RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      학교안전사고와 손해배상책임 = Safety-related accidents in School and Indemnification

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76447840

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Safety-related accidents in school refer the accidents from which students who are educatees got damaged or fell into the victims regardless of directly relation to school education. However, although a school pays a careful attention, the occurrence of Safety-related accidents in School is inevitable in the course of proceeding school curriculum and pursuing education purpose since students are immature physically and mentally. Here, when these kinds of accidents happen, what scope of legal responsibility a school should be charged for?
      Safety-related accidents in school can be classified according to the followings; locus of responsibility, the when and the where of accident, types of accident, and damage suffered. The scope of responsibility can be different according to specific duties of protection and supervision. A school has a duty to care for safety, considering the acts of students and their scope existing. However, in case that safety accidents outbreak at school due to natural disaster during extracurricular activities, it is difficult to clarify the scope of responsibility a school should be charged for. Accidents occurred during extracurricular activities, most of which are sports accidents, are especially considered complicated of the safety-related accidents in school. Since sports include inevitable danger, it is too severe to blame teachers for the accidents, which discourages extracurricular activities. However, since it is also important to save the victims, any breach of duty of care shall be determined by the criteria that neither discourage club activities nor neglect to help victims, comprehensively considering the possibility of avoiding the results, contributory negligence, and force majeure.
      The responsibility of Indemnification for safety-related accidents in school can be charged as a breach of duty of care for educational safety under the contract between students, a person in parental authority and a school founder, its manager in case of private schools. The trust relationship for education can be broken in the course for students and a person in parental authority to verify teachers’ faults for struggling to figure unlawful acts out. In addition, to acknowledge teachers’ breach of duty of care easily can shrink contents of education and limit students’ autonomous activities, resulting in harming educational creativity and the possibility of future growth. From these points, it seems desirable to constitute such default as a breach of duty of care for safety of a school founder or its manager.
      번역하기

      Safety-related accidents in school refer the accidents from which students who are educatees got damaged or fell into the victims regardless of directly relation to school education. However, although a school pays a careful attention, the occurrence ...

      Safety-related accidents in school refer the accidents from which students who are educatees got damaged or fell into the victims regardless of directly relation to school education. However, although a school pays a careful attention, the occurrence of Safety-related accidents in School is inevitable in the course of proceeding school curriculum and pursuing education purpose since students are immature physically and mentally. Here, when these kinds of accidents happen, what scope of legal responsibility a school should be charged for?
      Safety-related accidents in school can be classified according to the followings; locus of responsibility, the when and the where of accident, types of accident, and damage suffered. The scope of responsibility can be different according to specific duties of protection and supervision. A school has a duty to care for safety, considering the acts of students and their scope existing. However, in case that safety accidents outbreak at school due to natural disaster during extracurricular activities, it is difficult to clarify the scope of responsibility a school should be charged for. Accidents occurred during extracurricular activities, most of which are sports accidents, are especially considered complicated of the safety-related accidents in school. Since sports include inevitable danger, it is too severe to blame teachers for the accidents, which discourages extracurricular activities. However, since it is also important to save the victims, any breach of duty of care shall be determined by the criteria that neither discourage club activities nor neglect to help victims, comprehensively considering the possibility of avoiding the results, contributory negligence, and force majeure.
      The responsibility of Indemnification for safety-related accidents in school can be charged as a breach of duty of care for educational safety under the contract between students, a person in parental authority and a school founder, its manager in case of private schools. The trust relationship for education can be broken in the course for students and a person in parental authority to verify teachers’ faults for struggling to figure unlawful acts out. In addition, to acknowledge teachers’ breach of duty of care easily can shrink contents of education and limit students’ autonomous activities, resulting in harming educational creativity and the possibility of future growth. From these points, it seems desirable to constitute such default as a breach of duty of care for safety of a school founder or its manager.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 학교안전사고로 인한 손해배상책임의 근거
      • Ⅲ. 학교측의 보호·감독의무의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 학교안전사고와 채무불이행책임
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 학교안전사고로 인한 손해배상책임의 근거
      • Ⅲ. 학교측의 보호·감독의무의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 학교안전사고와 채무불이행책임
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • 참고 문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김동현, "학교안전사고의 실태와 교원의 법적 책임에 관한 연구" 수원대학교 1998

      2 김태완, "학교안전사고에 따른 교원의 책임범위와 교권침해" 대한교육법학회 16 (16): 27-54, 2004

      3 오정균, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임과 대처방안" 충북대학교 1992

      4 정일용, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임 고찰" 서울대학교 1989

      5 김종택, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적 책임과 인식에 관한 연구" 한국교원대학교 1997

      6 김도형, "학교안전사고 보상제도의 법제화에 관한 소고" 16 (16): 2007

      7 윤인태, "학교사고의 손해배상책임" 1 : 1999

      8 정종규, "학교사고의 법적 처리에 관한 사례 연구" 중앙대학교 1990

      9 한은숙, "학교사고와 손해배상책임" 12 : 1998

      10 김관수, "학교사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임에 관한 연구" 전북대학교 1985

      1 김동현, "학교안전사고의 실태와 교원의 법적 책임에 관한 연구" 수원대학교 1998

      2 김태완, "학교안전사고에 따른 교원의 책임범위와 교권침해" 대한교육법학회 16 (16): 27-54, 2004

      3 오정균, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임과 대처방안" 충북대학교 1992

      4 정일용, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임 고찰" 서울대학교 1989

      5 김종택, "학교안전사고에 대한 교원의 법적 책임과 인식에 관한 연구" 한국교원대학교 1997

      6 김도형, "학교안전사고 보상제도의 법제화에 관한 소고" 16 (16): 2007

      7 윤인태, "학교사고의 손해배상책임" 1 : 1999

      8 정종규, "학교사고의 법적 처리에 관한 사례 연구" 중앙대학교 1990

      9 한은숙, "학교사고와 손해배상책임" 12 : 1998

      10 김관수, "학교사고에 대한 교원의 법적책임에 관한 연구" 전북대학교 1985

      11 이정식, "학교사고에 대한 교사 등의 손해배상책임의 법리와 주의의무" 18 : 2002

      12 하윤수, "학교사고로 인한 손해배상책임" (4) : 1995

      13 강일원, "학교사고로 인한 민사책임" 중앙대학교 2004

      14 정상현, "책임능력있는 미성년자의 불법행위에 대한 감독자책임의 근거 재해석" 539 : 2001

      15 정광수, "책임능력있는 미성년자의 불법행위에 대한 감독자의 책임" 10 : 1998

      16 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2007

      17 권용우, "불법행위론" 신양사 1998

      18 이정식, "민법상 학교사고에 대한 교사 등의 손해배상책임" 5 : 2002

      19 이명갑, "민법 제758조의 불법행위법체계상의 의의와 위치" (130) : 1987

      20 김철용, "국가배상과 공무원의 개인책임" (230) : 1976

      21 兼子仁, "教育法" 有斐閣 1978

      22 平井宣雄, "損害賠償法の理論" 東京大学出版会 1979

      23 高橋真, "安全配慮義務の研究" 成文堂 1992

      24 奥野久雄, "学校教育契約" 59 (59):

      25 伊藤進, "学校事故賠償責任の判例法理" (354) :

      26 今村成也, "学校事故の法的責任" (4) :

      27 伊藤進, "学校事故の法律責任" 三省堂 1983

      28 鍋山健, "学校における部活動中の事故と不法行為責任, 不法行為訴訟法(2)" 青林書院 1987

      29 沢井裕, "公海の私法的研究" 一粒社 1969

      30 我妻栄, "債権総論" 岩波書店 1972

      31 加藤一朗, "事務管理の企業責任" ダイヤモンド社 1968

      32 潮見佳男, "不法行為法" 信山社 2005

      33 滝沢聿代, "不法行為における過失·違法性(下)" (849) :

      34 四宮和夫, "不法行為" 青林書院 1990

      35 하윤수, "『학교안전사고예방 및 보상법』에 관한 주된 내용과 문제점" 13 (13): 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Association For Korean Law Of Property -> THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE JOURNAL OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.71 0.86 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼