RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      보장국가론의 전개와 헌법적 의의

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76446957

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Facing innovative development of technologies and an unavoidable information society, it is necessary to have deep reconsideration on what kind of roles a State has to play. This essay includes analysis of the concept of ‘Ensuring State’('Gewährleistungsstaat' in German), which has been designated in Germany as the result of examination on the flow of informatization, privatization, and globalization, and analysis of meanings and contents of 'Ensuring Responsibility' which is suggested as a key idea to understand the Ensuring State. Through the concept of Ensuring State, characteristics of laws and regulations which are the measures for this State to play its role, this essay examines the changing phase and roles of States.
      The Ensuring State do not directly provide benefits for their people’s livelihood, but entrust civil organizations to play the role to deal public tasks on condition that the States support, mediate the process and establish appropriate legal frameworks. The Ensuring State provide structural frameworks to let social autonomy work smoothly and in this way, the State shares the responsibility and cooperate with private sector making sure of concrete public interests. Although the State which takes the Ensuring Responsibility entrust the promotion of public interests to private sector, still bear the responsibility to realization of concrete justice. Accordingly, laws of the Ensuring State perform the duty of instituting the corporate responsibility and expanding the social autonomy.
      The discussion about the Ensuring State in Germany is worthy of our notice because it offers basic material for the debate on desirable roles of a state in the Information Society. It is, However, needed to study continually for the discussion to appropriately realize in our society.
      번역하기

      Facing innovative development of technologies and an unavoidable information society, it is necessary to have deep reconsideration on what kind of roles a State has to play. This essay includes analysis of the concept of ‘Ensuring State’('Gewä...

      Facing innovative development of technologies and an unavoidable information society, it is necessary to have deep reconsideration on what kind of roles a State has to play. This essay includes analysis of the concept of ‘Ensuring State’('Gewährleistungsstaat' in German), which has been designated in Germany as the result of examination on the flow of informatization, privatization, and globalization, and analysis of meanings and contents of 'Ensuring Responsibility' which is suggested as a key idea to understand the Ensuring State. Through the concept of Ensuring State, characteristics of laws and regulations which are the measures for this State to play its role, this essay examines the changing phase and roles of States.
      The Ensuring State do not directly provide benefits for their people’s livelihood, but entrust civil organizations to play the role to deal public tasks on condition that the States support, mediate the process and establish appropriate legal frameworks. The Ensuring State provide structural frameworks to let social autonomy work smoothly and in this way, the State shares the responsibility and cooperate with private sector making sure of concrete public interests. Although the State which takes the Ensuring Responsibility entrust the promotion of public interests to private sector, still bear the responsibility to realization of concrete justice. Accordingly, laws of the Ensuring State perform the duty of instituting the corporate responsibility and expanding the social autonomy.
      The discussion about the Ensuring State in Germany is worthy of our notice because it offers basic material for the debate on desirable roles of a state in the Information Society. It is, However, needed to study continually for the discussion to appropriately realize in our society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김일환, "헌법상 새로운 정보질서확립을 위한 서설적 고찰" 7 (7): 2001

      2 김일환, "첨단과학기술사회에서 憲法의 役割과 機能에 관한 試論的 考察" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 287-307, 2007

      3 Frank Webster, "정보사회이론" 나남 2007

      4 김상겸, "사회국가원리에 관한 고찰 -독일 기본법상의 전개과정과 논의를 중심으로" 7 (7): 2001

      5 김민호, "공공서비스의 민간위탁과 공기업의 민영화" 한국토지공법학회 25 : 267-285, 2005

      6 Thomas Vesting, "Zwischen Gewäahrleistungsstaat und Minimalstaat. in Verwaltungsrecht in der Informationsgesellschaft" Nomos 2000

      7 Hans-Heinrich Trute, "Verantwortungsteilung als Schlüsselbegriff . in Jenseits von Privatisierung und schlankem Staat" Nomos 1999

      8 Georg Hermes, "Staatliche Infrastrukturverantwortung" Mohr Siebeck 1998

      9 Georg Müller, "Rechtssetzung im Gewährleistungsstaat. in StaatㆍKircheㆍVerwaltung: Festschrift für Hartmut Maurer zum 70" C.H. Beck 2001

      10 Wolfgang Weiß, "Privatisierung und Staatsaufgaben: Privatisierungsentscheidungen im Lichte einer grundrechtlichen Staatsaufgabenlehre unter dem Grundgesetz" Mohr Siebeck 2002

      1 김일환, "헌법상 새로운 정보질서확립을 위한 서설적 고찰" 7 (7): 2001

      2 김일환, "첨단과학기술사회에서 憲法의 役割과 機能에 관한 試論的 考察" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 287-307, 2007

      3 Frank Webster, "정보사회이론" 나남 2007

      4 김상겸, "사회국가원리에 관한 고찰 -독일 기본법상의 전개과정과 논의를 중심으로" 7 (7): 2001

      5 김민호, "공공서비스의 민간위탁과 공기업의 민영화" 한국토지공법학회 25 : 267-285, 2005

      6 Thomas Vesting, "Zwischen Gewäahrleistungsstaat und Minimalstaat. in Verwaltungsrecht in der Informationsgesellschaft" Nomos 2000

      7 Hans-Heinrich Trute, "Verantwortungsteilung als Schlüsselbegriff . in Jenseits von Privatisierung und schlankem Staat" Nomos 1999

      8 Georg Hermes, "Staatliche Infrastrukturverantwortung" Mohr Siebeck 1998

      9 Georg Müller, "Rechtssetzung im Gewährleistungsstaat. in StaatㆍKircheㆍVerwaltung: Festschrift für Hartmut Maurer zum 70" C.H. Beck 2001

      10 Wolfgang Weiß, "Privatisierung und Staatsaufgaben: Privatisierungsentscheidungen im Lichte einer grundrechtlichen Staatsaufgabenlehre unter dem Grundgesetz" Mohr Siebeck 2002

      11 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Modernisierung von Recht und Justiz: Eine Herausforderung des Gewährleistungsstaates" Suhrkamp 2001

      12 Gabriele Britz, "Kommunale Gewährleistungsverantwortung -ein allgemeines Element der Regulierung in Europa?" 37 : 2004

      13 Michael Kloepfer, "Informationsrecht" Verlag C.H.Beck 2002

      14 Martin Eifert, "Grundversorgung mit Telekommunikationsleistungen im Gwährleistungsstaat" Nomos 1998

      15 Georg Hermes, "Gewährleistungsverantwortung als Infrastrukturverantwortung. in Der Gewährleistungsstaat -Ein Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand" Nomos 2005

      16 Gunnar Folke Schuppert, "Die öffentliche Verwaltung im Kooperationsspektrum staatlicher und privater Aufgabenerfüllung: Zum Denken in Verantwortungsstufen" 31 : 1998

      17 Reinhard Ruge, "Die Gewährleistungsverantwortung des Staates und der Regulatory State: Zur veränderten Rolle des Staates nach der Deregulierung der Stromwirtschaft in Deutschland, Großbritannien und der EU" Duncker & Humblot 2004

      18 Dieter Grimm, "Der Wandel der Staatsaufgaben und die Krise des Rechtsstaats. in Wachsend Staatsaufgaben-sinkende Steuerungsfahigkeit des Rechts" Nomos 1990

      19 Matthias Knauff, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat: Reform der Daseinsvorsorge: eine rechtswissenschaftliche Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des ÖPNV" Duncker & Humblot 2004

      20 Claudio Franzius, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat –Ein neues Leitbild für den sich wandelnden Staat?,?, Der Staat Bd.42 Hf.4" Duncker & Humblot 2003

      21 Gunnar Folke Schuppert, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat -modisches Label oder Leitbild sich wandelnder Staatlichkeit?. in Der Gewährleistungsstaat -Ein Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand" Nomos 2005

      22 Claudio Franzius, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat"

      23 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, "Das Recht des Gewährleistungsstaates. in Der Gewährleistungsstaat -Ein Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand" Nomos 2005

      24 Christoph Reichard, "Das Konzept des Gewährleistungsstaates, Referat auf der Jahrestagung 2003 des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats der GÖW"

      25 Gunnar Folke Schuppert, "Das Konzept der regulierten Selbstregulierung als Bestandteil einer als Regelungswissenschaft verstandenen Rechtswissenschaft" Duncker & Humblot 4 : 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.87 0.967 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼