낙후산업지역(Brownfield) 개발 관련 입법 동향 분석 및 대안의 모색 = How to Pursue Development of Brownfields

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Instead of broadening the scope of innocent landowner defenses to SECA(the Soil Environment Conservation Act) liabilities as SARA(the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act) and Brownfields Act(the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfield Revitalization Act) of US do, the current owners should not be immunized from liabilities to attain the swift cleanup of the contaminated sites. There are several reasons to justify why the third defences are not broadened by imposing strict liabilities on the owners: 1) if the purchasing prices properly reflects the fact of whether purchased sites are contaminated or not by the commercial custom`s inquiries, the polluter pays principles are ultimately satisfied, 2) it is possible to prevent the occurrence of orphan land and past owners` moral hazard problems, 3) by not imposing burden on the public, equity between the public who have no responsibilities and the parties who are potentially responsible for cleanup are not violated, and 4) since the environmental problems are required to be considered or dealt with before buying the property, it is a good opportunity to strengthen the Constitution that the public should also be in duty bounded to improve the environment, but simply not getting a free ride on the environment.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조홍식, "토양환경침해에 관한 법적 책임" 20 : 1998

2 김현준, "토양정화책임-토양환경보전법 제10조의 3에 대한 비판적 검토-" 34 (34): 2005

3 송동수, "토양오염과 공법상 정화책임-토양환경보전법의 개정을 중심으로-" 14 : 2001

4 한귀현, "일본의 새로운 토양오염대책법" 17 : 2003

5 박윤흔, "미국환경법상의 토양오염정화의 법적책임" (7) : 1996

6 이창환, "미국에 있어서의 토양오염에 관한 법적책임" (3) : 2001

7 United States v. Shell Oil Co., "United States v. Shell Oil Co.,13 F. Supp. 2d 1018, 1023 (C.D. Cal. 1998)"

8 United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co., Inc., "United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 1: CV_93_1482, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22573 (M.D. PA. Apr.29 1996)"

9 United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp., "United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp., 572 F. Supp.(S.D. Ohio 1983)"

10 Thornhill, J.A., "The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, Changes the Rules for Property Acquisitions"

11 Vandenberg, H. D., "The Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001: New Hope for Urban Development, 23 Amercian Bar Association Construction Law 39"

12 Scott Reisch, "The Brownfields Amendments: New Opportunities, New Challenges - Part I" Colorado Law 31 (31): 2002

13 Wiegard, P. M., "The Brownfields Act: Providing Relief for the Innocent or New Hurdels to Avoid CERCLA Liability?"

14 "Memorandum, Policy Toward Owners of Property, Containing Contaminated Aquifers"

15 Watson, B. A., "Liberal Construction of CERCLA under the Remedial Purpose Canon: Have the Lower Courts Taken a Good Thing Too Far? 20 Harvard Law Review 199"

16 Juergensmeyer, J. C., "Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law 4"

17 "Environmental Protection Agency, Cleanup Enforcement: Alternative Dispute Resolution" Environmental Protection Agency

18 Steinway, D. M., "Congress Clarifies Innocent Landowner Defense to Super-fund Liability, American Law Corporation, Couns. Mag"

19 Chase, A.R., "CERCLA: Convey to a Pauper and Avoid Cost Recovery under Section 107(A)(1), 33 Environmental Law 393"

20 Levine, A. S., "Brownfields Revitalization and Environmental Restoration Act of 2001: The Benefits and the Limitations" 13 (13): 2002

21 Harmon, T., & Williams, K., "Brownfields Revitalization Act: Big Promises Not Delivered in New Brownfields Law, Environs (Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP, Seattle, WA)"

22 Kearns, T., "An Examination of, Suggested Revisions To, CERRCLA's Provisions Waiving the Federal Government's Sovereign Immunity From Actions Based on State Law" 5 (5): 1997

23 O' Neil v. Picillo, "682 F. Supp. 706, 720-24"