초등학교 수행평가 활동 전반의 타당성에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the performance assessment with a holistic approach for the elementary school in Korea. The performance assessment is divided into five stages: (1) planning the performance assessment, (2) developing and selecting performance tasks, (3) implementing and operating the assessment, (4) interpreting and utilizing the results of the performance assessment, (5) exploring the effect of the performance assessment on education. The eight criteria used for the validation are as follows: The accordance to national guidances and regulations, content validity, internal validity, instructional validity, the appropriateness of the amount of time and effort for conducting the performance assessment, the reliability of scoring, the degree of the utilizing the results, and the consequence validity.
The results of this study indicated that the overall validity of the performance assessment conducted in the elementary school of Korea was considerably low. The planning and administration of the performance assessment are very superficial, and performance tasks are also limited to measuring basic knowledge and skills of students. Furthermore the administration is too frequent to think about the quality of performance tasks, and it makes elementary school teachers overloaded. Based on the results of the study, the researchers propose the following suggestions for improving the performance assessment conducted in the elementary school of Korea; (1) redefining the right meaning of the performance assessment, (2) reforming the grading system of the elementary school, (3) developing high quality performance tasks, and (4) conducting the performance assessment with reasonable frequency.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김성숙, "타당도와 신뢰도에 대한 새로운 의미. 한국교육평가의 쟁점과 대안" 교육과학사 2000

2 안인수, "초등학교의 수행평가 실시현황 분석" 안동대학교 교육대학원 2001

3 조영기, "초등학교 수행평가 실시현황 및 개선방안-부산시 초등학교 사례를 중심으로-" 한국교육평가학회 20 (20): 77-99, 2007

4 임말지, "초등학교 수행평가 시행 및 교사들의 인식 실태조사" 공주교육대학교 교육대학원 2002

5 김경희, "초등수학과 수행평가의 타당도 검증" 13 (13): 77-105, 2000

6 성태제, "초등교육 수행평가의 장애요인 분석과 개선안" 38 (38): 153-184, 2000

7 교육인적자원부, "초·중등학교 수행평가 현장 적용 평가 및 개선 방안 연구" 교육인적자원부 2001

8 남명호, "수행평가의 타당성 연구: 과학실기 평가, 실험보고서 평가, 컴퓨터시뮬레이션 평가의 비교" 8 (8): 115-143, 1995

9 교육인적자원부, "수행평가의 이해"

10 국립교육평가원, "수행평가의 이론과 실제" 대한교과서주식회사 1996

11 교육인적자원부, "수행평가의 문제점과 개선 방향"

12 김명숙, "수행평가의 가치와 질 관리" 14 (14): 17-46, 2001

13 백순근, "수행평가:이론적 측면" 교육과학사 2002

14 남명호, "수행평가: 이해와 적용" 문음사 2000

15 배호순, "수행평가 타당화 논리의 탐색" 12 (12): 125-151, 1999

16 한국교육과정평가원, "수행평가 정책 시행 실태 분석과 개선 대책 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 1999

17 교육인적자원부, "수행평가 이렇게 한다"

18 대구시교육청, "대구학업성적관리규정"

19 교육인적자원부, "교육인적자원부 훈령 제719호"

20 교육인적자원부, "교육비젼 2002" 교육인적자원부 2002a

21 성태제, "검사나 평가활동에 대한 메타평가적 관점에서의 결과타당도" 한국교육학회 41 (41): 5-110, 2003

22 Messick,S, "Validity. In Educational measurement" McMillan 13-103, 1989

23 Stiggins,R.J, "Student-centered classroom assessment" Macmillan 1994

24 Haertel,E, "Performance measurement. In Encyclopedia of educational research" Macmillan 954-988, 1996

25 Wiggins,G, "Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance" Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers 1998

26 Linn, R, "Complex, performance-based assessment: expectation and validataion criteria" 20 (20): 15-21, 1991

27 McMillan,J.H, "Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction(4th ed.)" Allyn & Bacon 2007

28 Linn, R, "Can performance-based students assessment be psychometrically sound? In Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities 95th Yearbook of the NSSE, Part I" University of Chicago Press 84-103, 1996

29 Tombari, M, "Authentic assessment in the classroom: Application and practice" Prentice-Hall 1999

30 Frederiksen, J. R, "A systems approach to educational testing" 18 (18): 27-32, 1989

31 교육인적자원부, "2002학년도 대학입시제도 개선안"