RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조약체결에 관한 국회의 통제권

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76440385

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

        The treaty is defined as ‘the written agreement between the nations.’ It constitutes international law with ‘the generally recognized rules of international law.’ Article 6 Section 1 of Korean Constitution explicates ‘Doctrine of Respecting International Law Order’ and acknowledges a treaty"s force same as a domestic law by prescribing “Treaties duly concluded and promulgated under the Constitution and the generally recognized rules of international law shall have the same effect as the domestic laws of the Republic of Korea.” In addition, Article 60 Section 1 of Korean Constitution enumerates the important treaties that need the consent by National Assembly as a democratic control in the conclusion and ratification of the treaties.<BR>  Like this, the treaty is a norm to which Korean Constitution gives domestic force. It is also a norm which would give more and more impact to Korean people"s life due to the development of globalization, and, further, could limit the constitutional rights of Korean people. Considering these facts, I believe that in-depth constitutional studies on National Assembly"s control power in treaty-making are fairly needy and urgent.<BR>  In this paper, I will closely examine governmental practices in real world as well as scholarly theories and judicial decisions on the contents and scopes of treaty-concluding and treaty-ratifying powers of the President and consenting power of National Assembly on treaty-making as a control power for the checks and balances. In addition, I will analyze and review ‘the congressional bills on treaty-making process’ which were submitted to National Assembly last year and explore the way to strengthen the National Assembly"s control power on treaty-making from the standpoint of a desirable power distribution between the President and National Assembly. Finally, in terms of strengthening National Assembly"s control power in treaty-making, I will reveal the problems on official announcement of sanitation standard in importing beef from the United States which caused so-called ‘candle rallies’ by Korean people until couple of months ago.
      번역하기

        The treaty is defined as ‘the written agreement between the nations.’ It constitutes international law with ‘the generally recognized rules of international law.’ Article 6 Section 1 of Korean Constitution explicates ‘Doctrine of...

        The treaty is defined as ‘the written agreement between the nations.’ It constitutes international law with ‘the generally recognized rules of international law.’ Article 6 Section 1 of Korean Constitution explicates ‘Doctrine of Respecting International Law Order’ and acknowledges a treaty"s force same as a domestic law by prescribing “Treaties duly concluded and promulgated under the Constitution and the generally recognized rules of international law shall have the same effect as the domestic laws of the Republic of Korea.” In addition, Article 60 Section 1 of Korean Constitution enumerates the important treaties that need the consent by National Assembly as a democratic control in the conclusion and ratification of the treaties.<BR>  Like this, the treaty is a norm to which Korean Constitution gives domestic force. It is also a norm which would give more and more impact to Korean people"s life due to the development of globalization, and, further, could limit the constitutional rights of Korean people. Considering these facts, I believe that in-depth constitutional studies on National Assembly"s control power in treaty-making are fairly needy and urgent.<BR>  In this paper, I will closely examine governmental practices in real world as well as scholarly theories and judicial decisions on the contents and scopes of treaty-concluding and treaty-ratifying powers of the President and consenting power of National Assembly on treaty-making as a control power for the checks and balances. In addition, I will analyze and review ‘the congressional bills on treaty-making process’ which were submitted to National Assembly last year and explore the way to strengthen the National Assembly"s control power on treaty-making from the standpoint of a desirable power distribution between the President and National Assembly. Finally, in terms of strengthening National Assembly"s control power in treaty-making, I will reveal the problems on official announcement of sanitation standard in importing beef from the United States which caused so-called ‘candle rallies’ by Korean people until couple of months ago.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼