본 연구는 미국의 학제를 중심으로 초등교육과 중등교육의 수업연한 변천과정을 역사적 배경과 함께 교육적 상황을 기술하고, 새롭게 논의되고 있는 수업연한의 형태와 그와 관련된 쟁점...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76461392
2006
-
371
KCI등재
학술저널
57-83(27쪽)
5
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 미국의 학제를 중심으로 초등교육과 중등교육의 수업연한 변천과정을 역사적 배경과 함께 교육적 상황을 기술하고, 새롭게 논의되고 있는 수업연한의 형태와 그와 관련된 쟁점...
본 연구는 미국의 학제를 중심으로 초등교육과 중등교육의 수업연한 변천과정을 역사적 배경과 함께 교육적 상황을 기술하고, 새롭게 논의되고 있는 수업연한의 형태와 그와 관련된 쟁점을 분석하였다. 미국의 학제 가운데 수업연한의 변화는 크게 두 차례 변화되었다. 20세기 초 전통적인 8-4제에서 고등학교가 분화된 저학년고등학교의 도입으로 6-3-3제가 주를 이루었다가, 20세기 중반 이후 중학교라는 새로운 개념이 도입됨으로 인해 5-3-4제가 주를 이루었다. 최근에는 다시 초등학교와 중학교를 통합하는 유형이 시도되고 있다. 미국 학제의 변천과정을 통해 국내 학제개편 논의에 얻을 수 있는 시사점을 학년구성의 다양성, 중학교 개념과 사춘기 아동에 대한 이해, 수업연환을 전환하기 위한 전략 등을 중심으로 탐색하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study explored historical trends in the grade configuration of the US elementary and secondary schools. Junior high schools emerged in the first few decades of the century and grew in number until the early 1970s, which the junior high school r...
This study explored historical trends in the grade configuration of the US elementary and secondary schools. Junior high schools emerged in the first few decades of the century and grew in number until the early 1970s, which the junior high school replaced the traditional 8-4 pattern with 6-3-3 plan. In the mid 1960s, the decline of the junior high coincided with the rise of the middle school which the 5-3-4 arrangement became the most common pattern of grade configuration. Recently, several urban school districts, such as Milwaukee, Baltimore, and Philadelphia, are abandoning middle school and middle school concepts and building K-8 schools in order to increase academic achievement and create an atmosphere more conducive to learning.
The topics of grade configuration include the following: Which grades should be grouped together in one school? How many grades should be in one school and how many classrooms per grade? How many school transitions will students make during the K-12 years? Based on these issues, the US school organizations are trying to find particular sequence of grade span most cost effective, yielding higher student achievement.
There is a controversy on innovating current school ladder system of public education in Korea. The following implications were discussed. First, when it comes to grade span, diversity rules. At some schools grade span comes about by choice, at others as a result of practical and administrative considerations. Second, no matter which grade span school districts choose, the most important decision is what kind of education they will offer young adolescents. Third, rather than debate which grade span is best for the entire nation, we would be better off finding better ways to reach out to young adolescents underprivileged.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김승보, "인적자원개발과 학제개편" 교육인적자원부 2006
2 교육인적자원부, "농산어촌 소규모학교 통폐합과 적정규모학교 육성 계획" 교육인적자원부 2006
3 Jenkins, "Which school for the fifth grader? Programs and practices in three grade organizations" 8-13, 1992
4 Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, "Turning points:Preparing American youth for the 21st century" Author 1989
5 Tyack, D, "Tinkering toward utopia Century of public school reform" Harvard University Press 1995
6 Kozol, J, "The shame of nation The restoration of apartheid schooling in America" Random House 2005
7 Ciannetti, C, "The roller-coaster years: Raising your child through the maddening yet magical middle school years" Broadway Books 1997
8 Alspaugh,J, "The interaction effect of transition grade to high school with gender and grade level upon dropout rates" 1999
9 Hough, D, "The elemiddle school A model for middle grades reform" 74 (74): 6-9, 1995
10 Offenberg,R, "The efficacy of Philadelphia's K-to-8 schools compared to middle grade schools" 32 (32): 23-29, 2001
1 김승보, "인적자원개발과 학제개편" 교육인적자원부 2006
2 교육인적자원부, "농산어촌 소규모학교 통폐합과 적정규모학교 육성 계획" 교육인적자원부 2006
3 Jenkins, "Which school for the fifth grader? Programs and practices in three grade organizations" 8-13, 1992
4 Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, "Turning points:Preparing American youth for the 21st century" Author 1989
5 Tyack, D, "Tinkering toward utopia Century of public school reform" Harvard University Press 1995
6 Kozol, J, "The shame of nation The restoration of apartheid schooling in America" Random House 2005
7 Ciannetti, C, "The roller-coaster years: Raising your child through the maddening yet magical middle school years" Broadway Books 1997
8 Alspaugh,J, "The interaction effect of transition grade to high school with gender and grade level upon dropout rates" 1999
9 Hough, D, "The elemiddle school A model for middle grades reform" 74 (74): 6-9, 1995
10 Offenberg,R, "The efficacy of Philadelphia's K-to-8 schools compared to middle grade schools" 32 (32): 23-29, 2001
11 Abella, R., "The effects of small K-8 centers compared to large 6-8 schools on student performance" 37 (37): 29-35, 2005
12 National Center for Education Statistics, "The condition of education 2006 in brief" 2006a
13 Cuban, L, "The blackboard and the bottom line: Why schools can't be business" Harvard University Press 2004
14 Mizell, H, "Still crazy after all these years: Grade configuration and the education of young adolescents" 2004
15 Ron, R, "School organization: Grade spanTrends and issues" 2002
16 Hough, D, "R3 Research rhetoric, and reality A study of studies addressing NMSA's 21st Century Research Agenda and This We Believe" National Middle School Association 2003
17 National Center for Education Statistics, "Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching 1987-88 to 1999-2000" Author 2002
18 National Center for Education Statistics, "Public elementary and secondary students, staff, schools, and school districts: School year 2003-04" 2006b
19 Simmon, "Moving into adolescence The impact of pubertal change and school context" 1987
20 Chaker, A, "Middle school goes out of fashion" 2005April
21 Yecke, C, "Mayhem in the middle Why we should shift to K-8" 63 (63): 20-25, 2006
22 National Center for Education Statistics, "Mathematics and science education in eighth grade: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study" Author 2000
23 Ravitch, D, "Left back: A century of failed school reforms" Simon & Schuster 2000
24 Lounsbury,J, "Key characteristics of middle level schools" 1996
25 Beane, J, "Guess again: Will changing the grades save middle-level education" 63 (63): 26-30, 2006
26 Howley, C, "Grade-span configurations Where 6th and 7th grades are assigned may influence student achievement, research suggests" 59 (59): 24-29, 2002
27 McEwin, C.,, "Grade organization trends: America's middle schools in the new century: Status and progress" National Middle School Association 2003
28 Paglin, C., "Grade configuration: Who goes where" Northwest Regional Educational Laborator 1997
29 & Meadow, "Evidence from a predominantly rural state Journal of Research in Rural Education" 58-70, 1992
30 "Digest of Education Statistics" 2 : 1998
31 Turning Points, "Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development Preparing American Youth for the 21st Century Carnegie Corporation of New York" 1989
32 San Antonio,D, "Broadening the world of early adolescents" 63 (63): 8-13, 2006
33 National Association of Secondary School Principals, "Breaking ranks in the middle: Strategies for leading middle level reform" Author 2006
34 National Association of Secondary School Principals, "Breaking ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform" Author 2004
35 Baltimore City SchoolsDivision of ResearchEvaluation, and Accountability, "An examination of K-5, 6-8 versus K-8 grade configurations" Author 2001
36 Tucker, C., "Accountability works: Analysis of performance by grade span of school" 1997
37 Every kid a winner, "Accountability in education" 1970
한국과 스웨덴의 과학, 기술, 공학교육분야에서의 젠더 문제와 성평등정책 비교 분석
헤르만 리츠(H. Lietz)의 교육이념과 교육실천의 주요원리
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.98 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.91 | 0.94 | 1.28 | 0.26 |