-going debates through comparisons of the perspective of Sheldon Hsiao-peng Lu and Wang Ning. I described the Chinese cultural identity focusing on Cai Guo-Qiang’s works embodying both locality and globality. Finally, I explained Chinese art as one of the leading forms of contemporary art by analyzing his works, the first Chinese contemporary artist to have a solo exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum.
    In this development, I could see how the Chinese art world achieved its locality which accepted capitalistic market systems in socialist society. Chinese contemporary art has been characterized as having globality even though it does not coincide with western avant-garde and postmodernism. It is significant that my study has understood Chinese cultural identity through on-going exhibitions and cutting-edge artists based on earlier studies from east and west. Chinese hybrid art has succeeded in both the art market and academics. Although Chinese contemporary art has been too commercialized, it would be one of the concrete examples of a good model for Asian art.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김학관, "현대중국학입문" 청목출판사 2002

    2 로버트 앳킨스(Atkins, Robert), "현대미술의 개념풀이 Art Speak" 시공사 2006

    3 유홍준, "현대 중국 사회와 문화" 도서출판 그린 2005

    4 마키 요이치(牧陽一), "중국현대아트 中国现代アート" 토향 2008

    5 마이클 설리반(Sullivan, Michael), "중국미술사 The Arts of China" 형설출판사 1982

    6 이원일, "좌담: 중국 현대미술의 현주소와 지향점" 88-91, 2005

    7 윤재갑, "원명원사태와 중국 현대미술" 72-79, 1996

    8 레나토 포지올리(Poggioli, Renato), "아방가르드 예술론 Teoria Dell’Arte D’Avanguardia" 문예출판사 1996

    9 크레그 클루나스(Clunas, Craig), "새롭게 읽는 중국의 미술 Oxford History of Art 1" 시공아트 2006

    10 호미 바바(Bhabha, Homi), "문화의 위치- 탈식민주의 문화이론 The Location of Culture" 소명출판사 2002

    1 김학관, "현대중국학입문" 청목출판사 2002

    2 로버트 앳킨스(Atkins, Robert), "현대미술의 개념풀이 Art Speak" 시공사 2006

    3 유홍준, "현대 중국 사회와 문화" 도서출판 그린 2005

    4 마키 요이치(牧陽一), "중국현대아트 中国现代アート" 토향 2008

    5 마이클 설리반(Sullivan, Michael), "중국미술사 The Arts of China" 형설출판사 1982

    6 이원일, "좌담: 중국 현대미술의 현주소와 지향점" 88-91, 2005

    7 윤재갑, "원명원사태와 중국 현대미술" 72-79, 1996

    8 레나토 포지올리(Poggioli, Renato), "아방가르드 예술론 Teoria Dell’Arte D’Avanguardia" 문예출판사 1996

    9 크레그 클루나스(Clunas, Craig), "새롭게 읽는 중국의 미술 Oxford History of Art 1" 시공아트 2006

    10 호미 바바(Bhabha, Homi), "문화의 위치- 탈식민주의 문화이론 The Location of Culture" 소명출판사 2002

    11 황두, "문화유변의 결정-중국현대회화에 관하여, in 한중 2002 새로운 표정" 예술의 전당 2002

    12 长谷川估子, "唐昕 等, 芬。马六明" 程昕东出版公司 2004

    13 高明潞, "创造历史中国20世纪80年代现代艺术纪念展" 岭南美术出版社 2006

    14 张群生, "今日中国艺术家: 方力钧" 河北教育出版社 2006

    15 郭晓彦, "中坚: 新世纪中国艺术的八个关键形象展" 世纪出版集团 上海人民出版社 2009

    16 Wang, Ning, "The Mapping of Chinese Postmodernity" 24 (24): 19-40, 1997

    17 Bhabha, Homi, "The Location of Culture" Routledge 1994

    18 Gao, Minglu, "The '85 Movement: Avant-Guarde Art in the Post-Mao Era" Harvard University 1999

    19 Storr, Robert, "Prince of Tides" 160-165, 1999

    20 Sullivan, Michael, "Modern Chinese Artists" University of California Press 2006

    21 Lu, Sheldon Hsiao-Peng, "Global Postmodernization: The Intellectual, the Artist, and China's Condition" 24 (24): 65-97, 1997

    22 Gao, Minglu, "Extensionality and Intentionality in a Transnational Cultural System" 57 (57): 36-39, 1998

    23 Doran, C. Valerie, "China’s New Art, Post-89: With a Retrospective From 1979-1989" Asia Art Archive 2001

    24 Sans, Jerome, "China Talks Interviews with 32 Contemporary Artists" Timezone 8 2009

    25 Munroe, Alexandra, "CAI GUO-QIANG : I WANT TO BELIEVE" Guggenheim Museum Publications 2008

    26 Sullivan, Michael, "Art in China since 1949" (159) : 712-722, 1999

    27 Ratnam, Niru, "Art and Globalisation, in Themes in Contemporary Art" Yale University Press 277-313, 2004

    28 Sullivan, Michael, "Art and Artists of Twentieth-Century China" University of California Press 1996

    29 Stallabrass, Julian, "Art Incorporated: The Story of Contemporary Art" Oxford University Press 2004

    30 费大为, "85 新潮: 中国第一次当代艺术运动" 世纪出版集团上海人民出版社 2007

    31 최병식, "21세기중국문화지도(2): 현대미술2. 불붙은 국내 경매시장 ‘레드아트’ 급부상"

    32 리시엔팅(栗宪庭), "1990년대 중국 현대미술의 다원적 경향" 56-61, 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-12-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Misulsahakbo(Reviews on the Art History) -> Korean Bulletin of Art History KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.35 0.35 0.41
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.43 0.42 1.045 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼