본 연구는 학교의 학습조직화 구축 정도를 진단하기 위한 측정모형을 설정하고 학습조직화 측정도구를 개발하는 데 목적이 있다 학습조직의 구성요소는 구성원의 행동 특성, 학습의 지원 ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107885313
2004
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
23-44(22쪽)
15
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 학교의 학습조직화 구축 정도를 진단하기 위한 측정모형을 설정하고 학습조직화 측정도구를 개발하는 데 목적이 있다 학습조직의 구성요소는 구성원의 행동 특성, 학습의 지원 ...
본 연구는 학교의 학습조직화 구축 정도를 진단하기 위한 측정모형을 설정하고 학습조직화 측정도구를 개발하는 데 목적이 있다 학습조직의 구성요소는 구성원의 행동 특성, 학습의 지원 시스템, 학습의 실천과정으로 분류하여 요소들간의 역학적 관계를 설정하였다, 측정모형에 기초한 측정변인은 신염 체계, 권한 부여, 비전 공유, 전문성 개방, 체제적 사고, 리더십, 조직 구조, 의사소통, 정보 시스템, 지식 창출, 지식 공유, 지식 저장 , 지식 활용으로 구생하였다. 표본선정은 서울정기·인천지역의 초풍학교 교사 798의 질문지를 최종 분석하였다. 측정변인 에 따른 구체적인 문항의 내용은 130개의 예비운항을 선정하여 확인적 요인분석을 통해 최종 80문항을 설별하였다. Cronbach α 계수는 87로 비교적 높은 신뢰도를 보여 활용가능이 있으며, 모형의 적합도 검중에서는 Chi-Square=145.570. df=62, p-value=0.000, RMSEA=0.194로 나타났다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This research aimed at inventing instruments of measurement to diagnose the degree to which schools became more Learning Organized and analyzing the quality of the instruments The results of the research are summarized below. First, in the theoretical...
This research aimed at inventing instruments of measurement to diagnose the degree to which schools became more Learning Organized and analyzing the quality of the instruments The results of the research are summarized below. First, in the theoretical aspect of the research, Learning Organization was ultimately seen as 'the state of constantly growing function.' The components were categorized as the behavioral characteristics of members, supporting systems, and the process of putting the learning into practice. The measuring model was established with 13 factors as the measuring variables for the Learning Organization: belief systems, empowering the authority, sharing the vision, development of professionalism, systematic thinking, leadership, the structure of the organization, communication, information system, and creating, sharing, storing, and utilizing knowledge. Second, in the methodological aspect of the research, these teachers were selected from elementary schools in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon. For the final examinations, the answers were collected from 798 teachers who worked in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon. Furthermore, as a way to increase the quality of the instruments of measurement, the content validity was proven, and the chosen 130 questions were utilized. Cronbach's a coefficients were obtained to verify the reliability and validity of the instruments, and their ranges for each factor were from .81 to .91. In addition, factors that have the eigen value of 1.0 or over were extracted from the varimax rotation in the factor analysis. Finally, the results of the research with respect to the application of the instruments are as follows. In this research, the affirmative factor analysis, which proved the suitability of the model, showed Chi-Square=145.570, df=62, p-value=0.000, and RMSEA=0.l94.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "학습조직이론의 교육조직에의 적용에 관한 탐색연구" 15 (15): 571-579, 1997
2 "학습조직의 촉진요인 및 실천요인 분석" 1999
3 "학습조직의 이론과 실제: 학습조직과 시스템 사고," 삼성경제연구소 181-210, 1996
4 "미래의 학교지도자가 가져야 할 가치관" 19 (19): 406-407, 2001
5 "practice of the learning organization" Currency Doubleday 1990a
6 "inproving School effectiveness." Open University press 2001
7 "The stages systemic change" 51 (51): 14-17, 1993
8 "The learning university" 6 (6): 9-17, 1999
9 "The basic school: A community for learning." The Carnegie Foundation: 1995
10 "The School as a learning organization: Distant dreams." 34 (34): 230-235, 1995
1 "학습조직이론의 교육조직에의 적용에 관한 탐색연구" 15 (15): 571-579, 1997
2 "학습조직의 촉진요인 및 실천요인 분석" 1999
3 "학습조직의 이론과 실제: 학습조직과 시스템 사고," 삼성경제연구소 181-210, 1996
4 "미래의 학교지도자가 가져야 할 가치관" 19 (19): 406-407, 2001
5 "practice of the learning organization" Currency Doubleday 1990a
6 "inproving School effectiveness." Open University press 2001
7 "The stages systemic change" 51 (51): 14-17, 1993
8 "The learning university" 6 (6): 9-17, 1999
9 "The basic school: A community for learning." The Carnegie Foundation: 1995
10 "The School as a learning organization: Distant dreams." 34 (34): 230-235, 1995
11 "Some reactions to what we have learned" 77 (77): 84-85, 1995
12 "Senge의 학습조직이론의 학교 적용에 관한 연구" 22 (22): 67-68, 2004
13 "Schools that learn" Dutton Doubleday 2000
14 "Schools as "learning organizations(Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University, 1998)." 61 : 2000
15 "School-Based Management as School Reform." Corwin Press 1995
16 "Re-educating the Corporation Foundation for the Learning Organization" publications : 1993
17 "Re-Creating School." Corwin Press 1998
18 "Overcoming organizational defenses:facilitating organizational learning" Allyn and Bacon 1990
19 "Organizational learning: The international Journal of Educational Management" 15 (15): 78-85, 2001
20 "Organizational learning Ⅱ: theory, Method and practice." Addison Wesley. 1996
21 "On schools as learning organization: A conversation with Peter Senge." 52 (52): 20-23, 1995
22 "Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Technical report (2nd ed.)." Mind Garden. 2000
23 "Making Schools Smarter." Corwin Press Inc 2000
24 Coe, M. A., "Learning organizations and the innovative/effective middle school, Doctoral dissertation." The Pennsylvania State University 1998
25 "Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work." Harvard Business School Press 2000
26 "Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes." Allyn and Bacon. 2001
27 "Images of organization. (2nd ed.)." Sage Publications 1997
28 "Hardwaring the Organization" 8 : 1997
29 "Effective Change in School." Cambridge University Press 2000
30 "Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.)." McGaw-Hill, Inc. 2001
31 "Building the learning organization." McGraw- Hill 1996
32 "Building community in schools" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1994
33 "Aligning an organization for leaning: The six principles of effective learning management" 1 (1): 308-314, 1998
34 "Achieving your vision of professional development. (3rd ed.)." Serve. 2000
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 1.78 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.92 | 2.06 | 1.843 | 0.17 |