경쟁시장의 창출과 경쟁법: 유비쿼터스도시서비스 시장의 경우 = Creating Competitive Markets and Competition Law: The Case of the Ubiquitous City Service Markets

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article tries to deal with specific competition issues raised in the course of making a new market in which there had been no market function at all or the spontaneous formation of the market function is hard to be expected. Under such situations, competition-fostering policy defined broadly should be implemented which requires positive policy measures distinctive from those for the general competition law. As a proposition to the discussion, this article draws a line between the general competition law and the special competition law and corresponds the former to the narrowly-defined competition-fostering policy in comparison to the broadly-defined competition-fostering policy. I will use the term of the broadly-defined competition-fostering policy as inclusive of various policy tools designed to aim to establish a pro-competitive institutional framework. Against this background, this article focuses on the case of the ubiquitous city service markets which are encouraged to emerge with the operation of the Act on the Construction, etc. of Ubiquitous Cities(U-City Construction Act). Recently, the U-City model as a new futuristic city paradigm tends to actively apply to both the development of new cities and the improvement of old city regions in Korea. U-city Construction Act has it as an objective to improve competitiveness of the cities and to promote sustainable development. The U-City concept has two elements: U-City infrastructure and U-City services. Viewed from the whole process of the U-City realization, the former is related to planning and construction stages and the latter is related to the management and operation stages. For the U-City services to be profitable enough to induce private investment, the active role of government is needed in developing business models based on the definition of property rights and in presenting public-private partnership or private participation models because the public feature of the U-City services does not seem to allow the creation of competitive markets and even the spontaneous market formation. By explaining some institutional tasks and suggesting some kinds of ways to cope with those, I would like to emphasize the importance and effectiveness of the competition principle which should be consistently preserved even in the context of the broadly-defined competition-fostering policy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김종보, "홈네트워크의 설치 및 관리를 위한 법적 검토" 서울대 공익산업법센터 1 (1): 2008

2 최병선, "코오스: 시장의 진실과 세상의 이치 in : 자유 주의: 시장과 정치" 부키 2006

3 새뮤얼 보울스, "자본주의 이해하기: 경쟁․명령․변화의 3차원 경제학" 후마니 타스 2009

4 조성원, "자본시장을 활용한 공공투자 자금조달에 관한 연구" 한국증권연구원 2008

5 이규정, "인터넷기반서비스 법제 체계화 연구"

6 김종보, "유시티 건설의 법적 쟁점 in: 정보통신법연구 III" 경인 문화사 2008

7 이지희, "유비쿼터스도시구현을 위한 법령현황 및 개선방안" 법무부 (43) : 115-143, 2008

8 최창선, "유비쿼터스도시 I" 선텔레콤 2008

9 구지희, "유비쿼터스 도시, U-City 총론" 시그마프레스 2009

10 정필운, "유비쿼터스 도시(u-city) 구축을 위한 입법의 동향과 지향" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 585-616, 2007

11 유영철, "신거버넌스로서 민-관 협력 그리고 민간투자에 관한 연구- 공공서비스 확충을 위한 민간투자방식의 레짐이동을 중심으로 -" 한국정부학회 20 (20): 21-46, 2008

12 김승욱, "시장인가? 정부인가?" 부키 2005

13 존 맥밀런, "시장의 탄생" 민음사 2007

14 홍대식, "사법적 관점에서 본 불공정거래행위 in: 경쟁 법연구 제18권" 법문사 2008

15 박세일, "법경제학" 박영사 2004

16 이승우, "민관 합동형 PF사업의 현황 및 효율화 방안"

17 밀랜드 M. 레레, "미래를 잡는 독점의 기술" 흐름출판 2006

18 장하준, "국가의 역할" 부키 2006

19 권오승, "경제적 경쟁에 있어서 국가의 역할" 45 (45): 2004

20 Kay, John, "The Truth about Markets" Penguin Books 2004

21 Copp, Stephen F, "The Legal Foundation of Free Markets"

22 Coase, Ronald H, "The Firm, the Market and the Law"

23 Yescombe, E. R, "Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance" Butterworth-Heinemann 2007

24 Gavil,Andrew I, "Exclusionary Distribution Strategies by Dominant Firms: Striking a Better Balance" 72 : 2004

25 Landy, Marc K, "Creating Competitive Market: The Politics of Regulatory Reform" Brookings 2007

26 Carlton, Dennis W, "Antitrust and Regulation" 2006

27 Fox, Elenor M, "Abuse of Dominance and Monopolization: How to Protect Competition Without Protecting Competitors in: European Competition Law Annual 2003: What Is an Abuse of a Dominant Position" Hart Publishing 2006