퍼지 AHP 적용에 있어서 평가자 신뢰도와 위험인식 성향의 반영 = The Consideration of Evaluator’s Confidence and Risk Attitude in Fuzzy-AHP

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In general, reliability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) depends on pairwise comparison of evaluators. In addition, human judgment on the importance of alternatives or criteria is always imprecise and vague. To cope with these shortcomings, Fuzzy AHP is suggested and used widely recently. But in Fuzzy AHP, it cannot deal with the evaluator’s various attitudes towards risk and confidence owing to evaluator's different expertise and experience. This paper proposes a method for consideration of evaluator’s confidence and risk attitude in Fuzzy AHP. And suggested methods are applied various scenarios to verify the meaningfulness. The result shows that the priority of alternatives can be change through the consideration of evaluator’s confidence and risk attitude.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 곽승준, "퍼지다기준의사결정기법을이용한 댐건설영향에대한지역주민들의의견평가" 국토연구원 38 : 7-121, 2003

2 조승국, "퍼지-계층화 분석법을 적용한 서울시의 쾌적성 평가체계 구축을 위한 가중치 도출" 7 (7): 1-15, 2006

3 "어하준; “AHP 가중치 결정에서의 다수 전문가 의견종합 방법”" 41-51, 1994

4 김승남, "사용자 요구품질 추출과 분류방법의 개선에 관한 연구" 24 (24): 77-82, 2001

5 조근태, "기술대안의 전략적 평가를 위한 AHP 적용에 있어서 평가자 신뢰성을 고려한 가중치 통합" 19 (19): 139-153, 2002

6 문혜선, "국가종합과학기술지수의 도출과 적용 종합지수를 통한 주요 선진국과의 국가과학기술활동 비교" 13 (13): 1-17, 2005

7 Liou, "Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value" 50 : 247-255, 1992

8 Saaty, "Multicriteria Decision Making" RWS Publications 1996

9 Zadeh, "Fuzzy Sets" 338-353, 1965

10 Chang, "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP" 95 (95): 649-655, 1996

11 Lee, "An efficient algorithm for fuzzy weighted average" 87 : 39-45, 1997

12 이덕주, "AHP를 이용한 수출유망 원자력 기술 분야 선정" 12 (12): 271-286, 2004

13 "; “A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory" [10]Laarhoven 229-241, 1983