RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      消費者團體訴訟 = Consumer-related group litigation

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Consumer-related group litigation(""Verbandsklage"" in German) is directly relevant to two incompatible concept: the customer"s (citizen"s) legal protection of life. body. and private properties. and the corporation"s self-protection against the abuse of power to initiate an action. The unlawful use of right to commence litigation may cause the insecurity of either side by undermining the multiple consumers" claim to life. body. and private properties or even by ultimately causing the breakdown of the corporation.
      To minimize its liability. the Consumer Basic Act limits the institute of the group litigation to the group of people who are in charge of the protection of the customer rights as well as to the cases in which the lawful rights of life. body. and private properties of multiple customers is or can be trespassed. The restriction on the plaintiff proclaims the standing to sue in a consumer group litigation and the regulation of the applicable cases proclaims the real parties in interest. The Act constrains that only the institutors who based on the articles of the association always pursue the promotion of the customer rights as the primary goal. retain one thousand or more (or five thousand or more) members. and affiliate themselves with an organization with the record of actual performance for one or longer years (three or longer years). undoubtedly capable of protecting the customer rights. Currently, about 145 organizations are officially qualified for the requirements. The said Act also restricts the range of applicable cases to the ones necessary for the public benefits. including the protection of the legal rights of the customer and the precaution against further damages. For the protection of the corporate defendants and prevention of the suitors" abuse of group litigation. the plaintiffs are fundamentally forbidden to institute second suit once the judgment is given against the them. For the protection of the rights of the customers and the smoothness of their lawsuit process. on the other hand. the Group Litigation law acknowledges the institute against the transgression of customer"s rights as the property-unrelated actions. reducing the lawsuit fee to ₩20,000,100. Such accommodation is an institutional measure to protect the rights of both the customer and the corporation, although it needs to be more and more refined in specific points, especially in regard to the standing to sue and the validity of the judicial decision.
      Even more essential than any other accommodating measures, however, is the consolidation of the producer"s morality on the producers" side and the proper conception of the safe-guarding the customer"s rights on the customer"s side because the law system is elaborated to accommodate the people themselves.
      번역하기

      Consumer-related group litigation(""Verbandsklage"" in German) is directly relevant to two incompatible concept: the customer"s (citizen"s) legal protection of life. body. and private properties. and the corporation"s self-protection against the abu...

      Consumer-related group litigation(""Verbandsklage"" in German) is directly relevant to two incompatible concept: the customer"s (citizen"s) legal protection of life. body. and private properties. and the corporation"s self-protection against the abuse of power to initiate an action. The unlawful use of right to commence litigation may cause the insecurity of either side by undermining the multiple consumers" claim to life. body. and private properties or even by ultimately causing the breakdown of the corporation.
      To minimize its liability. the Consumer Basic Act limits the institute of the group litigation to the group of people who are in charge of the protection of the customer rights as well as to the cases in which the lawful rights of life. body. and private properties of multiple customers is or can be trespassed. The restriction on the plaintiff proclaims the standing to sue in a consumer group litigation and the regulation of the applicable cases proclaims the real parties in interest. The Act constrains that only the institutors who based on the articles of the association always pursue the promotion of the customer rights as the primary goal. retain one thousand or more (or five thousand or more) members. and affiliate themselves with an organization with the record of actual performance for one or longer years (three or longer years). undoubtedly capable of protecting the customer rights. Currently, about 145 organizations are officially qualified for the requirements. The said Act also restricts the range of applicable cases to the ones necessary for the public benefits. including the protection of the legal rights of the customer and the precaution against further damages. For the protection of the corporate defendants and prevention of the suitors" abuse of group litigation. the plaintiffs are fundamentally forbidden to institute second suit once the judgment is given against the them. For the protection of the rights of the customers and the smoothness of their lawsuit process. on the other hand. the Group Litigation law acknowledges the institute against the transgression of customer"s rights as the property-unrelated actions. reducing the lawsuit fee to ₩20,000,100. Such accommodation is an institutional measure to protect the rights of both the customer and the corporation, although it needs to be more and more refined in specific points, especially in regard to the standing to sue and the validity of the judicial decision.
      Even more essential than any other accommodating measures, however, is the consolidation of the producer"s morality on the producers" side and the proper conception of the safe-guarding the customer"s rights on the customer"s side because the law system is elaborated to accommodate the people themselves.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서
      • Ⅱ. 消費者團體訴訟의 保護利益
      • Ⅲ. 消費者團體訴訟의 原告適格
      • Ⅳ. 消費者團體訴訟의 法的 性格
      • Ⅴ. 基本法上의 消費者團體訴訟의 內容
      • Ⅰ. 서
      • Ⅱ. 消費者團體訴訟의 保護利益
      • Ⅲ. 消費者團體訴訟의 原告適格
      • Ⅳ. 消費者團體訴訟의 法的 性格
      • Ⅴ. 基本法上의 消費者團體訴訟의 內容
      • Ⅵ. 消費者團體訴訟의 濫用問題
      • Ⅶ. 結論
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
      2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
      영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼