RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    폐기물과 순환자원의 법적 개념의 변화와 적용 = Change and Adaption of Legal Concepts about Waste and Circular Resources

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76379540

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The international society has come to change the paradigm of solid wastes management. Solid wastes was deemed to discarded materials for a long time everywhere in the world. Nowadays, many advanced countries of OECD like Germany, Japan, United Kingdom and U.S.A. has taken steps to adapt their waste management system into recycling-friendly society. Korea has also taken steps so far to change the waste management paradigm. Korean government introduced so-called the producer liability into the Save of Resources and Acceleration of Recycling Act of 1992 and the Revision Act thereof 2002. The Save of Resources and Acceleration of Recycling Act of 2008 adopted the concept of sustainable circulation of resources and the principles to execute this concept. But it is yet unsatisfactory that the concept of discarded material which consist of the concept of abandoned or disposed of reign over the concept of circular resources, that is, material capable of reuse or recycling in the environmental legal system. The recycling concept, for example, is yet explained by way of the waste concept as following: the circular resources in the statute has the meaning of the useful things among wastes etc. For the purpose of new paradigm toward sustainable society, the concept of waste and circular resources should be defined again and separately. The definition of circular resources in the statutes concerned should be changed into like this: the circular resources means materials or energy having economic values to re-product, re-distribute or re-consume among garbages, by-products or discharged materials accompanying to economic activities like production, distribution or consumption of goods or services. As a result of this definition about circular resources, the definition of waste in the statutes concerned should also be changed into like this: the waste means discarded material or energy without economic values among garbages, by-products or discharged materials accompanying to economic activities, or material or energy very difficult to recycle or reuse, even if it has some economic values. There are several sections of statutes concerned which should be revised afterwards to harmonize each other according to such change of definition.
    번역하기

    The international society has come to change the paradigm of solid wastes management. Solid wastes was deemed to discarded materials for a long time everywhere in the world. Nowadays, many advanced countries of OECD like Germany, Japan, United Kingdom...

    The international society has come to change the paradigm of solid wastes management. Solid wastes was deemed to discarded materials for a long time everywhere in the world. Nowadays, many advanced countries of OECD like Germany, Japan, United Kingdom and U.S.A. has taken steps to adapt their waste management system into recycling-friendly society. Korea has also taken steps so far to change the waste management paradigm. Korean government introduced so-called the producer liability into the Save of Resources and Acceleration of Recycling Act of 1992 and the Revision Act thereof 2002. The Save of Resources and Acceleration of Recycling Act of 2008 adopted the concept of sustainable circulation of resources and the principles to execute this concept. But it is yet unsatisfactory that the concept of discarded material which consist of the concept of abandoned or disposed of reign over the concept of circular resources, that is, material capable of reuse or recycling in the environmental legal system. The recycling concept, for example, is yet explained by way of the waste concept as following: the circular resources in the statute has the meaning of the useful things among wastes etc. For the purpose of new paradigm toward sustainable society, the concept of waste and circular resources should be defined again and separately. The definition of circular resources in the statutes concerned should be changed into like this: the circular resources means materials or energy having economic values to re-product, re-distribute or re-consume among garbages, by-products or discharged materials accompanying to economic activities like production, distribution or consumption of goods or services. As a result of this definition about circular resources, the definition of waste in the statutes concerned should also be changed into like this: the waste means discarded material or energy without economic values among garbages, by-products or discharged materials accompanying to economic activities, or material or energy very difficult to recycle or reuse, even if it has some economic values. There are several sections of statutes concerned which should be revised afterwards to harmonize each other according to such change of definition.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전재경, "현행법제개선방안연구(Ⅳ): 쓰레기 관리법제"

    2 전재경, "해양투기 폐기물의 매체간 통합관리 및 절차적정화 연구"

    3 "폐기물관리법 판례집"

    4 이남웅, "폐기물관리 규제 개선방안 연구"

    5 "폐기물 해양 배출제도"

    6 김연태, "폐기물 개념 및 분류ㆍ처리체계-독일의 순환관리 및 폐기물법을 중심으로-" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 2003

    7 "청정생산 기술개발 보급사업 중장기계획"

    8 박해경, "제재조 및 지속가능제품개발 국제심포지움"

    9 오용선, "제1차 국가폐기물관리 종합계획에 대한 평가와 대안"

    10 신방섭, "자원 리싸이클링" 전남대학교 출판부 1993

    1 전재경, "현행법제개선방안연구(Ⅳ): 쓰레기 관리법제"

    2 전재경, "해양투기 폐기물의 매체간 통합관리 및 절차적정화 연구"

    3 "폐기물관리법 판례집"

    4 이남웅, "폐기물관리 규제 개선방안 연구"

    5 "폐기물 해양 배출제도"

    6 김연태, "폐기물 개념 및 분류ㆍ처리체계-독일의 순환관리 및 폐기물법을 중심으로-" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 2003

    7 "청정생산 기술개발 보급사업 중장기계획"

    8 박해경, "제재조 및 지속가능제품개발 국제심포지움"

    9 오용선, "제1차 국가폐기물관리 종합계획에 대한 평가와 대안"

    10 신방섭, "자원 리싸이클링" 전남대학교 출판부 1993

    11 "Waste Strategy 2000 : England and Wales"

    12 J. B. Ruhl?John Copeland, "The Practice and Policy of Environmental Law"

    13 "ISO環境法 [改訂第5版]"

    14 "Explanatory Notes, Waste and Emissions Trading Act of 2003, the U.K"

    15 Jane Holder?Maria Lee, "Environmental Protection"

    16 Kathryn L. Schroeder, "Environmental Law"

    17 Steven Ferrey, "Environmental Law"

    18 홍준형, "?환경법?" 박영사 2008

    19 박균성, "?환경법?" 박영사 2008

    20 "?자원순환경제 사회와 지속가능한 지구?"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼