쓰기 오류 수정에 관한 연구 = A Study of Teacher’s Feedback on Students’ Errors in Writing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  A traditional assumption has been that written work in foreign language classes must be corrected carefully. If they were not corrected, errors would be deeply ingrained, and it would be difficult for learners to use the language correctly. Feedback has been viewed as a facilitator of learning and provides various kinds of information to the learner. In foreign language learning, this information consists primarily of modifications and upgrade their inter language grammar. Teachers" written feedback is a topic of continuing interest in foreign language teaching. But most experienced writing teachers know that responding to the students" writing can be the most frustrating, difficult and time consuming part of the job. Providing written feedback on student papers is the teachers‘ most crucial task. And it plays an important role in motivating and encouraging students. But in spite of corrections, teachers have found that students continue to repeat the same mistakes. Moreover the return of papers covered with red marks causes disappointment and discouragement on student"s faces. The teacher wonder if lerner"s errors should be corrected. If so, when should learner"s errors be corrected and which error should be corrected? How should learner"s errors be corrected? Who should correct learner"s errors? To this end, this paper will review the researches about these questions. And this paper will discuss and try to find the conclusion on these questions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
  Ⅱ. 쓰기 피드백에 대한 몇 가지 문제 제기
  Ⅲ. 설문조사
  Ⅳ. 논의
  Ⅴ. 결론
  참고 문헌
  부록
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이수민, "한국어 쓰기 교육에서 교사 피드백이 학생 수정에 미치는 영향 연구" 2001

2 김청자, "학습자 중심의 쓰기 교육을 위한 기초 조사와 제언 제13회 국제 한국어교육학회 연구발표회 발표문" 2000

3 Cohen, "he relationship between selected errors" 45-66, 1976

4 Swain, M, "Three functions of output in second language learning" Oxford: Oxford University Press 125-144, 1995

5 Fanselow,J, "The treatment of error in oral work" 10 : 583-593, 1977

6 Long, M. H, "The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition" San Diego: Academic Press 413-468, 1996

7 Schmidt,R, "The role of conciousness in second language learning" 11 : 129-158, 1990

8 Leki,I, "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes" 24 : 203-218, 1991

9 Ferris, "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision" 31 : 315-336, 1997

10 Semke, "The effects of the Red Pen" 1984195-202

11 Seedhouse, P, "The case of the missing no:The relationship between pedagogy and interaction" 47 : 547-583, 1997

12 Cathcart, "Teachers'' Preferences for Correction of Classroom Conversation Errors 41-53 in John F" tesol1976

13 윤선애, "Teachers' attitudes toward error correction in teaching English" 1997

14 A, "Teacher response to student writing Focus on form versus content Research insights for the classroom" Cambridge University Press 178-190, 1990

15 Ferris, D. R, "Teacher commentary on student writing Journal of Second Language Writing Description & implications" 6 (6): 155-182, 1997

16 Ferris, D. R, "Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms" 29 : 33-53, 1995

17 Cohen, "Student processing of feedback on their compositions Learner strategies in languagr learning" Prentice-Hall 57-69, 1987

18 Brandl, K. K, "Strong and weak students' preferences for error feedback options and responses" 79 : 194-211, 1995

19 Robb, "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality" 83-93, 1986

20 Han, Z, "Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching" 33 (33): 1-33, 2002

21 Ferris, D. R, "Response to student writing" Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2003

22 Zamel,V, "Responding to student writing" 19 : 79-102, 1985

23 Sommers,N, "Responding to student writing" 33 : 148-156, 1982

24 Kim, J. H, "Issues of corrective feedback in second language acquisition" 4 : 1-24, 2003

25 Lee,I, "ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing:Some implications for teaching" 25 : 465-477, 1997

26 Mings, "Changing perspectives on the utility of error correction in second language acquisition" 171-179, 1993

27 정혜임, "Attitude toward error correction in adult learners of diverse proficiency levels in EFL" 1997

28 Kepner, "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writion skills" 305-313, 1991

29 Carroll, "An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalization Studies in Second Language Acquisition" 327-351, 1993

30 Chaudron,C, "A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors" 27 : 29-46, 1977