오래된 거울, 도깨비의 타자성 = An Ancient mirror; the otherness of Tokkaebi

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Koreans, on the one hand, transfer their scopes of consciousness into those of unconsciousness through Tokkaebi, and the reverse process is also true. To put it another way, Tokkaebi plays a critical role as a medium of communication between the consciousness and the unconsciousness among Koreans. Koreans tend to reflect their reluctant shadow of mind through the being called Tokkaebi. As a matter of fact, however, it is true Tokkaebi is an alien substance, as familiar it is. It is the very its characteristic of ambivalence and marginal-being that induces us to call Tokkaebi a familiar trap, or a well-known monster . Tokkaebi is far from being a god, and it falls into the category of neither human being nor natural being. That s why Tokkaebi wanders around us with being affiliated to nowhere. Most strangers, gods and monsters can be proofs that reveal the presence of crevices in the human abyss. We human beings have equalized the goodness with self-identity and the concept of sameness, as well as vice with alien-beings. Alien beings and monsters exist not only in the legends or fantasy but also in the unconscious core of our culture as a mirror that hint how our culture is structured. In this vein, ghosts, which hold so-called traumas, can be classified into the category of The other . Of course, needless to say, Tokkaebi is sure to be called The other . By pursuing its behaviors and conceptuality, this thesis is aimed at investigating the otherness of Tokkaebi among Tokkaebi-Tales. In conclusion, Tokkaebi has the characteristic of double identity , double otherness and the double self and the otherness. Tokkaebi, which can be defined as double identity , is not a monster differentiated from human-self. This tales display the relationship between self and an identified stranger or between self and an internalized stranger. The concept of double otherness of Tokkaebi imitate the concept of metamorphosis enabling the otherness of females from males. Tokkaebi, playing a role of the double self and the otherness, puts emphasis on us how we should treat other ourselves in us and how dangerous myself in me can be.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 도깨비는 타자인가 2. 두 명의 주체 3. 두 명의 타자 4. 이중-주체와 타자 5. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최기숙, "환상" 연세대 출판부 2003

2 임석재, "한국의 도깨비" 열화당 1 : 1981

3 강은해, "한국난타의 원형,두두리 도깨비의 세계" 예림기획 2003

4 강은해, "한국 도깨비담의 형성 변화와 구조에 관한 연구" 서강대 1985

5 이성희, "타자의 미분성" 경희대민속학연구소,보고사 11 : 2006

6 문기호, "타자성의 미학적 의의에 관한 연구" 서울대 2000

7 리처드 커니, "이방인,신,괴물" 개마고원 2004

8 쯔베탕 토도로프, "바흐친:문학사회학과 대화 이론" 까치 1987

9 김종대, "민담과 신앙을 통해 본 도깨비의 세계" 국학자료원 1997

10 최인학, "도깨비의 민속학적 고찰" 인하대 출판부 1989

11 김열규, "도깨비와 귀신:한국의 남과 여" 계명대 한국학연구원 30 : 2003

12 송효섭, "도깨비는 어떻게 생겨나는가" 계명대 한국학연구원 30 : 2003

13 임동권, "도깨비고" 선명문화사 1971

14 김열규, "도깨비 날개를 달다" 춘추사 1991

15 이부영, "도깨비" 고려대민족문화연구소 3 : 1981

16 황인덕, "‘형제투금형’ 설화의 한국민담적 변모" 고대민족문화연구소 (21) : 1988

17 최기숙, "‘여성 원귀’의 환상적 서사화 방식을 통해 본 하위 주체의 타자화 과정과 문화적 위치-고전 소설에 나타난 ‘자살’과 ‘원귀’ 서사의 통계 분석을 바탕으로-" 한국고소설학회 22 (22): 325-355, 2006

18 이부영, "‘도깨비’의 심리학적 측면과 상징성" 계명대 한국학연구원 30 : 2003