RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전략과 환경이 중소기업의 제조 아웃소싱에 미치는 영향 = Strategy, Environment, and Manufacturing Outsourcing in Small and Medium Firms

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76470437

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      근래에 들어 아웃소싱은 기업의 지원기능뿐만 아니라 핵심기능에도 활발히 도입되고 있으며, 비용절감 측면을 넘어 전략적 수단으로 활용되고 있다. 그러나 아웃소싱에 대한 기존 연구는 주로 정보시스템, 일반관리 등과 같은 지원기능을 대상으로 기업의 운영효율성 제고를 위한 원가절감이란 측면에 초점을 두고 이루어져왔다. 현실과 연구의 괴리에 대한 인식을 바탕으로, 본 연구는 우리나라 중소기업을 대상으로 제조 아웃소싱의 영향요인을 규명하는데 초점을 두었다. 중소제조업에서 제조아웃소싱은 효과적 환경적응을 위한 전략적 의사결정으로 개념화하고, 전략과 환경이 제조아웃소싱에 미치는 영향을 규명하였다. 연구결과, 마케팅차별화 전략과 기술 차별화 전략은 제조 아웃소싱과 정(+)의 관계가 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 한편, 환경의 동태성은 전략과 제조 아웃소싱의 관계에 대체로 유의한 영향(조절 효과)을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 기술차별화 전략을 사용하는 기업은 환경이 동태적일수록 제조 아웃소싱을 활발히 추진하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 원가주도 전략의 경우에는 환경의 동태성과 상호작용 효과가 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구는 기존 연구와는 달리 제조아웃소싱에 대한 전략과 환경의 영향을 실증적으로 규명하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 전략적 의사결정으로서 아웃소싱에 대한 보다 정교한 개념화와 후속 연구가 이루어지길 기대한다.
    번역하기

      근래에 들어 아웃소싱은 기업의 지원기능뿐만 아니라 핵심기능에도 활발히 도입되고 있으며, 비용절감 측면을 넘어 전략적 수단으로 활용되고 있다. 그러나 아웃소싱에 대한 기존 ...

      근래에 들어 아웃소싱은 기업의 지원기능뿐만 아니라 핵심기능에도 활발히 도입되고 있으며, 비용절감 측면을 넘어 전략적 수단으로 활용되고 있다. 그러나 아웃소싱에 대한 기존 연구는 주로 정보시스템, 일반관리 등과 같은 지원기능을 대상으로 기업의 운영효율성 제고를 위한 원가절감이란 측면에 초점을 두고 이루어져왔다. 현실과 연구의 괴리에 대한 인식을 바탕으로, 본 연구는 우리나라 중소기업을 대상으로 제조 아웃소싱의 영향요인을 규명하는데 초점을 두었다. 중소제조업에서 제조아웃소싱은 효과적 환경적응을 위한 전략적 의사결정으로 개념화하고, 전략과 환경이 제조아웃소싱에 미치는 영향을 규명하였다. 연구결과, 마케팅차별화 전략과 기술 차별화 전략은 제조 아웃소싱과 정(+)의 관계가 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 한편, 환경의 동태성은 전략과 제조 아웃소싱의 관계에 대체로 유의한 영향(조절 효과)을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 기술차별화 전략을 사용하는 기업은 환경이 동태적일수록 제조 아웃소싱을 활발히 추진하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 원가주도 전략의 경우에는 환경의 동태성과 상호작용 효과가 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구는 기존 연구와는 달리 제조아웃소싱에 대한 전략과 환경의 영향을 실증적으로 규명하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 전략적 의사결정으로서 아웃소싱에 대한 보다 정교한 개념화와 후속 연구가 이루어지길 기대한다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study investigates how strategy and environment influence a firm’s manufacturing outsourcing activities. Prior research on outsourcing has focused on supportive functions such as information services, general administration, accounting and maintenance, and has been concerned mostly with large firms. Discussion on outsourcing has usually centered on potential cost savings associated with such functions. Little attention has been paid to the factors that influence the outsourcing decisions of managers in small manufacturing organizations. Now growing practices of outsourcing has not been fully understood due to two primary reasons. First, outsourcing decisions are usually seen as operational decisions with a view to cost reduction. Second, outsourcing contracts are viewed as adversarial, rather than cooperative, relationships. Companies, however, increasingly outsource some of their main functions, depend on outsourcing for strategic benefits as well as lower costs, and have cooperative relationships with their suppliers.<BR>  Recognizing the gap between research and practice, this article focuses on manufacturing outsourcing, which refers to the process of determining which of the numerous manufacturing activities should be given out to an external provider. From a strategic behavior perspective of outsourcing, I suggest that a firm’s decision to outsource its manufacturing should be viewed as a strategic choice to adapt to changing environment and to enhance its competitiveness rather than merely as a way of cost-cutting. I developed the following hypotheses to examine the strategic aspects of manufacturing outsourcing. They are as follows: (1) Business strategy is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities. More specifically: (a) The strategy of technological differentiation is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities, (b) The strategy of marketing differentiation is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities, and (c) The strategy of cost leadership is negatively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities. (2) The relationship between business strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be moderated by perceived environmental dynamism. More specifically: (a) The positive relationship between differentiation strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be stronger in dynamic environments than in stable environments, and (b) The negative relationship between cost leadership strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be stronger in stable environments than in dynamic environments.<BR>  Data were collected through field surveys and complemented by secondary sources in the context of small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. To enhance reliability and validity of the survey data, we conducted direct interviews with top managers of the sample firms. The firms in the sample represent diverse industry sectors, from traditional textile to high-tech electronics. On average, they had 104 employees and had been in operation for 15 years.<BR>  Hypotheses were tested using hierarchical moderated regression analysis. Overall, the study found that competitive strategies are associated with the level of manufacturing outsourcing activity. Specifically, the strategy of marketing differentiation was very significantly related to the level of manufacturing outsourcing after controlling for firm size and years of operation. The strategy of technological differentiation was also positively associated with a firm’s propensity to outsource its manufacturing. However, cost leadership strategy was not related to the level of manufacturing outsourcing. The second hypothesis proposed that these relationships between strategy and manufacturing outsourcing are moderated by perceived environmental dynamism. It was found that the firms using technological differentiat
    번역하기

      This study investigates how strategy and environment influence a firm’s manufacturing outsourcing activities. Prior research on outsourcing has focused on supportive functions such as information services, general administration, account...

      This study investigates how strategy and environment influence a firm’s manufacturing outsourcing activities. Prior research on outsourcing has focused on supportive functions such as information services, general administration, accounting and maintenance, and has been concerned mostly with large firms. Discussion on outsourcing has usually centered on potential cost savings associated with such functions. Little attention has been paid to the factors that influence the outsourcing decisions of managers in small manufacturing organizations. Now growing practices of outsourcing has not been fully understood due to two primary reasons. First, outsourcing decisions are usually seen as operational decisions with a view to cost reduction. Second, outsourcing contracts are viewed as adversarial, rather than cooperative, relationships. Companies, however, increasingly outsource some of their main functions, depend on outsourcing for strategic benefits as well as lower costs, and have cooperative relationships with their suppliers.<BR>  Recognizing the gap between research and practice, this article focuses on manufacturing outsourcing, which refers to the process of determining which of the numerous manufacturing activities should be given out to an external provider. From a strategic behavior perspective of outsourcing, I suggest that a firm’s decision to outsource its manufacturing should be viewed as a strategic choice to adapt to changing environment and to enhance its competitiveness rather than merely as a way of cost-cutting. I developed the following hypotheses to examine the strategic aspects of manufacturing outsourcing. They are as follows: (1) Business strategy is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities. More specifically: (a) The strategy of technological differentiation is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities, (b) The strategy of marketing differentiation is positively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities, and (c) The strategy of cost leadership is negatively related to a firm’s level of manufacturing outsourcing activities. (2) The relationship between business strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be moderated by perceived environmental dynamism. More specifically: (a) The positive relationship between differentiation strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be stronger in dynamic environments than in stable environments, and (b) The negative relationship between cost leadership strategy and manufacturing outsourcing will be stronger in stable environments than in dynamic environments.<BR>  Data were collected through field surveys and complemented by secondary sources in the context of small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. To enhance reliability and validity of the survey data, we conducted direct interviews with top managers of the sample firms. The firms in the sample represent diverse industry sectors, from traditional textile to high-tech electronics. On average, they had 104 employees and had been in operation for 15 years.<BR>  Hypotheses were tested using hierarchical moderated regression analysis. Overall, the study found that competitive strategies are associated with the level of manufacturing outsourcing activity. Specifically, the strategy of marketing differentiation was very significantly related to the level of manufacturing outsourcing after controlling for firm size and years of operation. The strategy of technological differentiation was also positively associated with a firm’s propensity to outsource its manufacturing. However, cost leadership strategy was not related to the level of manufacturing outsourcing. The second hypothesis proposed that these relationships between strategy and manufacturing outsourcing are moderated by perceived environmental dynamism. It was found that the firms using technological differentiat

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 〈초록〉
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설
      Ⅲ. 연구방법
      Ⅳ. 연구 결과
      Ⅴ. 토의 및 시사점
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    • 〈초록〉
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설
      Ⅲ. 연구방법
      Ⅳ. 연구 결과
      Ⅴ. 토의 및 시사점
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Korea Data Bank, "한국중소기업연감" Korea Data Bank 2004

    2 중소기업청, "중소기업실태조사" 서울 2003

    3 Campbell-Hunt, C, "What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis" 21 (21): 127-154, 2000

    4 Kogut, B, "What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning" 7 (7): 502-518, 1996

    5 K. R. Harrigan, "Vertical integration and corporate strategy" 28 (28): 397-425, 1985

    6 Rasheed, A. M. A, "Towards an objective classification scheme for organizational task environments" (3) : 197-206, 1992

    7 Miller, D, "Towards a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts" 18 (18): 1-26, 1981

    8 Grant, R. M, "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm" (17) : 109-122, 1996

    9 Milliken, F. J, "Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect and response uncertainty" (12) : 133-143, 1987

    10 Demsetz, H, "The theory of the firm revisited : The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development" New York: Oxford University Press 159-178, 1991

    1 Korea Data Bank, "한국중소기업연감" Korea Data Bank 2004

    2 중소기업청, "중소기업실태조사" 서울 2003

    3 Campbell-Hunt, C, "What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis" 21 (21): 127-154, 2000

    4 Kogut, B, "What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning" 7 (7): 502-518, 1996

    5 K. R. Harrigan, "Vertical integration and corporate strategy" 28 (28): 397-425, 1985

    6 Rasheed, A. M. A, "Towards an objective classification scheme for organizational task environments" (3) : 197-206, 1992

    7 Miller, D, "Towards a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts" 18 (18): 1-26, 1981

    8 Grant, R. M, "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm" (17) : 109-122, 1996

    9 Milliken, F. J, "Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect and response uncertainty" (12) : 133-143, 1987

    10 Demsetz, H, "The theory of the firm revisited : The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development" New York: Oxford University Press 159-178, 1991

    11 Miller, D, "The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy" (8) : 55-76, 1987

    12 Dyer, J, "The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage" 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

    13 Dess, G. G, "The new corporate architecture" 9 (9): 7-20, 1995

    14 Womack, J. P, "The machine that changed world" New York: Harper Perennial 1990

    15 Nishiguchi, T, "The evolution of Japanese subcontracting" 39 (39): 89-101, 1997

    16 Grover, V, "The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions" (13) : 89-115, 1996

    17 Williamson, O, "The economic institutions of capitalism" New York: Free Press 1985

    18 Prahalad, C. K, "The core competence of the corporation" 68 (68): 79-93, 1990

    19 Barreyre, P. Y, "The concept of ‘impartition’ policies: A different approach to vertical integration strategies" (9) : 507-520, 1988

    20 Poppo, L, "Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services" 19 (19): 853-877, 1998

    21 Quinn, J. B, "Technology in services: Rethinking strategic focus" 31 (31): 79-87, 1990

    22 Cusumano, M. A, "Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and US auto plants" 12 (12): 563-588, 1991

    23 Yun, M, "Subcontracting relations in the Korean automotive industry: Risk sharing and technological capability" (17) : 81-108, 1999

    24 Kimura, F, "Subcontracting and the performance of small and medium firms in Japan." (18) : 163-175, 2002

    25 Ring, P. S, "Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations" (13) : 483-498, 1992

    26 Bourgeois III, L. J, "Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration" (5) : 25-39, 1980

    27 Usdiken, B, "Strategies and boundaries: subcontracting in construction" 9 (9): 633-637, 1988

    28 Miller, D, "Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure" (31) : 544-569, 1988

    29 Quinn, J. B, "Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities" 40 (40): 9-21, 1999

    30 Quinn, J. B, "Strategic outsourcing" 34 (34): 43-55, 1994

    31 Gulati, R, "Strategic networks" 21 (21): 203-215, 2000

    32 Nishiguchi, T, "Strategic industrial sourcing: The Japanese advantage" 1994

    33 Cronbach, L. J, "Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analysis recently proposed" (102) : 414-417, 1987

    34 Dyer, J, "Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry" 17 (17): 271-291, 1996

    35 Semlinger, K, "Small firms and outsourcing as flexibility reservoirs of large firms : he embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks" London, UK: Routledge 161-178, 1993

    36 Nugent, J. B, "Small and medium enterprises in Korea: Achievements, constraints and policy issues" (18) : 85-119, 2002

    37 Podsakoff, P, "Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects" (12) : 531-544, 1986

    38 Miller, D, "Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications" 31 (31): 280-308, 1988

    39 Martin, X, "Recreating and extending Japanese automobile buyer-supplier links in north America" (16) : 589-619, 1995

    40 Lacity, M. C, "Realizing outsourcing expectations: Incredible expectations, credible outcomes" (11) : 7-18, 1994

    41 Miller, D, "Psychological and traditional determinants of structure" 31 (31): 539-560, 1986

    42 Walker, G, "Profit centers, single-source suppliers, and transaction costs" 36 (36): 66-87, 1991

    43 Ang, S, "Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the US banking industry" (224) : 535-552, 1998

    44 Li, H, "Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China" 44 (44): 1123-1134, 2001

    45 Clark, K. B, "Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry" Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1991

    46 Dess, G. G, "Porter’s(1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance" (27) : 467-488, 1984

    47 Heide, J. B, "Performance implications of buyer-seller relationships in industrial markets: A transaction cost explanation" (32) : 57-66, 1995

    48 Mclvor, R, "Partnership sourcing: An organization change management perspective" 36 (36): 12-27, 2000

    49 Benson, J, "Outsourcing decisions: Evidence from Australiabased enterprises" 135 (135): 59-73, 1996

    50 Chalos, P, "Outsourcing decisions and managerial incentives" 29 (29): 901-919, 1998

    51 Gupta, M, "Outsourcing and its impact on operations strategy" 35 (35): 70-76, 1994

    52 Bettis, R, "Outsourcing and industrial decline" 6 (6): 7-22, 1992

    53 Klaas, B. S, "Outsourcing HR: The impact of organizational characteristics" 40 (40): 125-138, 2001

    54 Stroh, L. K, "Outsourcing HR functions: When-and when not-to go outside" 10 (10): 19-29, 2003

    55 Miller, D, "Organizations: A quantum view" Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1984

    56 Jarillo, J. C, "On strategic networks" (9) : 31-41, 1988

    57 Gulati, R, "Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation" 20 (20): 97-420, 1999

    58 Powell, W. W, "Neither market nor hierarchy: Network Forms of organization : Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12" Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 295-336, 1990

    59 Van de Ven, A, "Measuring and assessing organizations" New York: Wiley-Interscience 1980

    60 Gilley, K. M, "Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance" 26 (26): 763-790, 2000

    61 A. M. Knemeyer, "Logistics outsourcing relationships: customer perspectives" 24 (24): 77-109, 2003

    62 Insinga, R. C, "Linking outsourcing to business strategy" 14 (14): 58-70, 2000

    63 Takeishi, A, "Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development" 13 (13): 321-338, 2002

    64 Kogut, B, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology" 3 (3): 383-397, 1992

    65 Kogut, B, "Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives" 9 (9): 319-332, 1988

    66 Kogut, B, "Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire" 37 (37): 19-33, 1991

    67 Dyer, J, "Japanese style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge" (35) : 51-63, 1993

    68 Hemmert, M, "Intermediate organization’ revisited: A framework for the vertical division of labor in manufacturing and the case of the Japanese assembly industries" 8 (8): 487-517, 1999

    69 Parkhe, A, "Interfirm diversity, organizational learning and longevity in global strategic alliances" (22) : 570-601, 1991

    70 Jaccard, J, "Interaction effects in multiple regression" Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1990

    71 Beaumont, N, "Information technology outsourcing in Australia" 15 (15): 14-31, 2002

    72 Lacity, M. C, "Information systems outsourcing: Myths, metaphors, and realities" West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons 1993

    73 Carson, S. J, "Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration" 14 (14): 45-56, 2003

    74 Greer, C. R, "Human resource management outsourcing: The make-or-buy decision" 13 (13): 85-96, 1999

    75 McFarlan, W, "How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance" (36) : 9-23, 1995

    76 Barney, J. B, "How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions" 40 (40): 137-145, 1999

    77 Rao, K, "Global supply chains: Factors influencing outsourcing of logistics functions" 24 (24): 11-19, 1994

    78 Kotabe, M, "Global sourcing strategy: R&D, manufacturing, and marketing interfaces" New York: Quorum 1992

    79 Elger, T, "Global Japanization: Convergence and competition in the organization of the labour process : Global Japanization: The transnational transformation of the labour process" London, UK: Routledge 31-59, 1994

    80 Harrigan, K. R, "Formulating vertical integration strategies" 9 (9): 638-652, 1984

    81 O'Farrell, P. N, "Formation of strategic alliances in business services: Towards a new client-oriented conceptual framework" 19 (19): 133-151, 1999

    82 Park, S. H, "Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups" 45 (45): 527-545, 2002

    83 Barney, J. B, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

    84 Simerly, R. L, "Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test" (21) : 31-49, 2000

    85 Kim, L, "Environment, generic strategies and performance in a rapidly developing country" 31 (31): 802-827, 1988

    86 Jarillo, J. C, "Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources" (4) : 133-147, 1999

    87 Dess, G. G, "Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models" 18 (18): 677-695, 1997

    88 D'Aveni, R, "Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance?" 37 (37): 1167-1206, 1994

    89 Leiblein, M. J, "Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance" 23 (23): 817-834, 2002

    90 Poppo, L, "Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?" 23 (23): 707-725, 2002

    91 Dess, G. G, "Dimensions of organizational task environments" (29) : 52-73, 1984

    92 Ehie, I. C, "Determinants of success in manufacturing outsourcing decisions: A survey study" 42 (42): 31-39, 2001

    93 Ganesan, S, "Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships" 58 (58): 1-19, 1994

    94 Oliver, C, "Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions." 15 (15): 241-265, 1990

    95 Loh, L, "Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis" 9 (9): 7-24, 1992

    96 Wholey, D. R, "Determinants of information technology outsourcing among health maintenance organizations" (4) : 229-239, 2001

    97 Teng, J. T. C, "Decision to outsource information systems function: Testify a strategy-theoretic discrepancy model" 26 (26): 75-103, 1994

    98 Dyer J, "Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case" 21 (21): 345-367, 2000

    99 Van Mieghem, J. A, "Coordinating investment, production, and subcontracting" 45 (45): 954-971, 1999

    100 Miller, D, "Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis" (7) : 237-239, 1986

    101 Song, M, "Competitive forces and strategic choice decisions: An experimental investigation in the United States and Japan" (23) : 969-978, 2002

    102 Porter, M. E, "Competitive Strategy." New York: Free Press 1980

    103 Taylor, C. R, "Competition or compensation: Supplier incentives under the American and Japanese subcontracting systems" 87 (87): 598-618, 1997

    104 Williamson, O, "Comparative economic organizations: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives" 36 (36): 269-296, 1991

    105 Atamturk, A, "Capacity acquisition, subcontracting, and lot sizing" 47 (47): 1081-1100, 2001

    106 Eccles, R. G, "Bureaucratic versus craft administration: The relationship of market structure to the construction firm" (26) : 449-469, 1981

    107 Johnston, R, "Beyond vertical integration: The rise of the value-adding partnership" 66 (66): 94-101, 1988

    108 Lamming, R, "Beyond partnership: Strategies for innovation and lean supply" Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1993

    109 Dussauge, P, "Asymmetric performance: The market share impact of scale and link alliances in the global auto industry" 25 (25): 701-711, 2004

    110 Hoskisson, R. E, "Asset restructuring and business group affiliation in French civil law countries" 25 (25): 525-539, 2004

    111 Miller, A, "Assessing Porter’s (1980) model in terms of its generalizability, accuracy and simplicity" 30 (30): 553-585, 1993

    112 Cohen, J, "Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)" Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1983

    113 Sriram, V, "Antecedents to buyer-seller Collaboration: An analysis from the buyer’s perspective" (25) : 303-320, 1992

    114 Spanos, Y. E, "An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource- based perspective" 22 (22): 907-934, 2001

    115 Lever, S, "An analysis of managerial motivations behind outsourcing practices in human resources" 20 (20): 37-47, 1997

    116 Klein, S, "A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets" (27) : 196-208, 1990

    117 Murray, A. I, "A contingency view of Porter’s generic strategies" 13 (13): 390-400, 1988

    118 Keats, B. W, "A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance" 31 (31): 570-598, 1988

    119 Gutman, G. A, "A Closer look at manufacturing outsourcing" 20 (20): 22-, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
    2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼