RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공공・민간조직 비교연구 메타분석: Sayre명제의 재검증 = A Meta-Analysis of Public-Private Distinction Research: Sayre's Proposition Revisited

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104158289

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In 1953, Sayre argued that "public and private organizations are fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects." In 2002, based on the results from a meta-analysis of 34 empirical studies, Boyne concluded that Sayre's proposition did not get clear support from the available evidence. The motivation of this study is that Boyne's conclusion was based on a limited research sample, which calls for a meta-analysis with a more comprehensive scope. This study retests Sayre's proposition with an expanded set of empirical studies on the public-private distinction. The results of this meta-analysis show that the evidence provides clear support for the proposition.
    번역하기

    In 1953, Sayre argued that "public and private organizations are fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects." In 2002, based on the results from a meta-analysis of 34 empirical studies, Boyne concluded that Sayre's proposition did not get clear s...

    In 1953, Sayre argued that "public and private organizations are fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects." In 2002, based on the results from a meta-analysis of 34 empirical studies, Boyne concluded that Sayre's proposition did not get clear support from the available evidence. The motivation of this study is that Boyne's conclusion was based on a limited research sample, which calls for a meta-analysis with a more comprehensive scope. This study retests Sayre's proposition with an expanded set of empirical studies on the public-private distinction. The results of this meta-analysis show that the evidence provides clear support for the proposition.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1953년 Sayre는 PAR에 실린 논문에서 “공공조직과 민간조직은 모든 중요하지 않은 점에서 기본적으로 유사하다“라고 지적하였다. 이에 대해 Boyne(2002)은 34편의 실증적 연구결과를 메타 분석하여 Sayre의 주장이 경험적 지지를 받지 못한다고 결론지었다. 본 연구의 목적은 Boyne의 메타분석이 지나치게 제한적인 연구범위와 분석대상에 기초한 것이라는 문제인식하에 이러한 제한점을 극복한 새로운 메타분석을 실시하여 Sayre의 명제를 재검증하는 것이다. 51편의 국외연구와 12편의 국내연구를 대상으로 실시한 본 연구의 메타분석 결과는 Boyne의 결론과는 달리 Sayre의 명제가 충분한 경험적 증거에 의해 뒷받침되고 있음을 보여주었다.
    번역하기

    1953년 Sayre는 PAR에 실린 논문에서 “공공조직과 민간조직은 모든 중요하지 않은 점에서 기본적으로 유사하다“라고 지적하였다. 이에 대해 Boyne(2002)은 34편의 실증적 연구결과를 메타 분석하...

    1953년 Sayre는 PAR에 실린 논문에서 “공공조직과 민간조직은 모든 중요하지 않은 점에서 기본적으로 유사하다“라고 지적하였다. 이에 대해 Boyne(2002)은 34편의 실증적 연구결과를 메타 분석하여 Sayre의 주장이 경험적 지지를 받지 못한다고 결론지었다. 본 연구의 목적은 Boyne의 메타분석이 지나치게 제한적인 연구범위와 분석대상에 기초한 것이라는 문제인식하에 이러한 제한점을 극복한 새로운 메타분석을 실시하여 Sayre의 명제를 재검증하는 것이다. 51편의 국외연구와 12편의 국내연구를 대상으로 실시한 본 연구의 메타분석 결과는 Boyne의 결론과는 달리 Sayre의 명제가 충분한 경험적 증거에 의해 뒷받침되고 있음을 보여주었다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김병섭, "행정조직의 레드테이프:민간조직과의 비교" 30 (30): 1-17, 1996

    2 조경호, "조직유형별 직업만족도 비교연구-공공성 접근을 중심으로" 35 (35): 163-180, 2001

    3 김영종, "정부조직과 민간조직의 직무특성 비교연구"

    4 김호정, "신뢰와 조직몰입" 33 (33): 19-35, 1999

    5 함요상, "신공공관리적 행정개혁의 도입과 수준 변화" 한국정부학회 18 (18): 649-674, 2006

    6 정철현, "복지행정조직의 관리 형태와 조직 몰입도에 관한 연구" 1997

    7 윤종인, "공사조직 구성원의 조직몰입도 비교연구-조직구성원은 왜 그리고 누구에게 몰입하는가" 2004

    8 이근주, "공사부문 종사자간의 동기요인의 차이 분석: PSM을 활용하여" 한국행정연구원 14 (14): 71-99, 2005

    9 이종수, "공공조직, 민간조직 종사자들 간의 욕구체계 비교분석과 정책적 함의" 28 : 149-168, 1997

    10 김상욱, "공공부문과 민간부문의 직업몰입 및 조직몰입: 사회복지직의 사례" 한국사회학회 36 (36): 4-22, 2002

    1 김병섭, "행정조직의 레드테이프:민간조직과의 비교" 30 (30): 1-17, 1996

    2 조경호, "조직유형별 직업만족도 비교연구-공공성 접근을 중심으로" 35 (35): 163-180, 2001

    3 김영종, "정부조직과 민간조직의 직무특성 비교연구"

    4 김호정, "신뢰와 조직몰입" 33 (33): 19-35, 1999

    5 함요상, "신공공관리적 행정개혁의 도입과 수준 변화" 한국정부학회 18 (18): 649-674, 2006

    6 정철현, "복지행정조직의 관리 형태와 조직 몰입도에 관한 연구" 1997

    7 윤종인, "공사조직 구성원의 조직몰입도 비교연구-조직구성원은 왜 그리고 누구에게 몰입하는가" 2004

    8 이근주, "공사부문 종사자간의 동기요인의 차이 분석: PSM을 활용하여" 한국행정연구원 14 (14): 71-99, 2005

    9 이종수, "공공조직, 민간조직 종사자들 간의 욕구체계 비교분석과 정책적 함의" 28 : 149-168, 1997

    10 김상욱, "공공부문과 민간부문의 직업몰입 및 조직몰입: 사회복지직의 사례" 한국사회학회 36 (36): 4-22, 2002

    11 정광호, "공공부문 조직과 민간기업 조직의 직무만족도 비교분석: 한국노동패널연구(KLIPS)자료를 중심으로" 한국정책학회 12 (12): 1-28, 2003

    12 Brewer,G.A., "Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic" 8 : 413-439, 1998

    13 Casile,M., "When Accreditation Standards Change: Factors Affecting Differential Responsiveness of Public and Private Organizations" 45 : 180-195, 2002

    14 Rainey,H.G, "Understanding and Managing Public Organizations" Jossey-Bass/Wiley. 2003

    15 Hickson,D.J., "Top Decisions: Strategic Decision Making in Organizations" Jossey-Bass 1986

    16 Posner,B.T, "The Values of Business and Federal Government Executives: More Different than Alike" 25 : 277-289, 1996

    17 Light,P.C, "The Troubled State of the Federal Public Service" Brookings Institution,Available at www.brook.edu/views/papers/light/ 20020627.htm

    18 Dargie,C, "The Role of Public Sector Chief Executives,Public Administration" 76 : 161-177, 1998

    19 Perry,J.L, "The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy" 13 : 182-201, 1988

    20 Tullock,G, "The Politics of Bureaucracy." Public Affairs Press. 1965

    21 Powell,W., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

    22 Perry,J.L, "The Motivational Bases of Public Service" 50 : 367-373, 1990

    23 Hooijberg,R., "The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Leadership Effectiveness Models: An Examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organization" 33 : 403-431, 2001

    24 Lowi,T, "The End of Liberalism" Norton 1979

    25 Lozeau,D, "The Corruption of Managerial Techniques by Organizations" 55 : 537-564, 2002

    26 Pugh,D.and Others, "The Context of Organization Structures" 51 : 91-114, 1968

    27 Antonsen,M., "The 'Publicness' of Public Organizations" 75 : 337-357, 1997

    28 Bozeman,B.&, "The 'Publicness Puzzle' in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations" 4 : 197-223, 1994

    29 Porter,L.W, "Task Accomplishment and the Management of Time. In ublic Management. Mountain View" Mayfield 1983

    30 Ring,P., "Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints" 10 : 276-286, 1985

    31 Kenny,G, "Strategic Decision Making: Influence Patterns in Public and Private Sector Organizations" 40 : 1987

    32 Wittmer,D, "Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences among Government, Hybrid Sector and Business Managers" 14 : 369-383, 1991

    33 Bozeman,B, "Risk Culture In Public and Private Organizations" 58 : 109-118, 1998

    34 Rainey,H.G, "Research Note: Public and Private Managers' Perceptions of Red Tape" 55 : 567-574, 1995

    35 Bozeman,B, "Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations" 24 : 290-322, 1992

    36 Buchanan,B, "RRed Tape and The Service Ethic: Some Unexpected Differences Between Public and Private Managers" 6 : 423-444, 1975

    37 Bozeman,B, "Public-Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do" 62 : 145-161, 2002

    38 Crewson,P.E, "Public-Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect" 7 : 499-518, 1997

    39 Houston,D.J, "Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test" 10 : 713-727, 2000

    40 Lachman,R, "Public-Private Sector Differences: CEO's Perceptions of Their Role Environments" 28 : 1985

    41 Emmert,M.A, "Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness" 20 : 216-244, 1988

    42 Baldwin,N, "Public versus Private: Not That Different, Not That Consequential" 11 : 1-27, 1987

    43 Kurland,N.B.&, "Public v.Private Perceptions of Formalization,Outcomes,and Justice,Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory" 8 : 391-412, 1999

    44 Kurland,N.B., "Public v. Private Perceptions of Formalization, Outcomes" 9 : 437-458, 1999

    45 Boyne,G, "Public and Private Management: What's the Difference?" 39 : 97-122, 2002

    46 Rainey,H.G, "Public and Private Management Compared. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management" Oxford University Press. 2005

    47 Gabris,G, "Public Sector Motivation as An Independent Variable Affecting Career Decisions" 24 : 33-51, 1995

    48 Rainey,H.G, "Public Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic" 16 : 288-302, 1982

    49 Mecalfe,L, "Public Management: from Imitation to Innovation. In Modern Governance" Sage 1993

    50 Rainey,H.G, "Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structure, Goals, and Individual Roles" 15 : 207-242, 1983

    51 Solomon,E, "Private and Public Sector Managers: An Empirical Investigation of Job Characteristics and Organizational Climate" 71 : 247-259, 1986

    52 Sayre,W, "Premises of Public Administration" 18 : 1953

    53 Atwater,L.E, "Power and Transformational and Transactional Leadership In Public and Private Organizations" 19 : 963-989, 1996

    54 Chubb,J., "Politics, Markets and The Organization of Schools" 82 : 1065-1087, 1988

    55 Dahl,R.A., "Politics, Economics, and Welfare" HarperCollins 1953

    56 Meier,K.J, "Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government" Harcourt Brace. 2000

    57 Baldwin,N, "Perceptions of Public versus Private Sector Personnel and Informal Red Tape: Their Impact on Motivation" 7-27, 1990

    58 Coursey,D., "Perceptions of Personnel System Constraints in Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations" 10 : 54-71, 1990

    59 Langbein,L.I., "Pay, Productivity, and the Public Sector: The Case of Electrical Engineers" 8 : 391-412, 1998

    60 Bordia,P, "Pay Referent Comparison and Pay Level Satisfaction in Private versus Public Sector Organizations in India,International Journal of Human Resource Management" 9 : 155-167, 1998

    61 Zeffane,R, "Patterns of Organizational Commitment and Perceived Management Style: a Comparison of Public and Private Sector Employees" 47 : 977-1010, 1994

    62 Langbein,L.I, "Ownership, Empowerment, and Productivity" 19 : 427-449, 2000

    63 Bozeman,B, "Organizational Rules and the Bureaucratic Personality" 42 : 163-189, 1998

    64 Rosenblatt,Z, "Organizational Response to Decline in the Israeli Electronics Industry" 17 : 953-984, 1996

    65 Heinrich,C.J, "Organizational Form and Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Nonprofit and For-Profit Job-Training Service Providers" 19 : 233-261, 2000

    66 Steinhaus,C.S, "Organizational Commitment: Does Sector Matter?" 19 : 278-288, 1996

    67 Balfour,D, "Organizational Commitment: A Reconceptualization and Empirical Test of Public-Private Differences" 10 : 23-40, 1990

    68 Moon,M.J, "Organizational Commitment Revisited in New Public Management: Motivation, Organizational Culture, Sector, and Managerial Level" 24 : 177-194, 2000

    69 Daft,R.L, "Organization Theory and Design" Shouth Western College Publishing. 2004

    70 Dargie,C, "Observing Chief Executives: Analysing Behavior to Explore Cross-Sectoral Differences" 20 : 39-44, 2000

    71 Christensen,T., "New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice" Ashgate 2001

    72 Jurkiewicz,C.L, "Motivation in Public and Private Organizations: A Comparative Study" 21 : 230-250, 1998

    73 Khojasteh,M, "Motivating the Private vs. Public Sector Managers" -. 22 : 391-401, 1993

    74 Doyle,M, "Mixed Results,Lousy Process:the Management Experience of Organizational Change," 11 : 59-80, 2000

    75 Kurke,L.E., "Mintzberg Was Right! A Replication and Extension of the Nature of Managerial Work" 29 : 975-984, 1983

    76 Hunter,J.E, "Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings" Sage 2004

    77 Forder, J, "Mental Health: Market Power and Governance" 19 : 877-905, 2000

    78 Lynn,L.E, "Managing the Public's Business" Basic Books 1981

    79 Lynn,L.E, "Managing Public Policy" Little Brown 1987

    80 Bretschneider,S, "Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: an Empirical Test" 50 : 536-545, 1990

    81 Denis,J, "Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity" 17 : 673-699, 1996

    82 Karl,K.A., "Job Values in Today's Workforce: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Employees" 27 : 515-527, 1998

    83 Bogg,J., "Job Satisfaction,Mental Health and Occupational Stress Among Senior Civil Servants" 48 : 327-341, 1995

    84 Frumkin,P., "Institutional Isomorphism and the Public Sector," 14 : 283-307, 2004

    85 Downs,A, "Inside Bureaucracy." Little Brown 1967

    86 Boyne,G, "Human Resource Management in the Public and Private Sectors: An Empirical Comparison" 77 : 407-420, 1999

    87 Davis,E., "Health Benefit Satisfaction In the Public and Private Sectors: The Role of Distributive and Procedural Justice" 24 : 255-270, 1995

    88 Buchanan,B, "Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment" 35 : 339-347, 1974

    89 Lan,Z., "Goals, Rules and Effectiveness in Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions about Differences" 2 : 5-28, 1992

    90 Chun,Y., "Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Fedeal Agencie" 15 : 1-30, 2005

    91 Chun,Y., "Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Fedeal Agencies" 15 : 529-557, 2005

    92 Blau,P.M., "Formal Organizations" Chandler & Sharp. 1962

    93 Perry,J.L, "Factors Affecing the Content for Motivation in Public Organizations" 7 : 89-98, 1982

    94 Holdaway,E, "Dimensions of Organizations in Complex Societies" 20 : 37-58, 1975

    95 Coursey,D., "Decision Making in Public and Private Organizations: A Test of Alternative Concepts of Publicness" 525-535, 1990

    96 Elliot,R., "Computer Literacy and Human Resource Management: A Public/Private Sector Comparison" 28 : 259-274, 1999

    97 Scott,P, "Comparing Public and Private Organizations: an Explanatory Analysis of Three Frameworks" 28 : 126-145, 1998

    98 Rainey,H.G, "Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori" 10 : 447-469, 2000

    99 Rainey,H.G, "Comparing Public and Private Organizations" 36 : 233-244, 1976

    100 Blumenthal,J.M, "Candid Reflections of a Businessman in Washington. In Public Management" Mayfield 1983

    101 Wilson,J.Q, "Bureaucracy" Basic Books. 1989

    102 Palmer,I, "Arts Managers and Managerialism: A Cross-Sector Analysis of CEO's Orientations and Skills" 21 : 433-452, 1998

    103 Bellante,D, "Are Public Sector Workers More Risk Averse Than Private Sector Workers?" 1981

    104 Corder,K, "Acquiring New Technology: Comparing Nonprofit and Public Sector Agencies" 194-219, 2001

    105 Warwick,D.P, "A Theory of Public Bureaucracy" Harvard University Press 1975

    106 Rumsfeld,D, "A Politician-Turned-Executive Surveys Both World. In Public Management" Mayfield 1983

    107 Rawls,J, "A Comparison of Mnagers Entering Or Reentering the Profit and Nonprofit Sectors" 18 : 616-623, 1975

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.18
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.39 1.32 1.39 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼