과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발 = The Development of Rubrics to Assess Scientific Argumentation

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이범홍, "토의 토론 학습과 중등학교 과학교육. 1997년도 교과교육공동연구 결과보고서" 한국 학술 진흥 재단 1998

2 Herman, J. I., "수행평가 과제 제작의 원리와 실재" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2000

3 남정희, "논의과정을 강조한 교수？학습 전략이 중학생들의 인지발달, 과학개념 이해, 과학관련 태도 및 논의과정에 미치는 영향" 한국과학교육학회 26 (26): 450-461, 2006

4 Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "“Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in high school genetics" John Wiley & Sons 2000

5 Mitchell, S., "What is this thing called argument? in Essays in argument" Middlesex University Press 2001

6 Goodrich, H., "Understanding rubrics" 54 (54): 14-17, 1996

7 Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" Cambridge University Press 1958

8 Chinn, C. A., "The structure of discussions that promote reasoning" 100 (100): 315-368, 2000

9 Sandoval, W. A., "The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations" 23 (23): 23-55, 2005

10 Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science" 21 : 553-576, 1999

11 Lawson, A. E., "The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching" 25 (25): 1387-1408, 2003

12 Messick, S., "The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments" 23 (23): 13-23, 1994

13 Felton, M., "The development of argumentative discourse skill" 32 (32): 135-153, 2001

14 Perella, J., "The debate method of critical thinking: An introduction to argumentation" Kendall/Hun 1987

15 Schwarz, B., "The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues in Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments" Kluwer 227-260, 2003

16 Erduran, S., "TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse" 88 (88): 915-933, 2004

17 McNeill, K. L., "Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials" 15 (15): 153-191, 2006

18 Carr, J.F., "Succeeding with standards: Linking curriculum, assessment, and action planning. Alexandria" Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development 2001

19 McCann, T. M., "Student argumentative writing: Knowledge and ability at three grade levels" 23 (23): 62-76, 1989

20 Bazerman, C., "Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science" University of Wisconsin Press 1988

21 Arter, J., "Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance" Corwin Press 2001

22 Moskal, B. M., "Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment" 7 (7): 2000

23 Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning for the Web with KIE" 22 (22): 797-817, 2000

24 Kuhn, D., "Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking" 77 (77): 319-337, 1993

25 Zembal-Saul, C., "Scaffolding preservice teachers' evidencebased arguments during an investigation of natural selection" 32 : 437-463, 2003

26 Arter, J., "Rubrics, scoring guides, and performance criteria: Classroom tools for assessing and improving student learning" ERIC Document Reproduction Service Mo. ED446100 2000

27 Clark, D., "Personally -seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation" 29 (29): 253-277, 2006

28 Chan, C. K. K., "Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information" 29 : 443-479, 2001

29 McNeill, K. L., "Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanation" Lawrence Erlbaum Associate 2007

30 Maloney, J., "Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation" 28 (28): 1817-1841, 2006

31 Simon, S., "Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the Science Classroom" 28 (28): 235-260, 2006

32 Davis, L., "Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts" 5 (5): 194-197, 1992

33 Andrews, R., "Improving the quality of argument 5-16: Final Report" Esmee Fairbairn Charitable Trust/University of Hull 1993

34 Kelly, G. J., "How students argue scientific claims: a rhetoricalsemantic analysis" 24 (24): 28-55, 2003

35 Felton, M. K., "From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding adolescents' perspective writing" 47 (47): 672-683, 2004

36 Zohar, A., "Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics" 39 : 35-62, 2002

37 Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms" 84 (84): 287-312, 2000

38 Kelly, G. J., "Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students use of evidence in writing" 86 : 314-342, 2002

39 Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science" 41 (41): 994-1020, 2004

40 Osborne, J. F., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science" 82 (82): 63-70, 2001

41 Schafer, W. D., "Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content area" 14 : 151-170, 2001

42 Hogan, K., "Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacherguided discussion" 17 (17): 379-432, 2000

43 Zimmaro, D. M., "Developing grading rubrics"

44 Kanselaar, G., "Designing argumentation tools fro collaborative learning in Visualising argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-making" Springer 51-73, 2002

45 Pollock, J. L., "Defeasible reasoning" 11 : 481-518, 1987

46 Yore, L. D., "Current realities and future possibilities: language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction" 28 (28): 291-314, 2006

47 Bricker, L. A., "Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education" 92 (92): 473-498, 2008

48 Hogan, K., "Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students and scientists' reasoning about conclusions" 38 (38): 663-687, 2001

49 Nussbaum, E. M., "Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review" 33 : 345-359, 2008

50 Veerman. A., "Collaborative argumentation in academic education" 30 : 155-186, 2002

51 O'Donnell, A. M., "Cognitive perspectives on peer learning" Erlbaum 1998

52 Mercer, N., "Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom" 25 (25): 95-111, 1999

53 Siegel, M. A., "Chapter 7. Using rubrics to foster meaningful learning in Assessment in Science" NSTA press 89-106, 2006

54 Reiser, B. J., "BGUILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms in Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress" Erlbaum 263-305, 2001

55 Sampson, V., "Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions" 92 (92): 447-472, 2008

56 Banta, T. W., "Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses" Jossey-Bass 1996

57 Astin, A. W., "Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education" Macmillan 1993

58 Marttunen, M., "Assessing argumentation skills among finish university students" 4 : 175-191, 1994

59 Naylor, S., "Argumentation and primary science" 37 : 17-39, 2007

60 Van Gelder, T., "Argument mapping with reasonable" 2 (2): 85-90, 2002

61 Aufscjnaiter, C. V., "Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge" 45 (45): 101-131, 2008

62 Takao, A. Y., "Applying argumentation analysis to assess the quality of university oceanography students' scientific writing" 5 (5): 40-48, 2002

63 Waltman, K., "Alternative approaches to scoring: The effect of using different scoring methods on the validity of scores from a performance assessment" National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing 1998

64 Sadler, T. D., "A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation" 90 : 986-1004, 2006