RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조직내 활력관계(Energizing Relationships)의 결정요인에 관한 탐색적 연구 = What Facilitates Energizing Relationships in Organizations? : Perspectives from Multiple Levels

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443009

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행동의 준비상태 및 동기부여된 상태에 도달된 관계를 ‘조직내 활력관계(energizing relationships)’ 개념(Baker, Cross & Wooten, 2003)을 이용하여 설명하였다. 본 연구는 조직내 활력 관계의 개념적 틀을 마련하고, 조직내 활력관계의 형성 과정을 세 가지 인지적 요인?자율성, 역량, 소속감에 대한 인식 ? 을 이용하여 제시하였다. 더 나아가, 세 가지 인지적 요인을 강화시킬 수 있는 관계적 속성들을 두 개인간 관계의 강도, 짐멜 관계의 존재여부, 그리고 조직내 감정규범의 존재여부의 관점에서 탐색하였다. 끝으로 조직내 활력관계에 관한 연구가 감정의 공유 연구, 동기부여 연구, 그리고 사회연결망 연구에 주는 이론적 시사점과 향후 연구방향, 그리고 조직에 주는 시사점을 논의하였다.
    번역하기

      본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행...

      본 연구는 기존의 감정의 공유(shared affect) 문헌에서 제시하는 개인간 유사한 감정의 공유 단계에서 한 단계 더 나아가, 개인간 상호작용을 통해 긍정적인 감정이 증폭, 강화되어 행동의 준비상태 및 동기부여된 상태에 도달된 관계를 ‘조직내 활력관계(energizing relationships)’ 개념(Baker, Cross & Wooten, 2003)을 이용하여 설명하였다. 본 연구는 조직내 활력 관계의 개념적 틀을 마련하고, 조직내 활력관계의 형성 과정을 세 가지 인지적 요인?자율성, 역량, 소속감에 대한 인식 ? 을 이용하여 제시하였다. 더 나아가, 세 가지 인지적 요인을 강화시킬 수 있는 관계적 속성들을 두 개인간 관계의 강도, 짐멜 관계의 존재여부, 그리고 조직내 감정규범의 존재여부의 관점에서 탐색하였다. 끝으로 조직내 활력관계에 관한 연구가 감정의 공유 연구, 동기부여 연구, 그리고 사회연결망 연구에 주는 이론적 시사점과 향후 연구방향, 그리고 조직에 주는 시사점을 논의하였다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Why do certain interpersonal relationships energize and inspire people involved in the relationships while some other relationships de?energize and dishearten those involved in the relationships? Building on the concept of energizing relationships(Baker, Cross, & Wooten, 2003), we develop a conceptual framework that defines energizing relationships in organizations. We distinguish between shared positive affect and energizing relationships in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emotional contagion among unspecified individuals, whereas energizing relationships arise from cognitive interpretation of shared positive affect, especially with respect to autonomy, competence, and belongingness. Second, energizing relationships develop from shared positive affect when emotional contagion occurs through individually meaningful social relationships. We then explore the mediating role of cognitive mechanisms between shared positive affect and energizing relationships and suggest the sense of autonomy, competence, and belongingness as three key cognitive mechanisms. Moreover, we further the moderating effects of individual social relationships on the interplay of shared positive affect and three cognitive mechanisms. In particular, we examine these effects by paying attention to the following three aspects of social relations: tie strength, Simmelian tie, and emotional norm. Finally, we discuss the theoretical contributions of this research to group emotion, motivation, and network literatures, as well as the future research directions and practical implications.<BR>  Energizing relationships<BR>  Organizational and psychological researchers have recently begun to explore emotion as a collective property of groups. They have mainly focused on how group members come to share similar emotions or moods and on the consequences of the shared emotions and moods. However, sometimes individuals may experience their emotions strengthened and amplified during interpersonal interactions above and beyond the level of sharing similar emotions with the interaction partner. For example, a team leader who is sharing a calm emotion with a team member, makes an enthusiastic comment or suggestion to the team member. When this happens, we may expect that the team member would feel excited and perhaps even more enthusiastic than the team leader, and that the member would be motivated to act in ways that fulfill the emotions of excitement and enthusiasm. As such, (a) when individuals experience their positive emotions strengthened and amplified through an individually meaningful interpersonal interaction, and (b) when they feel that they are ready to act in the direction motivated by the positive emotions experienced through the interpersonal interaction, we define this specific type of interpersonal relationship as an energizing relationship in organizations.<BR>  Energizing relationships have the following important characteristics. The first is that compared with ‘shared positive affect’, energizing relationships involve shared positive emotions being strengthened and amplified through interpersonal interactions. The strengthening and amplification of originally shared positive emotions can happen either to one or to both interacting partners. Second, energizing relationships consist of individuals behaviorally activated or ready to take certain actions. Specific emotions entail specific action tendencies, and motivation to act becomes stronger as individuals experience strong and high arousal emotions (Frijda, 1986). Thus, strong positive emotions experienced through energizing relationships can facilitate motivation to act in ways that correspond to emotions and their associated action tendencies. Furthermore, energizing relationships differ from shared positive affect in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emoti
    번역하기

      Why do certain interpersonal relationships energize and inspire people involved in the relationships while some other relationships de?energize and dishearten those involved in the relationships? Building on the concept of energizing relat...

      Why do certain interpersonal relationships energize and inspire people involved in the relationships while some other relationships de?energize and dishearten those involved in the relationships? Building on the concept of energizing relationships(Baker, Cross, & Wooten, 2003), we develop a conceptual framework that defines energizing relationships in organizations. We distinguish between shared positive affect and energizing relationships in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emotional contagion among unspecified individuals, whereas energizing relationships arise from cognitive interpretation of shared positive affect, especially with respect to autonomy, competence, and belongingness. Second, energizing relationships develop from shared positive affect when emotional contagion occurs through individually meaningful social relationships. We then explore the mediating role of cognitive mechanisms between shared positive affect and energizing relationships and suggest the sense of autonomy, competence, and belongingness as three key cognitive mechanisms. Moreover, we further the moderating effects of individual social relationships on the interplay of shared positive affect and three cognitive mechanisms. In particular, we examine these effects by paying attention to the following three aspects of social relations: tie strength, Simmelian tie, and emotional norm. Finally, we discuss the theoretical contributions of this research to group emotion, motivation, and network literatures, as well as the future research directions and practical implications.<BR>  Energizing relationships<BR>  Organizational and psychological researchers have recently begun to explore emotion as a collective property of groups. They have mainly focused on how group members come to share similar emotions or moods and on the consequences of the shared emotions and moods. However, sometimes individuals may experience their emotions strengthened and amplified during interpersonal interactions above and beyond the level of sharing similar emotions with the interaction partner. For example, a team leader who is sharing a calm emotion with a team member, makes an enthusiastic comment or suggestion to the team member. When this happens, we may expect that the team member would feel excited and perhaps even more enthusiastic than the team leader, and that the member would be motivated to act in ways that fulfill the emotions of excitement and enthusiasm. As such, (a) when individuals experience their positive emotions strengthened and amplified through an individually meaningful interpersonal interaction, and (b) when they feel that they are ready to act in the direction motivated by the positive emotions experienced through the interpersonal interaction, we define this specific type of interpersonal relationship as an energizing relationship in organizations.<BR>  Energizing relationships have the following important characteristics. The first is that compared with ‘shared positive affect’, energizing relationships involve shared positive emotions being strengthened and amplified through interpersonal interactions. The strengthening and amplification of originally shared positive emotions can happen either to one or to both interacting partners. Second, energizing relationships consist of individuals behaviorally activated or ready to take certain actions. Specific emotions entail specific action tendencies, and motivation to act becomes stronger as individuals experience strong and high arousal emotions (Frijda, 1986). Thus, strong positive emotions experienced through energizing relationships can facilitate motivation to act in ways that correspond to emotions and their associated action tendencies. Furthermore, energizing relationships differ from shared positive affect in the following two ways. First, shared positive affect results from unconscious emoti

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 〈초록〉
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 감정공유 관계로부터 조직내 활력관계로의 발전
      Ⅲ. 논의
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    • 〈초록〉
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 감정공유 관계로부터 조직내 활력관계로의 발전
      Ⅲ. 논의
      참고문헌
      ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 La Guardia, J. G, "Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need-fulfillment and well-being" 79 : 367-384, 2000

    2 Cross, R, "What creates energy in organizations?" 44 : 51-56, 2003

    3 Deci, E. L, "The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" 11 : 227-268, 2000

    4 Krackhardt,D, "The tie that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations" 16 : 183-210, 1999

    5 Granovetter,M, "The strength of weak ties" 78 : 1360-1380, 1973

    6 Krackhardt,D, "The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations, Networks and Organizations" 216-239, 1992

    7 Hansen,M, "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits" 44 : 82-111, 1999

    8 Seo, M, "The role of affective experience in work motivation" 29 : 423-439, 2004

    9 Barsade,S.G, "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002

    10 Dutton, J. E, "The power of high quality connections, Positive Organizational Scholarship" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 263-278, 2003

    1 La Guardia, J. G, "Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need-fulfillment and well-being" 79 : 367-384, 2000

    2 Cross, R, "What creates energy in organizations?" 44 : 51-56, 2003

    3 Deci, E. L, "The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" 11 : 227-268, 2000

    4 Krackhardt,D, "The tie that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations" 16 : 183-210, 1999

    5 Granovetter,M, "The strength of weak ties" 78 : 1360-1380, 1973

    6 Krackhardt,D, "The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations, Networks and Organizations" 216-239, 1992

    7 Hansen,M, "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits" 44 : 82-111, 1999

    8 Seo, M, "The role of affective experience in work motivation" 29 : 423-439, 2004

    9 Barsade,S.G, "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002

    10 Dutton, J. E, "The power of high quality connections, Positive Organizational Scholarship" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 263-278, 2003

    11 Borgatti, S. P, "The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology" 29 : 991-1013, 2003

    12 Baumeister, R. F, "The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation" 117 : 497-529, 1995

    13 Barrick, M. R, "The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups" 50 : 544-557, 2007

    14 Frijda,N.H, "The emotions" Cambridge University Press 1986

    15 Saxton,T, "The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes" 40 : 443-461, 1997

    16 Langfred,C.W, "The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams" 50 : 885-900, 2007

    17 Sy, T, "The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes" 90 : 295-305, 2005

    18 Bartel, C. A, "The collective construction of work group moods" 45 : 197-231, 2000

    19 Seers, A, "Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment" 20 : 18-38, 1995

    20 Brass, D, "Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective" 47 : 795-819, 2004

    21 Zukin, S, "Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy" Cambridge University Press 1990

    22 Krackhardt, D, "Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms" 24 : 279-290, 2002

    23 Moran,P, "Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance" 26 : 1129-1151, 2005

    24 Gump, B. B, "Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion" 72 : 305-319, 1997

    25 Rook,K.S, "Social support versus companionship: Effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others" 52 : 1132-1147, 1987

    26 Wasserman, S, "Social network analysis: Methods and application" Cambridge University Press 1994

    27 Adler, P. S, "Social capital: Prospects for a new concept" 27 : 17-40, 2002

    28 Nahpiet, J, "Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage" 23 : 242-266, 1998

    29 Coleman,J.S, "Social capital in the creation of human capital" 94 : S95-S120, 1988

    30 Pugh,S.D, "Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter" 44 : 1018-1027, 2001

    31 Ryan, R. M, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being" 55 : 68-78, 2000

    32 Reagans,R, "Preferences, identity, and competition:�Predicting tie strength from demographic data" 51 : 1374-1383, 2005

    33 Baker, W, "Positive organizational network analysis and energizing relationships" Berrett-Koehler Publishers 328-842, 2003

    34 Cohen, S, "Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress" 13 : 99-125, 1983

    35 George,J.M, "Personality, affect, and behavior in groups" 75 : 107-116, 1990

    36 Ibarra,H, "Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework" 18 : 56-88, 1993

    37 Grolnick, W. S, "Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school" 2 : 143-154, 1989

    38 Powell,W, "On the nature of institutional embeddedness: Labels vs explanation" 13 : 293-300, 1996

    39 Collins,R, "On the micro-foundations of macro-sociology" 86 : 984-1014, 1981

    40 Ryan, R. M, "On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being" 65 : 529-566, 1997

    41 Granovetter,M, "Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action" Harvard Business School Press 25-56, 1992

    42 Lawler, E, "Network structure and emotion in exchange relations" 63 : 871-894, 1998

    43 Marks,S.R., "Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment" 42 : 921-936, 1977

    44 Kelly, J. R, "Mood and emotions in small group and work teams" 86 : 99-130, 2001

    45 Marsden, P, "Measuring tie strength" 63 : 482-501, 1984

    46 Baard, P, "Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivation basis of performance and well-being in two work settings" 34 : 2045-2068, 2004

    47 Baum, J. A. C, "Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations" 57 : 540-559, 1992

    48 Meyer, B, "Happiness and despair on the catwalk: Need satisfaction, well-being, and personality adjustment among fashion models" 2 : 2-17, 2007

    49 Ryan, R. M, "From ego-depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self" Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008

    50 Izard,C.E, "Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes" 100 : 68-90, 1993

    51 Christophe, V, "Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing" 27 : 37-54, 1997

    52 Totterdell, P, "Evidence of mood linkage in work groups" 74 : 1504-1515, 1998

    53 Quinn, R. W, "Energizing others in work connections, Exploring positive relationships at work" Lawrence Earlbaum 73-90, 2007

    54 Parkinson,B, "Emotions are social" 87 : 663-683, 1996

    55 Anderson, C, "Emotional convergence between people over time" 84 : 1054-1068, 2003

    56 Schoenewolf,G, "Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups" 15 : 49-61, 1990

    57 Tesser,A, "Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes, Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research" Erlbaum 117-148, 1991

    58 Hess, U, "Emotion expression in groups, Handbook of emotions (2nd Ed)" Guilford Press 368-381, 2000

    59 Frijda,N.H, "Emotion experience" 19 : 473-497, 2005

    60 Lazarus,R.S, "Emotion and adaptation" Oxford University Press 1991

    61 Granovetter,M, "Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness" 91 : 481-510, 1985

    62 Watson, D, "Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales" 54 : 1063-1070, 1988

    63 Reis, H. T, "Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness" 26 : 419-435, 2000

    64 Quinn, R. W, "Coordination as energy-in-conversation" 30 : 36-57, 2005

    65 Totterdell,P, "Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams" 85 : 848-859, 2000

    66 Klein, S. S, "An integrative review of material possession attachment" 1 : 1-39, 2004

    67 Martin, J, "An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at the Body Shop" 43 : 429-469, 1998

    68 Lawler,E, "An affect theory of social exchange" 107 : 321-52, 2001

    69 Totterdell, P, "Affect networks: A structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect" 89 : 854-867, 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
    2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼