RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    주거지역 가로망 평가를 위한 통합지표개발에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76503381

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    New paradigms related to urban residential regions are moving toward those viewpoints such as the design of road networks that are walking oriented, public transportation oriented and considering environment friendliness and this is considered to be important in terms of the creation of comfortable residential environments. By now, road networks in residential regions have been only evaluated centering on the mobility and efficiency of the roads and now the necessity of those road networks evaluation indices made for the shake of residents in the residential regions is emerging. To this end, this study developed an integrated evaluation criteria to evaluate road networks in residential regions in diverse city development projects implemented by the social paradigm of city recycling. The study was implemented in 3 stages at large in order to develop the integrated evaluation criteria. First, existing studies related to those residential regions' road networks evaluation criteria reflecting new plan paradigms were reviewed. Next, the evaluation criteria items were determined and weighted values were calculated through a primary and a secondary expert questionnaire surveys in order to hammer out the integrated road networks evaluation criteria. Finally, the effectiveness of the integrated road networks evaluation criteria as suggested by this study was reviewed through the verification of the road networks evaluation criteria made through case studies. To summarize the result of the study, it was indicated that, the road networks in each region such as collecting/distributing . local roads, pedestrian walkways and bicycle roads were more important than main line/subsidiary main line roads in residential regions and road networks between regions for public transportation. It was indicated that, road networks were more important than public transportations in road networks between regions and in road networks in each region, pedestrians' walkways were the most important followed by bicycle roads and road networks in the order of precedence. The result of a review of the effectiveness of the integrated road network evaluation criteria made through case studies indicated that the result was quite different from that of existing road network evaluation criteria and this suggests the necessity of those road network evaluations that consider the evaluation criteria from the viewpoint of users (safety, comfort, convenience) when evaluating road networks in residential regions.
    번역하기

    New paradigms related to urban residential regions are moving toward those viewpoints such as the design of road networks that are walking oriented, public transportation oriented and considering environment friendliness and this is considered to be i...

    New paradigms related to urban residential regions are moving toward those viewpoints such as the design of road networks that are walking oriented, public transportation oriented and considering environment friendliness and this is considered to be important in terms of the creation of comfortable residential environments. By now, road networks in residential regions have been only evaluated centering on the mobility and efficiency of the roads and now the necessity of those road networks evaluation indices made for the shake of residents in the residential regions is emerging. To this end, this study developed an integrated evaluation criteria to evaluate road networks in residential regions in diverse city development projects implemented by the social paradigm of city recycling. The study was implemented in 3 stages at large in order to develop the integrated evaluation criteria. First, existing studies related to those residential regions' road networks evaluation criteria reflecting new plan paradigms were reviewed. Next, the evaluation criteria items were determined and weighted values were calculated through a primary and a secondary expert questionnaire surveys in order to hammer out the integrated road networks evaluation criteria. Finally, the effectiveness of the integrated road networks evaluation criteria as suggested by this study was reviewed through the verification of the road networks evaluation criteria made through case studies. To summarize the result of the study, it was indicated that, the road networks in each region such as collecting/distributing . local roads, pedestrian walkways and bicycle roads were more important than main line/subsidiary main line roads in residential regions and road networks between regions for public transportation. It was indicated that, road networks were more important than public transportations in road networks between regions and in road networks in each region, pedestrians' walkways were the most important followed by bicycle roads and road networks in the order of precedence. The result of a review of the effectiveness of the integrated road network evaluation criteria made through case studies indicated that the result was quite different from that of existing road network evaluation criteria and this suggests the necessity of those road network evaluations that consider the evaluation criteria from the viewpoint of users (safety, comfort, convenience) when evaluating road networks in residential regions.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼