RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인 = Factors Associated with Analyst Following and Forecast Characteristics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95942051

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study compares the forecast accuracy of analysts and random walk model forecasts. Previous studies find that analysts do not forecast more accurately than the random walk model when controlling the forecast timing advantage for analysts. However, most studies didn`t use earnings forecasts published in analysts` individual firm reports. Therefore, we re-examine the forecast ability of analysts using earnings forecasts in individual firm reports. Also, we investigate what factors are related to analyst following of firms and how these factors are related to the characteristics of analysts` earnings forecasts. It would be useful for investors to know the relation between the characteristics of forecasts and factors associated with analyst following. Using earnings forecasts in individual firm reports published during 2000 and 2001, we find that analysts` forecasts are more optimistic and more accurate than forecasts by the random walk model. This result does not change even after controlling timing advantage for analysts. Also, firm size, business group affiliation, return - variability, equity holdings by foreign investors, profitability, and leverage are associated with analyst following. Further, firm size, business group affiliation and leverage are significantly related to forecast accuracy.
    번역하기

    This study compares the forecast accuracy of analysts and random walk model forecasts. Previous studies find that analysts do not forecast more accurately than the random walk model when controlling the forecast timing advantage for analysts. However,...

    This study compares the forecast accuracy of analysts and random walk model forecasts. Previous studies find that analysts do not forecast more accurately than the random walk model when controlling the forecast timing advantage for analysts. However, most studies didn`t use earnings forecasts published in analysts` individual firm reports. Therefore, we re-examine the forecast ability of analysts using earnings forecasts in individual firm reports. Also, we investigate what factors are related to analyst following of firms and how these factors are related to the characteristics of analysts` earnings forecasts. It would be useful for investors to know the relation between the characteristics of forecasts and factors associated with analyst following. Using earnings forecasts in individual firm reports published during 2000 and 2001, we find that analysts` forecasts are more optimistic and more accurate than forecasts by the random walk model. This result does not change even after controlling timing advantage for analysts. Also, firm size, business group affiliation, return - variability, equity holdings by foreign investors, profitability, and leverage are associated with analyst following. Further, firm size, business group affiliation and leverage are significantly related to forecast accuracy.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼