조직역량에 관한 많은 연구에도 불구하고 R&D 조직역량을 체계적으로 다룬 연구는 부족하다. 본 연구에서는 한국과 미국의 제조업 R&D 조직을 대상으로 R&D 조직역량이 R&D 조직성과에 미치는 ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76599052
2009
Korean
조직역량 ; R& ; D ; 한국 ; 미국 ; 구조방정식 ; Organizational capability ; Korea ; United States ; Structural Equation Modeling
KCI등재후보
학술저널
740-767(28쪽)
20
0
상세조회0
다운로드조직역량에 관한 많은 연구에도 불구하고 R&D 조직역량을 체계적으로 다룬 연구는 부족하다. 본 연구에서는 한국과 미국의 제조업 R&D 조직을 대상으로 R&D 조직역량이 R&D 조직성과에 미치는 ...
조직역량에 관한 많은 연구에도 불구하고 R&D 조직역량을 체계적으로 다룬 연구는 부족하다. 본 연구에서는 한국과 미국의 제조업 R&D 조직을 대상으로 R&D 조직역량이 R&D 조직성과에 미치는 효과를 실증적으로 분석하였다. R&D 조직역량의 측정은 개별역량, 아키텍처역량, 프로세스역량의 관점에서 측정하였으며, R&D 성과는 균형성과표(BSC)의 관점에서 측정하였다. 구조방정식 기법으로 연구모형을 추정한 결과, 한국과 미국 모두 R&D 조직역량이 R&D 성과에 기여한다는 것이 밝혀졌으며, 한국이 미국보다 R&D 조직역량의 기여도가 통계적으로 더욱 크다는 것도 밝혀졌다. 이와 같은 결과는 한국의 제조업 R&D 생산성이 미국보다 높을 수 있다는 암시를 준다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper examined the effect of organizational capability on performance in Korean and the United States manufacturing R&D organizations. We used self-reported data from 122 Korean and 79 U.S. firms to address three research questions. Structural eq...
This paper examined the effect of organizational capability on performance in Korean and the United States manufacturing R&D organizations. We used self-reported data from 122 Korean and 79 U.S. firms to address three research questions. Structural equation modeling techniques validated the adapted instrument used in the study, and revealed that R&D organizational capability accounts for R&D performance. The degree of explanation power for the performance was significantly higher in Korean than the U.S. R&D organizations. Several implications of the findings were discussed.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 남영호, "과학기술계 출연연구기관 기관평가지표의 BSC 관점 분석" 기술경영경제학회 13 (13): 265-293, 2005
2 Bremser, W.G., "Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement" 34 (34): 229-238, 2004
3 Roussel, P.A., "Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy" Harvard Business School Press 1991
4 Bain, P.G., "The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams" 32 (32): 55-73, 2001
5 Samson, D., "The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance" 17 (17): 393-409, 1999
6 Tsai,K.H, "The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry" 15 (15): 183-195, 2004
7 Hiltrop,J.-M, "The impact of human resource management on organisational performance: theory and research" 14 (14): 628-637, 1996
8 Sher, P.J., "The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry" 25 (25): 33-43, 2005
9 Kaplan, R.S., "The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance" 70 (70): 71-79, 1992
10 Andrews, K.R., "The Concept of Corporate Strategy" Irwin Professional Publishing 1987
1 남영호, "과학기술계 출연연구기관 기관평가지표의 BSC 관점 분석" 기술경영경제학회 13 (13): 265-293, 2005
2 Bremser, W.G., "Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement" 34 (34): 229-238, 2004
3 Roussel, P.A., "Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy" Harvard Business School Press 1991
4 Bain, P.G., "The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams" 32 (32): 55-73, 2001
5 Samson, D., "The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance" 17 (17): 393-409, 1999
6 Tsai,K.H, "The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry" 15 (15): 183-195, 2004
7 Hiltrop,J.-M, "The impact of human resource management on organisational performance: theory and research" 14 (14): 628-637, 1996
8 Sher, P.J., "The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry" 25 (25): 33-43, 2005
9 Kaplan, R.S., "The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance" 70 (70): 71-79, 1992
10 Andrews, K.R., "The Concept of Corporate Strategy" Irwin Professional Publishing 1987
11 Amit, R., "Strategic assets and organizational rent" 14 (14): 33-46, 1993
12 Barney, J.B., "Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases. Upper Saddle River" Pearson Education 2006
13 Collis,D.J, "Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities?" 15 : 143-152, 1994
14 Lefebvre, E., "R&D-related capabilities as determinants of export performance" 10 (10): 365-377, 1998
15 Abbey, A., "R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors" 26 (26): 362-368, 1983
16 조성표, "R&D Scoreboard에 의한 연구개발투자와 성과의 연관성 분석" 기술경영경제학회 10 (10): 98-123, 2002
17 Nunnally,J, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill 1978
18 Grant,R.M, "Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration" 7 (7): 375-387, 1996
19 Bredin,K, "People capability of project-based organisations: a conceptual framework" 26 (26): 566-576, 2008
20 Chawla, A., "Organizational environment and performance of research groups - a typological analysis" 43 (43): 373-391, 1998
21 Akgűn, A.E., "Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: an empirical analysis" 26 (26): 103-130, 2009
22 Deshpande, R., "Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research Odyssey" 21 (21): 3-22, 2004
23 Kusunoki, K., "Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings" 9 (9): 699-718, 1998
24 Hair, J.F., "Multivariate Data Analysis" Prentice-Hall International 1998
25 Griffin,A, "Metrics for measuring product development cycle time" 10 (10): 112-125, 1993
26 Prajogo, D.I., "Manufacturing strategies and innovation performance in newly industrialised countries" 107 (107): 52-68, 2007
27 Narayanan,V.K, "Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage" Prentice Hall 2001
28 Roberts, E.B., "Managerial determinants of industrial R&D performance: an analysis of the global chemicals/materials industry" 69 (69): 129-152, 1994
29 Jain, R.K., "Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing the Unmanageable" Wiley-Interscience 1997
30 Calantone, R.J., "Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance" 31 (31): 515-524, 2002
31 배병렬, "LISREL 구조방정식모델-이해,활용 및 프로그래밍 제2판" 도서출판 청람 2008
32 Gold, A.H., "Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective" 18 (18): 185-214, 2001
33 Guan, J., "Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms" 23 (23): 737-747, 2003
34 Li, M., "Information technology and firm performance: linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts" 35 (35): 43-51, 1999
35 Dale Stoel, M., "IT capabilities and firm performance: a contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type" 46 (46): 181-189, 2009
36 Pirola-Merlo, A., "How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams" 13 (13): 561-581, 2002
37 Drucker, P.F., "Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management" Harvard Business School Press 1998
38 Barney,J.B, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991
39 Teece, D.J., "Firm capabilities, resources and the concept of strategy" 18 (18): 509-533, 1997
40 Garcĭa-Muiňa, F.E., "Explaining and measuring success in new business: the effect of technological capabilities on firm results" 27 (27): 30-46, 2007
41 Akgűn, A.E., "Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance" 27 (27): 501-513, 2007
42 Leonard-Barton,D, "Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development" 13 : 111-125, 1992
43 한웅규, "An Examination of the Relationship between Capability and Performance of the Korean Corporate Research Institutes" 성균관대학교 2006
44 Cohen, W.M., "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation" 35 (35): 128-152, 1990
45 Burke, W.W., "A causal model of organizational performance and change" 18 (18): 523-545, 1992
과학기술혁신체제 하에서의 국가연구개발 평가 시스템 개선에 관한 연구
기술혁신활동이 부도위험에 미치는 영향에 있어서 매출액과 수익성의 매개효과
바이오 신제품관련 태도와 혁신성 및 구매의사에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.14 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.21 | 1.2 | 1.278 | 0.16 |
한국의 재난관리체계 (Disaster Management System in Korea)
K-MOOC 국가민방위재난안전교육원 NDTI Int'l Cooperation Team한국의 재난관리체계 (Disaster Management System in Korea)
K-MOOC 국가민방위재난안전교육원 NDTI Int'l Cooperation Team한국의 재난관리체계 (Disaster Management System in Korea)
K-MOOC 국가민방위재난안전교육원 NDTI Int'l Cooperation Team초강대국미국과중국의역사적비밀
계명대학교 은은기미국의외교정책
가톨릭대학교 베네딕트드도미닉로그인하고 관련된 다양한 학술자료를 확인해 보세요.
로그인