RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    여성정책을 위한 기초적 검토 = A Note toward a Feminist Policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2007841

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this article is to examine the concepts of "women's policy" which have been circulated in the 1980s, and to suggest some basic elements coherent with the concept. In this conceptual examination, we confront with the fact that the diversities and commonalities of individuals and subgroups of women can pose a problem in regarding women as a single category. Unless we have certain agreement on how to view women as one category, the concept of "women's policy" cannot but be a confused one.
    In section one, the current concepts are critically examined and a new concept is proposed. "Women's policy" has so far been understood as: 1) policy, of which objects are women, or 2) women-related policies. In the case of the former, the problem lies with the question of what the basis of the assertion of universality of women is. In the case of the latter, the task is how to establish criteria measuring the influence on women since all policies have direct and indirect influences on all members of society whether intended or not intended. These problems of current concepts point to the fact that some common understanding of women as a group is necessary. By the same vein, we can argue that, since "women's policy" is not limited to women only but related to the social structure on the whole, in terms of the scope and the influence, the term paradoxically moves beyond its own boundary, women.
    Social policy is based on the judgement that social problems and needs are nor in the area of individual responsibilities but in the state or the society, and thus social policy is an outcome of a collective choice to solve the problems and also is a plan of action to carry out the choice. Therefore, women's policy can be explained as a choice and a plan of action to solve women's issues which are not individual women's problems but social issues and problems of the state.
    In section two, three presuppositions composing the basic understanding of women's policy are explained. Firstly, women's basic human rights as well as equal rights of women and men are to be ensured Equal rights ought to be both formal and substantial. Secondly, the existing law, institutions and political processes do not guarantee substantial equal rights. Furthermore, they can even invade women's basic human rights. Thirdly, the existing viewpoints that physiological sex differences justify the present system and order ought to be rejected and instead social methods embracing the differences and at the same time overcoming hierarchical values regarding the differences ought to be pursued.
    In other words, women's policy has aims to realize alternative value Systems and criteria which disconnect sex differences and sexual hierarchies in the law, institutions and political processes, based on the belief of women's basic human rights and equal rights, and analyses of present systems.
    In section three, the existing policies are critically examined based on the concept and prepositions discussed in the previous sections. The Five Year Economic Development Plans, Family Planning policies and other Welfare Policies are briefly examined with the focus on their treatment of women. The common feature is their asexual nature of the conception and their lack of awareness of gender discrimination. In the 1980s political parties present their own women's policies which in itself is a sign of change, although a proper evaluation will have to wait until concrete practice and research are carried out.
    Finally, section four presents the tasks and problems related to devising women's policy. In order to realize absolute human rights and equal rights, it is crucial to take social and physiological differences between men and women. We have to bear in mind that 'who define the differences' is far more important than emphasis on 'the facts of differences.' In order that women can define their own differences, it is necessary to have organized power bases. Defining differences itself is an expression of their power and it implies a great potential of radical challenges against the existing order.
    In sum, a better understanding of women's policy requires a consensus of women as a category which can digest the sameness and differences within the category. At the same time it requires an explanation on the sameness and differences in comparison with men as a category. In order that 'women's policy' can have legitimate reason for being, a fresh approach which can connect women's issues and social issues within a framework and this requires a fundamental restructuring of social, political and philosophical issues.


    번역하기

    The aim of this article is to examine the concepts of "women's policy" which have been circulated in the 1980s, and to suggest some basic elements coherent with the concept. In this conceptual examination, we confront with the fact that the diversitie...

    The aim of this article is to examine the concepts of "women's policy" which have been circulated in the 1980s, and to suggest some basic elements coherent with the concept. In this conceptual examination, we confront with the fact that the diversities and commonalities of individuals and subgroups of women can pose a problem in regarding women as a single category. Unless we have certain agreement on how to view women as one category, the concept of "women's policy" cannot but be a confused one.
    In section one, the current concepts are critically examined and a new concept is proposed. "Women's policy" has so far been understood as: 1) policy, of which objects are women, or 2) women-related policies. In the case of the former, the problem lies with the question of what the basis of the assertion of universality of women is. In the case of the latter, the task is how to establish criteria measuring the influence on women since all policies have direct and indirect influences on all members of society whether intended or not intended. These problems of current concepts point to the fact that some common understanding of women as a group is necessary. By the same vein, we can argue that, since "women's policy" is not limited to women only but related to the social structure on the whole, in terms of the scope and the influence, the term paradoxically moves beyond its own boundary, women.
    Social policy is based on the judgement that social problems and needs are nor in the area of individual responsibilities but in the state or the society, and thus social policy is an outcome of a collective choice to solve the problems and also is a plan of action to carry out the choice. Therefore, women's policy can be explained as a choice and a plan of action to solve women's issues which are not individual women's problems but social issues and problems of the state.
    In section two, three presuppositions composing the basic understanding of women's policy are explained. Firstly, women's basic human rights as well as equal rights of women and men are to be ensured Equal rights ought to be both formal and substantial. Secondly, the existing law, institutions and political processes do not guarantee substantial equal rights. Furthermore, they can even invade women's basic human rights. Thirdly, the existing viewpoints that physiological sex differences justify the present system and order ought to be rejected and instead social methods embracing the differences and at the same time overcoming hierarchical values regarding the differences ought to be pursued.
    In other words, women's policy has aims to realize alternative value Systems and criteria which disconnect sex differences and sexual hierarchies in the law, institutions and political processes, based on the belief of women's basic human rights and equal rights, and analyses of present systems.
    In section three, the existing policies are critically examined based on the concept and prepositions discussed in the previous sections. The Five Year Economic Development Plans, Family Planning policies and other Welfare Policies are briefly examined with the focus on their treatment of women. The common feature is their asexual nature of the conception and their lack of awareness of gender discrimination. In the 1980s political parties present their own women's policies which in itself is a sign of change, although a proper evaluation will have to wait until concrete practice and research are carried out.
    Finally, section four presents the tasks and problems related to devising women's policy. In order to realize absolute human rights and equal rights, it is crucial to take social and physiological differences between men and women. We have to bear in mind that 'who define the differences' is far more important than emphasis on 'the facts of differences.' In order that women can define their own differences, it is necessary to have organized power bases. Defining differences itself is an expression of their power and it implies a great potential of radical challenges against the existing order.
    In sum, a better understanding of women's policy requires a consensus of women as a category which can digest the sameness and differences within the category. At the same time it requires an explanation on the sameness and differences in comparison with men as a category. In order that 'women's policy' can have legitimate reason for being, a fresh approach which can connect women's issues and social issues within a framework and this requires a fundamental restructuring of social, political and philosophical issues.


    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 여성정책의 개념
    • 2. 여성정책의 인식적 기반
    • 3. 기존정책에서의 여성
    • 4. 여성정책 입안의 과제와 문제
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 여성정책의 개념
    • 2. 여성정책의 인식적 기반
    • 3. 기존정책에서의 여성
    • 4. 여성정책 입안의 과제와 문제
    • 참고문헌
    • 영문초록
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼