RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국에서의 교육과정 연구의 재개념화 경향과 전망 및 과제 = The Trends, Perspectives and Problems on the Reconceptualization of Curriculum Studies in korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76388019

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The primary purpose of this study is to examine the trends of the reconceptualization of curriculum studies in Korea. There are two main trends: One is 'about' and the other is 'for the study of reconceptualization of curriculum studies.
    The former trend mainly introduces the thematic heart of the reconceptualization. That is, it explores the reconceptualists' understanding of the curriculum and discusses their viewpoints. Reconceptualists ’ viewpoints can be summarized as five major points: the historic, the aesthetic-philosophic, the social-political the psycho-analytical, and the phenomenological.
    The second trend is focused on the reconceptualization of the concept of the curriculum itself and the clarification of the reconceptualists ’ ground theory, which are, phenomenology, hermeneutics, aesthetics, and ethnography. These approaches are related to the pursuit of curriculum theorizing and the establishment of identity of the curriculum. From the second trend's viewpoint, it seems that the Korean curriculum
    field has begun to reconceptualize cautiously. These efforts can initiate a shift of paradigm of curriculum study from development to understanding
    It is clear, however, that the effort reconceptualize in curriculum study at present is still inert. The researchers and results of reconceptual inquiry are not abundant and the focus of reconceptualization is not directed towards the concept of curriculum itself. Thus, it is proposed that future curriculum studies should work hard on refining the existing reconceptual studies and establishing identity of the new curriculum1 concept, rather than introducing the study about reconceptualization and the nature of its ground theory.
    번역하기

    The primary purpose of this study is to examine the trends of the reconceptualization of curriculum studies in Korea. There are two main trends: One is 'about' and the other is 'for the study of reconceptualization of curriculum studies. The...

    The primary purpose of this study is to examine the trends of the reconceptualization of curriculum studies in Korea. There are two main trends: One is 'about' and the other is 'for the study of reconceptualization of curriculum studies.
    The former trend mainly introduces the thematic heart of the reconceptualization. That is, it explores the reconceptualists' understanding of the curriculum and discusses their viewpoints. Reconceptualists ’ viewpoints can be summarized as five major points: the historic, the aesthetic-philosophic, the social-political the psycho-analytical, and the phenomenological.
    The second trend is focused on the reconceptualization of the concept of the curriculum itself and the clarification of the reconceptualists ’ ground theory, which are, phenomenology, hermeneutics, aesthetics, and ethnography. These approaches are related to the pursuit of curriculum theorizing and the establishment of identity of the curriculum. From the second trend's viewpoint, it seems that the Korean curriculum
    field has begun to reconceptualize cautiously. These efforts can initiate a shift of paradigm of curriculum study from development to understanding
    It is clear, however, that the effort reconceptualize in curriculum study at present is still inert. The researchers and results of reconceptual inquiry are not abundant and the focus of reconceptualization is not directed towards the concept of curriculum itself. Thus, it is proposed that future curriculum studies should work hard on refining the existing reconceptual studies and establishing identity of the new curriculum1 concept, rather than introducing the study about reconceptualization and the nature of its ground theory.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.교육과정 연구의 재개념화 경향 분석을 위한 사전 논의
    • Ⅲ.한국에서의 교육과정 연구의 재개념화 연구 경향
    • Ⅳ.결론: 전망 및 과제
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.교육과정 연구의 재개념화 경향 분석을 위한 사전 논의
    • Ⅲ.한국에서의 교육과정 연구의 재개념화 연구 경향
    • Ⅳ.결론: 전망 및 과제
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼