RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일상적 대화의 도덕교육적 함의 = The Implications of Ordinary Conversation for Moral Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76552048

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications of ordinary conversation for moral education. N. Noddings has presented for exploring a range of possible uses of conversation in moral education: the highly formal conversation of discourse ethics, the so-called immortal conversation, and a form of ordinary conversation between adult and children. Conversation of the sort that keep concern for one`s partner paramount and still seek the better way are usually voluntary conversation between people who have some affection for one another. That may be the key and the reason that ordinary conversation of a certain kind is so valuable in moral education. When people have loving regard for one another, they can engage in constructive conflict, although it is by no means easy. To establish the relation in which people may come to have positive regard for one another, we need to engage in conversation about shared interests and everyday events. We may well learn more about the value and the strategies of such conversation by studying the different voice as it speak in sensitive interactions. Once the relation is established, when it has come unthinkable to do violence to this other with whom we disagree, we may be able to address the conflict itself. A compromise may be reached, and the force of the better argument may be acknowledged. Nevertheless, sometimes there will be no resolution. However, if they maintain their regard and remain pledged to do one another no harm, a great moral victory has been won. We can supplement ordinary conversation with healthy religious instruction, with powerful and sensitive intellectual training, with all sorts of common sense parenting techniques and we still cannot demand guarantees. Instead we must place our bets somewhere and remain in relations of care and trust with our children. We must have faith in the outcome.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications of ordinary conversation for moral education. N. Noddings has presented for exploring a range of possible uses of conversation in moral education: the highly formal conversation of discourse...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the implications of ordinary conversation for moral education. N. Noddings has presented for exploring a range of possible uses of conversation in moral education: the highly formal conversation of discourse ethics, the so-called immortal conversation, and a form of ordinary conversation between adult and children. Conversation of the sort that keep concern for one`s partner paramount and still seek the better way are usually voluntary conversation between people who have some affection for one another. That may be the key and the reason that ordinary conversation of a certain kind is so valuable in moral education. When people have loving regard for one another, they can engage in constructive conflict, although it is by no means easy. To establish the relation in which people may come to have positive regard for one another, we need to engage in conversation about shared interests and everyday events. We may well learn more about the value and the strategies of such conversation by studying the different voice as it speak in sensitive interactions. Once the relation is established, when it has come unthinkable to do violence to this other with whom we disagree, we may be able to address the conflict itself. A compromise may be reached, and the force of the better argument may be acknowledged. Nevertheless, sometimes there will be no resolution. However, if they maintain their regard and remain pledged to do one another no harm, a great moral victory has been won. We can supplement ordinary conversation with healthy religious instruction, with powerful and sensitive intellectual training, with all sorts of common sense parenting techniques and we still cannot demand guarantees. Instead we must place our bets somewhere and remain in relations of care and trust with our children. We must have faith in the outcome.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정호대, "하버마스의 보편화용론에 대한 비판적 고찰" 서강대학교 1997

    2 고미숙, "인간교육을 위한 서사적 대화모형 연구" 교육문제연구소 (16) : 1-, 2002

    3 김태오, "위대한 교육사상가들 Ⅵ(하버마스)" 교육과학사 2002

    4 이규호, "앎과 삶" 좋은날 2001

    5 이규호, "말의 힘" 제일출판사 1994

    6 김종문, "도덕교육을 위한 학생활동 중심의 대화학습" 교육과학사 2003

    7 김종문, "대화학습의 도덕교육" 교육과학사 1995

    8 고미숙, "대화와 도덕교육" 26 : 21-46, 2001

    9 양미경, "대화식 교과 지도의 원리와 실천 방안" 2 (2): 13-31, 2002

    10 이을상, "담화윤리학과 그 문제들" 10 : 311-343, 1994

    1 정호대, "하버마스의 보편화용론에 대한 비판적 고찰" 서강대학교 1997

    2 고미숙, "인간교육을 위한 서사적 대화모형 연구" 교육문제연구소 (16) : 1-, 2002

    3 김태오, "위대한 교육사상가들 Ⅵ(하버마스)" 교육과학사 2002

    4 이규호, "앎과 삶" 좋은날 2001

    5 이규호, "말의 힘" 제일출판사 1994

    6 김종문, "도덕교육을 위한 학생활동 중심의 대화학습" 교육과학사 2003

    7 김종문, "대화학습의 도덕교육" 교육과학사 1995

    8 고미숙, "대화와 도덕교육" 26 : 21-46, 2001

    9 양미경, "대화식 교과 지도의 원리와 실천 방안" 2 (2): 13-31, 2002

    10 이을상, "담화윤리학과 그 문제들" 10 : 311-343, 1994

    11 Clinchy,Blythe M, "Ways of Knowing and Ways of Being in Approaches to Moral Development" Teachers College Press 180-200, 1993

    12 Surrey,Janet L, "The Self-in-relation in Women's Growth in Connection" The Guilford Press 51-66, 1991

    13 Bernstein,R.J, "The New Consteelation" MIT Press 1992

    14 Buber,M, "The Knowledge of Man" Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. 1965

    15 McCarthy,T, "The Critical Theory of Jűrgen Habermas" MIT Press 1978

    16 박준영, "Richard Rorty의 “대화”와 “아이러니”에 대한 교육적 논의" 한국교육철학회 23 (23): 53-64, 2003

    17 Rorty,R, "Philosophy and Mirror of Nature" Princeton University Press 1980

    18 Oakley,J, "Morality and the Emotion" Routledge 1992

    19 Habermas,J, "Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action" MIT Press 1990

    20 Bubner,R, "Modern German Philosophy" Cambridge University Press 1981

    21 Noddings,N, "Conversation as Moral Education" 23 (23): 107-117, 1994

    22 Noddings,N, "Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education" University of California Press 1984

    23 Sidorkin,A, "Beyond Discourse" State University of NewYork Press 1999

    24 Buber,M, "Between Man and Man" Collins 1979

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼