RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    우리나라 대도시, 중소도시, 군 지역 간 성인 구강건강 수준의 차이 = Geographical disparities for oral health status in Korean adults우리나라 대도시, 중소도시, 군 지역 간 성인 구강건강 수준의 차이

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76545191

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectives: To examine the difference in oral health status of Korean adults according to geographic location. Methods: Using raw data of National Oral Health Survey 2000, the 112 administrative districts were categorized into metropolis(gu: ward of large city), urban(si: city except metropolis), and rural(gun: county) areas. The averages of decayed surfaces/teeth (DS/DT), missing surfaces/teeth (MS/MT), filled surfaces/teeth (FS/FT), DMFS/T, and Community Periodontal Index (CPI), and the proportion of prosthetic treatment need were calculated in each administrative district. Mean age, the number of population in 2000, the proportion of elderly people, the number of privately owned cars, per capita production from manufacturing industry, and the number of medical facilities per 1,000 were obtained as contextual factors. Regression analysis was done to test the regional difference of oral health status including geographic location, mean age, per capita production from manufacturing industries, and the numbert of medical facilities per 1000. Results: The crude averages of oral health indices (DMFS/T, CPI) reflecting the experience of dental caries and periodontal health was significantly higher in urban and rural area than those in metropolis region. The proportion of prosthetic treatment need in urban and rural area was also higher than that in metropolis. In the final regression model adjusted after socio-environmental factors, DS, DT, CPI, and the proportion of prosthetic treatment need in rural region were higher than in metropolis (p<0.05). FS and FT of rural area were lower than those of metropolis. Conclusions: Regional difference in oral health status existed in Korea. This regional difference may be attributable to dissimilar age distribution of each district but socio-environmental factors are still prone to affect this disparity.
    번역하기

    Objectives: To examine the difference in oral health status of Korean adults according to geographic location. Methods: Using raw data of National Oral Health Survey 2000, the 112 administrative districts were categorized into metropolis(gu: ward of l...

    Objectives: To examine the difference in oral health status of Korean adults according to geographic location. Methods: Using raw data of National Oral Health Survey 2000, the 112 administrative districts were categorized into metropolis(gu: ward of large city), urban(si: city except metropolis), and rural(gun: county) areas. The averages of decayed surfaces/teeth (DS/DT), missing surfaces/teeth (MS/MT), filled surfaces/teeth (FS/FT), DMFS/T, and Community Periodontal Index (CPI), and the proportion of prosthetic treatment need were calculated in each administrative district. Mean age, the number of population in 2000, the proportion of elderly people, the number of privately owned cars, per capita production from manufacturing industry, and the number of medical facilities per 1,000 were obtained as contextual factors. Regression analysis was done to test the regional difference of oral health status including geographic location, mean age, per capita production from manufacturing industries, and the numbert of medical facilities per 1000. Results: The crude averages of oral health indices (DMFS/T, CPI) reflecting the experience of dental caries and periodontal health was significantly higher in urban and rural area than those in metropolis region. The proportion of prosthetic treatment need in urban and rural area was also higher than that in metropolis. In the final regression model adjusted after socio-environmental factors, DS, DT, CPI, and the proportion of prosthetic treatment need in rural region were higher than in metropolis (p<0.05). FS and FT of rural area were lower than those of metropolis. Conclusions: Regional difference in oral health status existed in Korea. This regional difference may be attributable to dissimilar age distribution of each district but socio-environmental factors are still prone to affect this disparity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송근배, "한국성인들의 사회경제적 요인 및 구강보건의식행태에 따른 치아우식증 실태분석" 대한구강보건학회 27 (27): 319-328, 2003

    2 신선정, "한국 청소년의 구강보건행태와 사회경제적지위의 연관성" 대한구강보건학회 32 (32): 223-230, 2008

    3 정혜경, "지역사회의 구조적 특성이 사망수준에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 1 (1): 17-50, 1991

    4 장창곡, "우리나라의 지역별 사망원인 구조변화에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1991

    5 한소현, "우리나라 지역별 사망구조의 차이에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 보건대학원 2001

    6 김명희, "서울시 노인의 구강통증 여부 및 치과서비스이용의 사회적 결정요인에 대한 다수준분석" 대한구강보건학회 31 (31): 103-115, 2007

    7 김혜영, "사회경제적 수준과 구강진료필요도의 연관성에 대한 건강행위, 구강진료이용도의 영향 평가" 대한구강보건학회 30 (30): 85-94, 2006

    8 World Health Organization, "World Health Report 2000.Health Systems: Improving Performance"

    9 Blakely TA, "What is the lag time between income inequality and health status?" 54 : 318-319, 2000

    10 Senior M, "Urban-rural mortality differentials: controlling for material deprivation" 51 (51): 289-305, 2000

    1 송근배, "한국성인들의 사회경제적 요인 및 구강보건의식행태에 따른 치아우식증 실태분석" 대한구강보건학회 27 (27): 319-328, 2003

    2 신선정, "한국 청소년의 구강보건행태와 사회경제적지위의 연관성" 대한구강보건학회 32 (32): 223-230, 2008

    3 정혜경, "지역사회의 구조적 특성이 사망수준에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 1 (1): 17-50, 1991

    4 장창곡, "우리나라의 지역별 사망원인 구조변화에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1991

    5 한소현, "우리나라 지역별 사망구조의 차이에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 보건대학원 2001

    6 김명희, "서울시 노인의 구강통증 여부 및 치과서비스이용의 사회적 결정요인에 대한 다수준분석" 대한구강보건학회 31 (31): 103-115, 2007

    7 김혜영, "사회경제적 수준과 구강진료필요도의 연관성에 대한 건강행위, 구강진료이용도의 영향 평가" 대한구강보건학회 30 (30): 85-94, 2006

    8 World Health Organization, "World Health Report 2000.Health Systems: Improving Performance"

    9 Blakely TA, "What is the lag time between income inequality and health status?" 54 : 318-319, 2000

    10 Senior M, "Urban-rural mortality differentials: controlling for material deprivation" 51 (51): 289-305, 2000

    11 Fox A, "The longitudinal stydy: sociodemographic mortality differentials" HMSO 5-10, 1982

    12 Britton M, "The influences of socio-economic and environmental factors on geographic variation in mortality;In Britton M. Mortality and geography: a review in the mnid-1980s England and Wales" Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 57-78, 1990

    13 Bentham G, "Mortality rates in the more rural areas of England and Wales" 16 : 219-226, 1984

    14 Britton M, "Mortality and geography: a review in the mid-1980s England and Wales OPCS Series DS no 9" Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 2-3, 1990

    15 Shouls S, "Modelling inequality in reported long term illness in the UK: combining individual and area characteristics" 50 (50): 366-376, 1996

    16 Sang Gyu Lee, "Korean regional mortality differences according to geographic location" 20 (20): 51-65, 2003

    17 Curtis S, "Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality?" 20 (20): 645-672, 1998

    18 Acheson D, "Independent inquiry into inequalities in health" The Stationary Office 15-30, 1998

    19 McIntyre S, "Ecological approaches: rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment; In Berkman LF, Kawachi I,in Social Epidemiology" Oxford Univ. Press 32-48, 2000

    20 Carstairs V, "Deprivation and health in Scotland" Aberdeen:Aberdeen Univ. Press 87-98, 1991

    21 "Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010"

    22 Robert SA, "Community-level socioeconomic status effects on adult health" 39 : 18-37, 1998

    23 McIntyre S, "Area, class and health: should we be focusing on places or people?" 22 (22): 213-234, 1993

    24 보건복지부, "2006년도 국민구강건강실태조사; 요약본 III" 132-256, 2007

    25 보건복지부, "2000년도 국민구강건강실태조사" 보건복지부 169-281, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한구강보건학회 -> 대한예방치과·구강보건학회
    영문명 : Korean Academy Of Oral Health -> The Korean Academy of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Health
    KCI등재
    2012-05-03 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Academy Of Dental Health -> Korean Academy Of Oral Health KCI등재
    2012-05-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Academy of Dental Health -> Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.09 1.09 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.01 0.91 1.746 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼