토지법제의 체계화 방안에 대한 연구 = A Study on the Systematization of Land Law System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The land system should be supplemented to improve it to the level satisfying its increasing demand and desire.
Land laws must conform to the concept of land ownership and progresses to drastically ease the restrictions which are being applied in a uniform manner. In other words priority should be given to the macroscopic land development and its use so that such development or use of land may lead to the creation of a living environment of the residents and a industrial base, that are closely linked to the community in question.
The land system should not be regulated indiscriminately on the basis of the uniform standards. Dramatic improvements in the land system need to be made so that it may flexibly conform to the definite features of a particular piece of land. Each law has its own characteristics and peculiarities, and for this reason it is wise to
determine the characteristics of each piece of land to devise an appropriate system for that particular piece of land.
The current land laws should make a gradual advance towards the systematization. For such systematization the land regulation of various types needs to be linked to one another. Particularly such measures as easing of land ownership as in easing of farmland ownership, centralization of the land licensing system, systematization of the land system's restrictions, and relaxation of the licensing system of the land dealings, need to be implemented.
Various laws regulating the land ownership, its development and use should be unified into a single law. Particularly diversified land laws need to be unified and systematized. To achieve such unification of the land laws, the licensing and restriction system of land must be centralized so that any licensing or restrictions may be granted or applied based on a single, unified law.
Also such laws regulating the land need to be improved so that they may be applied and implemented democratically. For this, a definite base should be provided in a law so that the provisions of such a law may not be subject to an arbitrary interpretation by an administrative office. Also decisions based on such a law should allow the resident to participate in the decision-making process and encourage the private hands to actively participate in the use of land and its development. At the same time it should encourage a measure designed to actively compensate for the loss incurred as a result of the administrative restriction of land.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The land system should be supplemented to improve it to the level satisfying its increasing demand and desire.
Land laws must conform to the concept of land ownership and progresses to drastically ease the restrictions which are being applied in a uniform manner. In other words priority should be given to the macroscopic land development and its use so that such development or use of land may lead to the creation of a living environment of the residents and a industrial base, that are closely linked to the community in question.
The land system should not be regulated indiscriminately on the basis of the uniform standards. Dramatic improvements in the land system need to be made so that it may flexibly conform to the definite features of a particular piece of land. Each law has its own characteristics and peculiarities, and for this reason it is wise to
determine the characteristics of each piece of land to devise an appropriate system for that particular piece of land.
The current land laws should make a gradual advance towards the systematization. For such systematization the land regulation of various types needs to be linked to one another. Particularly such measures as easing of land ownership as in easing of farmland ownership, centralization of the land licensing system, systematization of the land system's restrictions, and relaxation of the licensing system of the land dealings, need to be implemented.
Various laws regulating the land ownership, its development and use should be unified into a single law. Particularly diversified land laws need to be unified and systematized. To achieve such unification of the land laws, the licensing and restriction system of land must be centralized so that any licensing or restrictions may be granted or applied based on a single, unified law.
Also such laws regulating the land need to be improved so that they may be applied and implemented democratically. For this, a definite base should be provided in a law so that the provisions of such a law may not be subject to an arbitrary interpretation by an administrative office. Also decisions based on such a law should allow the resident to participate in the decision-making process and encourage the private hands to actively participate in the use of land and its development. At the same time it should encourage a measure designed to actively compensate for the loss incurred as a result of the administrative restriction of land.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박평준, "현행법상 공용제한에 대한 보상제도의 문제점" 3 : 1996

2 박평준, "현행법상 공용수용에 대한 보상제도의 문제점" 5 : 1998

3 유하백, "현행 토지수용제도상 기본권 침해성에 관한 고찰" 10 : 2000

4 김해룡, "현행 건축허가절차의 문제점" 2 : 1996

5 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2007

6 김문현, "헌법과 토지기본법" 1990

7 이기한, "행정청의 토지이용 규제의 권한과 한계" 18 : 2003

8 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2007

9 강현호, "행정법총론"

10 김남진, "행정법의 탈규제화 경향" 2 : 1996

11 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2007

12 김성수, "행정법(Ⅰ)" 법문사 2001

13 김남진, "행정법 Ⅰ" 법문사 2001

14 김동희, "행정법" 박영사 2007

15 이광윤, "한국의 토지계획법규범의 구조와 문제점" 한국토지공법학회 24 : 63-74, 2004

16 김재덕, "토지소유권제한의 이론" 경영문화원 1983

17 김규하, "토지소유권의 보장과 제한" 5 : 1998

18 김남진, "토지소유권의 법적 성질" 한국행정과학연구소 (13) : 1980

19 홍완식, "토지법제에 대한 입법론적 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 35 : 205-223, 2007

20 김해룡, "토지법의 기초이론" 한국토지공법학회 20 : 1-16, 2003

21 김상용, "토지법" 법원사 2004

22 김해룡, "토지관련법제의 법적 문제와 개선방안" 7 : 1999

23 유해웅, "토지공법론" 삼영사 2004

24 김경열, "토지공법" 사법행정문화원 1997

25 서순탁, "토지거래허가제의 운용실태와 실효성 제고방안" 33 : 2006

26 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 1995

27 佐藤英善, "일본에 있어서의 토지정책,토지법제와 규제완화" 4 : 1997

28 석종현, "일반행정법(상,하)" 삼영사 2005

29 천 영, "우리나라 토지법제의 변천과정 고찰" 한국부동산학회 9 : 1990

30 최영규, "영업허가의 개념과 범위" 21 : 196-,

31 김철수, "신헌법학개론" 박영사 2001

32 김경열, "신토지공법" 경영문화원 1992

33 이광윤, "손실보상제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 7 : 1999

34 석종현, "손실보상법제에 관한 검토" 16 (16): 2002

35 유해웅, "새로운 국토계획관련법제에 대한 평가와 개선방향 토론요지법" 15 : 2002

36 김해룡, "새로운 국토계획 관련법제에 대한 평가와 개선방안" 15 : 2002

37 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 1982

38 송동수, "독일에 있어 토지에 관한 공익과 사익의 조정" 16 (16): 2002

39 강현호, "독일 연방건설법상의 토지수용제도에 대하여" 5 : 1998

40 김성원, "도시계획과 재산권의 보장" 2 : 1996

41 정연주, "공익사업을위한토지등의취득및보상에관한법률에 대한 헌법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 16 (16): 1-44, 2002

42 김용섭, "개발허가의 법적 성질" 13 : 2001

43 김재호, "개발제한구역의 지정과 행정상손실보상" 4 : 1997

44 김남욱, "개발부담금제도에 관한 고찰" 10 : 2000

45 雄川一郞, "野宏. 園部逸夫編" 現代行政法大案 1983

46 兼 子 仁, "行政法總論"

47 遠藤傳也, "行政法 II" 名論 1980

48 藤田宙靖, "行政法 I" 總論 1983

49 齊藤壽, "梅木崇" 現代行政法論 1982

50 高田賢造, "新訂 土地收用法" 日本評論社 1970

51 정남철, "土地利用規制基本法의 內容 및 法的 問題點" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 417-442, 2006

52 水本, "土地所有權 の 規則, 民法 の 爭點, ジェリスト" 有斐閣 1978

53 "和田英夫 : 行政法講義 : 上"

54 "和田英夫 : 新版行政法"

55 정준현, "「국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률」상 토지이용규제의 법적 문제 - 행정중심복합도시특별법 포함 -" 한국토지공법학회 26 : 23-42, 2005

56 Redecker, "verwaltungsgerichtsordnung" Kommentar 1986

57 "Walter Jellinek : Verwaltungsrecht : 1928 : 3. Aufl. 1931 : Neud 1966"

58 H. J. Knack, "Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz" Kommentar 1994

59 C.H. Ule, "Verwaltungsverfahren im rechrsstaat"

60 H, J. Wolff, "Verwaltungsrecht Ⅰ" 1994

61 "Ule/Laubinger : Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht : 2. Aufl"

62 C.H., "Ule : VerwaltungsprozeBrecht" Aufl 1978

63 C.H., "Ule : Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit : Kommentar zur Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung" Aufl 1960

64 "Tschirra/Schmitt Glaeser, Verwaltungsprozessrecht"

65 E. Forsthhoff, "Lehrbuch des Verwaltungsrechts bd. 1 Allgemeiner Teil" Munchen 1973

66 Klaus Obermeyer, "Grundztige des Verwaltunfsrechts und des Verwaltungsproze Brechts 2" Aufl 1975

67 "Ernst Forsthoff, Lehrbuch des Verwaltungsrechts"

68 Otto Mayer, "Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht" Band Ⅰ 1923

69 F. Mayer, "Allgemeiness Verwaltungsrecht, Athenaum" Konigstein/Ts 1982

70 H. U. Erichsen, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht"

71 H. Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht"

72 Dieter Schmalz, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" teil 1-2, 1988

73 F. Mayer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" 1985