RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰 = A Study on Necessity and Possibility on the Introduction of Punitive Damages

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76504195

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the introduction of the punitive damages, which is unique in the Anglo-American Law, and the concerned problems in the view of utilizing personal initiatives in controlling or preventing Intentional Torts, which is the obligation of modern Torts law, and further to implement law.
    The common views and precedents so far have regarded the punitive damages as one hard to accept under the Korea's legal systems based on the distinction theory between the civil and criminal liabilities. In other words, they believed that the certain controlling functions of the principle of law regarding torts liability for illegal acts, if any, were merely reflective or secondary effects and that the punitive damages essentially aimed to suppress the offenders and the similar illegal acts.
    Those old arguments, however, do have problems with the principle of law and limitations in the legal functions, restricting the judicial relief for liability for illegal acts within supplementary damages and committing the oppression of unlawfulness and antisociality only into the criminal or administrative restraints. Furthermore, the arguments must be supported by the premise that the controlling systems should work well enough by public agencies such as investigating or administrative ones in order to have some persuasive power.
    But it's practically impossible for a public agency to check every single action that threatens people's lives or violates their rights seriously and to put proper restraints on them in today's highly complex modern society. Even if it's possible, reinforcing the ‘public supervision system’ means enormous investments of money.
    In this vein, the ‘punitive damages,’ which is unique in the Anglo-American law, is intended to force compensations for damages on the offender to control the same illegal acts by him or a third party in the future by adding punishment to the supplementary compensations for the damages caused by the ill-intended illegal acts. It can be recognized as a legal system having the potential to contribute to the modern task that is ‘implementing law’ by using personal initiatives. Thus it's urgent to introduce the punitive damages as a means of improving the problems with the current law.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the introduction of the punitive damages, which is unique in the Anglo-American Law, and the concerned problems in the view of utilizing personal initiatives in controlling or preventing Intentional Torts, ...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the introduction of the punitive damages, which is unique in the Anglo-American Law, and the concerned problems in the view of utilizing personal initiatives in controlling or preventing Intentional Torts, which is the obligation of modern Torts law, and further to implement law.
    The common views and precedents so far have regarded the punitive damages as one hard to accept under the Korea's legal systems based on the distinction theory between the civil and criminal liabilities. In other words, they believed that the certain controlling functions of the principle of law regarding torts liability for illegal acts, if any, were merely reflective or secondary effects and that the punitive damages essentially aimed to suppress the offenders and the similar illegal acts.
    Those old arguments, however, do have problems with the principle of law and limitations in the legal functions, restricting the judicial relief for liability for illegal acts within supplementary damages and committing the oppression of unlawfulness and antisociality only into the criminal or administrative restraints. Furthermore, the arguments must be supported by the premise that the controlling systems should work well enough by public agencies such as investigating or administrative ones in order to have some persuasive power.
    But it's practically impossible for a public agency to check every single action that threatens people's lives or violates their rights seriously and to put proper restraints on them in today's highly complex modern society. Even if it's possible, reinforcing the ‘public supervision system’ means enormous investments of money.
    In this vein, the ‘punitive damages,’ which is unique in the Anglo-American law, is intended to force compensations for damages on the offender to control the same illegal acts by him or a third party in the future by adding punishment to the supplementary compensations for the damages caused by the ill-intended illegal acts. It can be recognized as a legal system having the potential to contribute to the modern task that is ‘implementing law’ by using personal initiatives. Thus it's urgent to introduce the punitive damages as a means of improving the problems with the current law.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입필요성
    • Ⅲ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입가능성
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 〈Abstract〉
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입필요성
    • Ⅲ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입가능성
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼