양형에 있어서 피해자의 역할 = A Study on the Role of Victims in a Sentencing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  The discussion on sentencing is becoming the hot issue in a learned circle and practical business. Those discussions basically come up with an issue up to the judge"s discretionary assessment. Hence, an irrationality of the sentencing would be brought out for a rational and transparent (objective)guidelines dismissing irrationality relevant to sentencing.<BR>  Meanwhile, most crimes generate by an interaction between a victim and a perpetrator. Therefore, as determining the punishment, unless all the circumstances related to the victim should be considered, it is impossible to judge the whole circumstances relevant to a crime accurately. In accordance with that, the victim"s role should be considered in the course of a sentencing. From the view that a crime is a results of a mechanical interaction between victim and perpetrator, the judgment of the victim"s role against the perpetrator"s illegality and responsibility takes a critical part in sentencing. In spite of that, according to the Article of Criminal Code 51-2, it regulates the matter only as to "relation with victim". The law, however, just leave the examination on the victim in the lump as judge"s discretion relevant to judgments. Whereupon, it should be raised more concrete and segmental new guideline for the objective and rational sentencing, notfollowing existing judgement. With the matter, we will look into the victim"s role as a factor of sentencing which decreases illegality and responsibility related to a crime. First, we defined the concept among the polysemy of the victim and followed a sentencing course detaily. On the basis of such system, examining the victim"s role in sentencing, we especially inquired into a contributive extent of the victim to a crime as the other party by types.<BR>  It is necessary that the sentencing theory should be tried to find out the concept which is more precisely and intersubjectively verifiable about the circumstances relevant to "relation with victim. It could offer the judges to the right material of sentencing and also provide the perpetrator as well as victims and their familes to the persuasive sentencing. Besides, a right guidelines for a victimological study would also be offered.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
  Ⅱ. 양형기준으로서의 피해자
  Ⅲ. 양형책임에 관련한 피해자
  Ⅳ. 피해자의 범죄에의 기여
  Ⅴ. 마치는 글
  Abstract
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 原田 國男, "量刑判斷の實際"

2 原田 國男, "量刑判斷の實際" 現代法律出版 2003

3 原田 國男, "量刑判斷の 實際" 現代法律出版 2003

4 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고"

5 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고" 한국피해자학회 14 (14): 5-22, 2006

6 박광민, "형사절차상 피해자의 지위강화"

7 박광민, "형사절차상 피해자의 지위강화" (10) : 202-203,

8 이재상, "형법총론" 박영사 2005

9 신동운, "형법총론" 법문사 2008

10 오영근, "형법총론" 박영사 2007

11 정성근, "형법총론" 삼지사 2008

12 김일수, "형법총론" 박영사 2007

13 김성돈, "형법총론"

14 박상기, "형법총론" 박영사 2007

15 배종대, "형법총론" 홍문사 2008

16 정웅섭, "형법강의" 대명출판사 2006

17 이용식, "형벌론과 형사실체법에서 피해자의 역할" 한국피해자학회 15 (15): 93-110, 2007

18 이용식, "형벌론과 형사실체법에서 피해자의 역할"

19 최석윤, "피해자의 승낙과 양형"

20 진계호, "피해자의 승낙"

21 장영민, "피해자의 승낙" 고시계 1994

22 박광민, "전게논문"

23 박일환, "전게논문"

24 이주영, "우리나라에 적합한 양형기준제"

25 김성돈, "우리나라 피해자학의 연구동향" (7) : 102-,

26 박일환, "양형에서의 피해자에 대한 고려" (2) : 58-, 1993

27 박일환, "양형에서의 피해자에 대한 고려"

28 최석윤, "양형에서 피해자의 의미" 7 (7): 24-25,

29 최석윤, "양형에 대한 기초적 이론" 8 (8): -287, 1997

30 松岡正章, "被害者側の挑發と量刑"

31 塩谷 毅, "被害者の承諾と自己答責性" 法律文化社 2004

32 坪井祐子, "被害者∙關係者∙第3者の落ち度が量刑に及ぼす影響"

33 坪井祐子, "被害者∙關係者∙第3者の落ち度が量刑に及ぼす影響"

34 坪井祐子, "被害者∙關係者∙第3者の落ち度が量刑に及ぼす影響"

35 生田勝義, "挑發と量刑"

36 坪井祐子, "前揭論文"

37 松岡正章, "前揭書"

38 佐伯千仭, "前揭書"

39 塩谷 毅, "前揭書"

40 原田 國男, "前揭書"

41 坪井祐子, "前揭書"

42 森下忠, "刑事政策大綱[新版第2版" 成文堂 1996

43 佐伯千仭, "刑の量定の基準"

44 松尾浩也, "刑の量定" 1 : 337-,