비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 판례 연구 (서울지방법원 2003. 6. 13. 선고, 2003고합237) = A Commentarial Study on the Evaluation of Unlisted Stocks

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The so-called "SK Affairs" came into existence in our society last year of 2003, and it also brought some negative views to the so-called "Chaebols" with the respect of the economic and legal perspectives. In addition, it is generally said that the "SK Affairs" has reflected the questions that there were no fruits for the improvement of corporate governance in Korean enterprises nevertheless the Korean government has gradually tried to make it better since the Korean economic crisis of the late 1997. However, even though the "SK Affairs" brought many social problems not all were blameful in the light of the legal aspects.
The evaluation of the unlisted stocks for the stock exchange between affiliated companies of the SK Group in the “SK Affairs” caused a construction of a misfeasance even though the evaluation of the unlisted stocks in this affairs followed the evaluation method under the related law. Actually, the evaluation method for the unlisted stocks in this affairs had never brought any problems. So almost every corporations in Korea have followed the evaluation method just like the method in this affairs. But the court in this case unprecedently concluded that the evaluation of the unlisted stocks were not fair, so it legally caused the breach of the trust to the corporation. Eventually the court decision of this case gave the Korean corporations hot potatoes. When the corporations take the evaluation method for the unlisted stocks like that in this case, the corporations must take very serious considerations and evaluated all circumstances around the transactions even if the method is allowed under the related law.
This commentary will not examines the specific problems that are included only in the "SK Affairs." Instead this commentary will analyzes ubiquitous methods of the evaluation for the unlisted stocks with the objectivity and principle in order to find out the general standard for the evaluation of the unlisted stocks. Because the problem of the evaluation method for the unlisted stocks is not only to the matter of the specific corporation, the SK group in this case, but also to the matter of all corporations in Korea.
The commentary basically explains the stock exchange case of the SK Affairs, and examines the Supreme Court's precedent cases that are concerned about the evaluation method of the unlisted stocks. The commentary analyzes the general and standard evaluation method for the unlisted stocks under the Korean related laws, and examines the specific method of evaluation for the unlisted stocks in this case in order to find out what is wrong in this case. Finally the commentary proposes some schemes for the betterment of the evaluation method for the unlisted stocks.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 대상판결
• Ⅱ. 비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 논의
• Ⅲ. 본 사건에 있어서의 평가방법
• Ⅳ. 맺음말: 비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 개선점
• 참 고 문 헌
• 【ABSTRACT】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "회계수치에 의한 가격결정모형" 20 (20): 1995

2 "회계발생액과 현금흐름의 가치관련성에 대한 연구" 2000

3 "현행세법상 주식평가의 문제점과 개선방안" 1998

4 "판례평석: 비상장주식의 가액" 경원대학교 (4) : 1997

5 "주식처분세제에 관한 실증연구" (7) : 1996

6 "주식매수청구권" 2002

7 "자산재평가와 회계정보 유용성에 관한 실증적 분석" 22 (22): 1997

8 "시장행위와 법적 책임" 1 (1): 2003

9 "시장행위에 대한 사법적 심사" 2003

10 "세법상 시가의 고찰 특별법연구Ⅳ" 법문사 4 : 1994

11 "세법상 비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 연구 세무와 회계저널" 1 (1): 2000

12 "세법상 비상장주식에 대한 보충적 평가방법의 적정성" 25 (25): 2000

13 "상속증여세법상 자산평가방법의 문제점과 개선방안" 2003

14 "상속세법의 비상장주식 평가와 회계변수 평가모형의 유용성" 23 (23): 1998

15 "상속세법상 상속재산의 평가방법과 소급감정" 2002

16 "상속세법상 비상장주식의 평가에 대한 실무적 고찰" 428 : 2002

17 "상속세법상 비상장주식 평가방법의 유용성에 관한 연구" 1998

18 "상속세 및 증여세법상 비상장주식 평가방법의 적정성-비상장 외국인투자기업의 실거래가액 분석을 중심으로-" 2000

19 "상속ㆍ증여재산 평가에 있어서 시가에 포함되는 ‘감정가격’의 범위" 서울 행정 법원 2001

20 "비상장주식의 합리적 평가방안" 제411 : 2001.5

21 "비상장주식의 평가에 있어서 회계변수평가모형의 도입 가능성" 16 : 2000

22 "비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 연구" (4) : 1998

23 "비상장주식의 그룹내부거래시 주식의 평가와 법적책임문제" 서울대 금융법센터 (3) : 2004

24 "비상장주식의 가치는 주총에 물어라" 2003

25 "비상장주식 평가의 경제학, 기업과 정부" 평민사 2004

26 "비상장주식 시가평가방법의 비교분석" 145 : 2000

27 "비상장주식 과세평가방법의 합리화방안" 한국경제연구원 1986

28 "비상장법인의 주식평가" 제346 : 1998

29 "기업법의 관점에서 바라 본 SK 사태" 서울대 금융법센터 (3) : 2004

30 "기업가치 평가방법에 관한 연구 Ⅰ" 감정평가연구원 1998

31 "국세통계연보" 국세청 2001

32 "경제판례 해부 결산대담: 대법원은 보수적, 지법ㆍ고법은 진보적" 중앙일보 2004

33 "Tax Valuation by Compromise" 19 : 1963

34 Joel Seligman, "Securities Regulation" 1998

35 "SK 사태와 주식평가이론" 2003

36 "Note, The Fulbright Bill: Extension of Investor Protection to Unlisted Securities" 71 : 1337-, 1958

37 "Messing v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 502" 1967

38 "Commissioner v. Marshall, 125 F.2d 943, 946" 125-, 1942

39 "Buffalo Tool & Die Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 441" 1980