유책 배우자의 이혼청구권 = A Study on the Guilty Spouse`s Claim for Divorce

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article review stheories of whether we recognize the guilty spouse`s claim for divorce and analyzes cases from the Supreme Court of Republic of Korea. In short, I conclude as following. First, there have been positivism and negativism regarding to wheather we recgnize the guilty spouse`s claim for divorce and, further, limitarians in principle disallow the guilty spouse`s claim for divorce, but they allow his/her claim only when the guilty spouse satisfies some conditions. In my view, limitariansperspective seems the most persuasive. Second, the Korean Supreme Court had consistently denied the claim for divorce from the guilty spouse who caused the breakdown of his/her marriage. However, the Supreme Court has restrictively permitted the guilty spouse`s claim for divorce only when he/she satisfies the following three elements since mid-1980s: ① in the case of recrimination-the case when the both spouses have causes for divorce-; ② when the other spouse also wants to divorce when the guilty spouse claims for divorce; and ③ when there had already been other causes for divorce before the guilty spouse`s wrong doing. Third, as such, in principle, the Korean Supreme Court has denied the guilty spouse`s claim for divorce and, at the same time, restrictively allowed his/her claim for divorce only when the guilty spouse satisfies the above three elements. This is the natural conclusion from the viewpoint that valuees on the morality of marriage. However, we need to concern that the global trend of causes for divorce changes from fault principle to breakdown principle and how we introduce and understand this trend. In other words, we could encounter with the question whether we should stick to the fault principle when the relationship of marriage itself was already broken irretrievably and remains in ruin. Therefore, I conclude that we would better try to accept the breakdown principle that opens an opportunity to start a new life for the couple by eliminating the ruined marital relationship with the consideration of the maintenance for the spouse and children as well as the euqitable distribution of marital property.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 金容漢, "｢不貞한 行爲｣의 解釋" 法曹協會 12 (12): 1963

2 崔鎭涉, "離婚節次에서의 子女保護問題, in 現代家族法과 家族政策(金疇洙 교수 華甲紀念論文集)" 三英社 1988

3 李根植, "離婚原因에 있어서의 有責主義와 破綻主義" 延世大 1 : 1965

4 李和淑, "離婚原因에 있어 有責主義와 破綻主義" (2) : 1994

5 金又德, "離婚原因에 대한 比較法的 考察" 韓國民事法學會 (11) : 1995

6 金淑子, "離婚原因, in 現代民法의 課題와 展望" 밀알 1994

7 山川一陽, "離婚原因" 1993

8 朴秉濠, "우리 離婚法과 破綻主義" 考試界 1985

9 申榮鎬, "북한법 연구" 단국대학교 법학연구소 1994

10 朴秉濠, "韓國離婚法의 特色" 經文社 1982

11 李兌榮, "韓國離婚制度硏究" 梨花女子大學校 出版部 1968

12 朴秉濠, "韓國民法上의 離婚原因" 1993

13 金疇洙, "韓國家族法과 課題" 三英社 1993

14 鄭光鉉, "韓國家族法硏究" 서울大學校 出版部 1967

15 高貞明, "韓國家族法" 敎文社 1991

16 韓琫熙, "韓國 離婚法의 回顧와 展望, in 家族法論集" 도서출판 찬글 1999

17 鄭光鉉, "身分法判例硏究" 서울大 5 (5): 1963

18 金曾漢 代表編輯, "註釋民法(下)" 韓國司法行政學會 1972

19 金疇洙, "註釋 親族ㆍ相續法" 法文社 1993

20 金疇洙, "註釋 判例家族法" 三英社 1978

21 金容漢, "親族相續法(보정판)" 博英社 2004

22 吳始映, "親族相續法" 학현사 2006

23 我妻榮, "親族法" 有斐閣 1961

24 中川善之助, "親族法" 靑林書院 1968

25 朴東涉, "親族ㆍ相續法 解說" 청림출판 1994

26 韓琫熙, "西歐 親族法의 最近動向, in 現代家族法과 家族政策(金疇洙 교수 華甲紀念論文集)" 三英社 1988

27 金又德, "裁判上 離婚原因의 問題點과 그 批判" 韓國民事法學會 (6) : 1986

28 金容漢, "裁判上 離婚原因" 18 (18): 1963

29 金鎭鉉, "裁判上 離婚原因" 忠南大學校 大學院 1994

30 崔文基, "裁判上 離婚事由에 관한 判例의 動向"

31 韓琫熙, "美國家族法의 動向"

32 韓琫熙, "美國 離婚法 槪要" 法曹協會 17 (17): 1968

33 韓琫熙, "續 美國家族法學의 動向, in 家族法論集" 도서출판 찬글 1999

34 朴政緖, "破綻主義離婚原因과 有責配偶者의 離婚請求問題" 法院行政處 3 : 1972

35 韓秀子, "破綻主義 離婚法의 最近의 動向" 梨花女子大學校 大學院 1984

36 韓琫熙, "破綻主義 離婚原因의 諸問題, in 家族法論集" 도서출판 찬글 1999

37 金承德, "破綻主義 離婚原因에 관한 硏究" 中央大學校 大學院 1994

38 韓琫熙, "破綻主義 離婚原因" 考試界 1988

39 韓琫熙, "破綻主義 離婚原因"

40 金疇洙, "相續法" 法文社 2008

41 李根植, "相對的 離婚原因" 延世大 3 : 1983

42 久貴忠彦, "現代家族法の展開" 一粒社 1990

43 中川淳, "現代の民法" 有信堂 1990

44 韓琫熙, "獨ㆍ瑞西法上에서 본 有責配偶者의 離婚請求"

45 송영곤, "民法의 爭點(Ⅱ)" 유스티니아누스 2005

46 池元林, "民法講義" 弘文社 2007

47 魚寅義, "民法槪論" 新陽社 1999

48 張庚鶴, "民法大義" 法文社 1966

49 韓琫熙, "比較離婚法" 一潮閣 1976

50 李相錫, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求의 認容" (331) : 1988

51 정현수, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求의 許容範圍" 忠北大 15 (15): 2004

52 吳昌洙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求와 離婚意思" (283) : 1994

53 洪春義, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求와 破綻主義離婚, in 現代民法의 課題와 展望(韓琫熙 교수 華甲紀念論文集)" 밀알 1994

54 韓琫熙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求와 破綻主義 離婚原因의 硏究, in 家族法論集" 도서출판 찬글 1999

55 韓琫熙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求와 破綻主義 離婚原因" (216) : 1988

56 李勝雨, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 판례분석" 5 : 2000

57 趙慶培, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 硏究" 淸州大學校 大學院 1996

58 徐永培, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 硏究" 慶熙大學校 大學院 1990

59 韓三寅, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 硏究" 濟州大 6 : 1990

60 陳贊任, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 硏究" 嶺南大學校 大學院 2001

61 尹矣燮, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 小考" 西京大 11 : 1998

62 崔文基, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관한 判例의 動向" 慶星大 18 (18): 1997

63 金成坤, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求에 관하여" 서울家庭法院 調停委員會 (4) : 2001

64 金疇洙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求가 例外的으로 認容된 事例" (205) : 1987

65 李凞培, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求許容法理와 展望" (356) : 2000

66 申榮鎬, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求權－判例의 動向과 現況을 중심으로－" 高麗大 (42) : 2004

67 金疇洙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求權" 1986

68 鄭範錫, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 法曹協會 19 (19): 1970

69 李根植, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 21 (21): 1966

70 朴泰浩, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 法曹協會 26 (26): 1987

71 金疇洙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 23 (23): 1968

72 金疇洙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 法曹協會 19 (19): 1970

73 具然昌, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 博英社 1991

74 韓三寅, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 考試界 1997

75 韓琫熙, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" 法曹協會 13 (13): 1964

76 金由美, "有責配偶者의 離婚請求" (220) : 1989

77 張庚鶴, "有責配偶者와 破綻主義" 18 (18): 1963

78 姜永虎, "有責配偶者로부터의 離婚請求" 18 : 1987

79 中川淳, "有責配偶者の離婚請求をめぐる一考察, in 私法學論集(民商法雜誌 創刊 25周年紀念) 下卷" 有斐閣 1960

80 高橋忠次郞, "有責配偶者かるの離婚請求, in 現代家族法大系 2" 有斐閣 1980

81 鄭光鉉, "新親族相續法要論" 法文社 1962

82 李根植, "新親族相續法" 一潮閣 1982

83 太田武男, "家族法硏究" 有斐閣 1961

84 朴秉濠, "家族法" 韓國放送通信大學 出版部 1991

85 李庚熙, "家族法" 法元社 2004

86 金淑子, "判例에 나타난 離婚事例硏究" 韓國家族法學會 (28) : 1988

87 朴秉濠, "判例敎材 親族ㆍ相續法" 法文社 1975

88 姜永虎, "代家族法과 家族政策" 三英社 1988

89 墨木三郞, "世界の家族法" 敬文堂 1991

90 "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch"

91 Krause, Harry D, "Family Law" West Publishing Co 1986

92 韓琫熙, "1976년 프랑스 改正離婚法 槪要, in 家族法論集" 도서출판 찬글 1999