假裝留置權의 進入制限을 위한 立法的 考察 = A Study on the Legislative System for restriction of the Pretense Lien

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A lien having a right of retention may sell the property retained at auction in satisfaction of his claim.
Real estate lien is not become public announcement, so there are many problems in the auction procedure. A debtor and builder inflated the cost of lien and mortgage bonds. This paper is described with the point at issue for restriction of the pretense lien.
First, attached real estate can not sell to others person, but three persons are assert that one's lien in the attached real estate. A commonly accepted theory recognized the theory of recognition on opposing power, that lien can resist to garnisher or purchaser. I think that defective public announcement of lien are having not powerful opposing power. A commonly accepted theory insist that the character on public good by mortgage bond of sum. However, mortgage bond by lien in auction practice is a large amount, also receipts and statement of accounts are unbelieve papers.
Second, lien on the later mortgage registration become a many of problem in the auction procedure. A commonly accepted theory recognized the theory of recognition on opposing power. This theory recognized the superiority of lien than mortgage right. I think that defective public announcement of lien break down the system of mortgage rights law on the publish principle.
Third, civil execution law did not prescribe that the application of allotment on lien. A commonly accepted theory deny that the application of allotment on lien, because this is formal auction. But, I think that lien has the mortgage bonds as well as other mortgage rights. That is, Lien has not only mortgage bonds but also be satisfaction of credit.
Fourth, the execution court must introduce the restricted extinction principle in the lien auction procedure. The procedure of auction for sale of mortgage is as well as procedure of auction by lien. So that must introduce the restricted extinction principle.
Fifth, the construction expense of builder for remodeling is object of lien. So, Building owner and builder inflated the construction expense. Specially, builder presented that pretense receipts and statement of accounts through auction procedure. I insist on take possession of execution title by builder.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 李學洙, "留置權이 요구하는 占有의 정도" 釜山判例硏究會 8 : 1998

2 梁彰洙, "留置權의 發生要件으로서의 '債權과 物件간의 牽連關係' in: 法律學의 諸問題, 劉基天博士古稀紀念" 博英社 1988

3 李在性, "留置權의 擔保物權으로서의 性格 in: 民事法의 諸問題, 金容漢敎授 華甲紀念論文集" 博英社 1990

4 車文鎬, "留置權의 成立과 競賣" 法院行政處 42 : 2006

5 嚴東燮, "留置權의 成立要件-牽連性" 2005

6 孫振鴻, "留置權者의 申請에 의한 競賣節次" 法院圖書館 109 : 2006

7 李在性, "留置權者가 신청한 競賣의 性格" 大韓辯護士協會 1992

8 秦光昭, "不動産留置權と抵當權の優劣を決定する基準" (1437) : 1995

9 福永有利, "不動産上の權利關係の釋明と賣却條件 in 民事執行法の基本構造" 西神田編集室 1981

10 "헌법 제23조 제1항"

11 추신영, "유치권자에 의한 경매신청" 한국재산법학회 24 (24): 161-188, 2007

12 오시영, "부동산 유치권 강제집행에 대한 문제점과 입법론적 고찰" 한국토지법학회 23 (23): 213-254, 2007

13 강대성, "민사집행법(제4판)" 삼영사 2008

14 "민사집행법 제258조 제6항"

15 "민법 제490조"

16 "민법 제278조"

17 "민법 제269조 제2항"

18 "민법 1013조 제2항"

19 "議政府地方法院 2008. 3. 21. 선고 2006가합9207 判決"

20 李在性, "註釋 民事執行法(Ⅴ)" 韓國司法行政學會 2004

21 李在性, "註釋 民事執行法(Ⅲ)" 韓國司法行政學會 2004

22 鈴木忠一, "註釋 民事執行法(3)"

23 鈴木忠一, "註釋 民事執行法(3)"

24 李英俊, "物權法(六版)" 博英社 1993

25 郭潤直, "物權法(第七版)" 博英社 2004

26 郭潤直, "民法註解(Ⅵ)-物權(3)" 博英社 2005

27 內田 貴, "民法Ⅲ" 東京大學出版會 2005

28 姜旻成, "民事執行과 留置權" 法院行政處 36 : 2003

29 "日最高裁 1976. 6. 17. 判決"

30 이진기, "擔保物權으로서의 留置權" (8) : 1999

31 田積司, "建築請負工事代金についての不動産留置權と根抵當權"

32 生熊長幸, "建築請負代金債權による敷地への留置權と抵當權(下)" (1447) : 1996

33 "大田高等法院 2004. 1. 15. 선고 2002나5475 判決"

34 "大法院 2006. 8. 25. 선고 2006다22050 判決"

35 "大法院 2005. 8. 19. 선고 2005다22688 判決"

36 "大法院 1987. 6. 9. 86다카2570 判決"

37 岸日出夫, "商事留置權 in 民事執行法" 靑林書院 2001

38 "名古屋地裁 1993. 3. 17. 決定"

39 "全州地方法院 井邑支院 2007. 12. 26. 선고 2006가합864 判決"

40 "光州高等法院 全州裁判部 2008나1052"

41 "光州高等法院 2006. 7. 21. 선고 2005나10219 判決"

42 추신영, "假押留 後에 설정된 抵當權의 優先辨濟的 效力" 한국재산법학회 23 (23): 499-534, 2006

43 Ahrens, "Zivilrechtliche Zurückbehaltungsrechte" ERICH SCHMIDT VERLAG 2003

44 Honsell, "ZGBⅡ 2. Aufl" Helbing & Lichtenhahn 2003

45 "Praxiskommentar zum Allgemeinen Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch samt Nebengesetzen, 2. Bd, ABGB"

46 Koziol, "Grundriss des Bügerlichen Rechts, 1. Bd, 9. Aufl" Manzsche 1987

47 Palandt, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 66. Aufl" C. H. Beck 2007

48 Münchener Komm, "BGB 4. Aufl" C. H. Beck 2003