RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동아시아의 사회진화론 재고 ― 중국과 한국의 ‘진화’ 개념의 형성 = RETHINKING SOCIAL DARWINISM THAT PREVAILED IN EAST ASIA

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107799712

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The most popular Western theory that East Asian intellectuals have continued to actively seek for and tried to understand appropriately since the mid-19th century, was Social Darwinism. This theory also served as the most important philosophical background for all the enlightened intellectuals in the early days of the modern era. From Social Darwinism, Intellectuals tried to find a new perspective that would be effective in viewing both the world and history. As we can imagine, Western philosophies such as Social Darwinism widely circulated in multiple fashions throughout East Asia, and sparked a series of intellectual stimuli among the intellectuals.
      Studies that are determined to examine the status and function occupied by Social Darwinism in East Asia should consider the factor of regional differences among areas that witnessed and accepted Social Darwinism, or variables in the individuals' personal situations who were involved in studying that theory. Yan Fu, who first introduced Social Darwinism to China, recognized that the Western value system itself was embedded inside Social Darwinism. He translated the English term 'evolution' into 'tianyan'(天演) in Chinese. And at this point, he also presented the notion of 'progress' to the Chinese people. In the meantime, a scholar named Liang Qichao, discussed the concept of progress strictly in terms of the interest of the society and the nation, instead of the interest of individuals. And he wished to construct a new nation through an organic unification and upon a strong social order.
      During the national opening period, the Korean intellectuals imported the concepts of competition and progress. The Korean intellectuals accepted Social Darwinism through Liang Qichao, and Liang Qichao embraced Social Darwinism which was filtered through Japanese scholars. So, in order to properly understand and appropriately analyze Social Darwinism that circulated inside East Asia, this sort of 'dual filtering' should be kept in mind.
      번역하기

      The most popular Western theory that East Asian intellectuals have continued to actively seek for and tried to understand appropriately since the mid-19th century, was Social Darwinism. This theory also served as the most important philosophical backg...

      The most popular Western theory that East Asian intellectuals have continued to actively seek for and tried to understand appropriately since the mid-19th century, was Social Darwinism. This theory also served as the most important philosophical background for all the enlightened intellectuals in the early days of the modern era. From Social Darwinism, Intellectuals tried to find a new perspective that would be effective in viewing both the world and history. As we can imagine, Western philosophies such as Social Darwinism widely circulated in multiple fashions throughout East Asia, and sparked a series of intellectual stimuli among the intellectuals.
      Studies that are determined to examine the status and function occupied by Social Darwinism in East Asia should consider the factor of regional differences among areas that witnessed and accepted Social Darwinism, or variables in the individuals' personal situations who were involved in studying that theory. Yan Fu, who first introduced Social Darwinism to China, recognized that the Western value system itself was embedded inside Social Darwinism. He translated the English term 'evolution' into 'tianyan'(天演) in Chinese. And at this point, he also presented the notion of 'progress' to the Chinese people. In the meantime, a scholar named Liang Qichao, discussed the concept of progress strictly in terms of the interest of the society and the nation, instead of the interest of individuals. And he wished to construct a new nation through an organic unification and upon a strong social order.
      During the national opening period, the Korean intellectuals imported the concepts of competition and progress. The Korean intellectuals accepted Social Darwinism through Liang Qichao, and Liang Qichao embraced Social Darwinism which was filtered through Japanese scholars. So, in order to properly understand and appropriately analyze Social Darwinism that circulated inside East Asia, this sort of 'dual filtering' should be kept in mind.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼