RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    비판이론의 관점에서 본 다문화 교육의 한계 = The Limits of Multi-cultural Education from a Viewpoint of Critical Theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76372177

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Globalization and multi-cultural society as its consequence are general phenomena, and in a logical way, they have also become a latest research theme of pedagogic field. The conceptual metaphor which contains in the usual discourse over the multi-culturality and its educational approaches is on the whole positive, and warm-hearted. For this reason most of pedagogic inquiries into multiculturality can be caught in an ideological trap. This article investigates its reality and possibility in the educational approaches from an ideological-critical and meta-theoretical viewpoints. Of course, the multi-culturality and its social results deserve to be dealt with seriously in the educational research field. But we must also reveal fatal limits many inquiries in the field have hold explicitly and implicitly so far. Firstly, the globalization and multi-cultural society have not only been developed according to the logic of capital in the `global` dimension, but brought about cultural and social results. Here most of pedagogic researches have failed to notice its `structural moment`, and have been absorbed only in `cultural moment`. This may be a necessary consequence of pedagogic closedness which derived from the typical tradition of modern pedagogy; the dual assumption between the `educational individual` and `pedagogically modellized space`. The second is related to the question how we can educate students in the through globalization radically extended realities by means of a certain educational program. This problem comes into contact with an aporia, universality and peculiarity of human subject formation. Finally, universality as an ethical and axiological foundation in the educational discourse over multi-culturality may be placed in the ideological context, that is, a European universality. Here this paper proposes an ideological and post-modernistic perspectives in the multi-cultural educational approaches.
    번역하기

    The Globalization and multi-cultural society as its consequence are general phenomena, and in a logical way, they have also become a latest research theme of pedagogic field. The conceptual metaphor which contains in the usual discourse over the multi...

    The Globalization and multi-cultural society as its consequence are general phenomena, and in a logical way, they have also become a latest research theme of pedagogic field. The conceptual metaphor which contains in the usual discourse over the multi-culturality and its educational approaches is on the whole positive, and warm-hearted. For this reason most of pedagogic inquiries into multiculturality can be caught in an ideological trap. This article investigates its reality and possibility in the educational approaches from an ideological-critical and meta-theoretical viewpoints. Of course, the multi-culturality and its social results deserve to be dealt with seriously in the educational research field. But we must also reveal fatal limits many inquiries in the field have hold explicitly and implicitly so far. Firstly, the globalization and multi-cultural society have not only been developed according to the logic of capital in the `global` dimension, but brought about cultural and social results. Here most of pedagogic researches have failed to notice its `structural moment`, and have been absorbed only in `cultural moment`. This may be a necessary consequence of pedagogic closedness which derived from the typical tradition of modern pedagogy; the dual assumption between the `educational individual` and `pedagogically modellized space`. The second is related to the question how we can educate students in the through globalization radically extended realities by means of a certain educational program. This problem comes into contact with an aporia, universality and peculiarity of human subject formation. Finally, universality as an ethical and axiological foundation in the educational discourse over multi-culturality may be placed in the ideological context, that is, a European universality. Here this paper proposes an ideological and post-modernistic perspectives in the multi-cultural educational approaches.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한겨레신문,

    2 조상식, "훔볼트의 ‘Bildung’ 개념에 대한 교육학적 이해" 한국헤겔학회 (16) : 223-258, 2004

    3 Wallerstein,I., "유럽적 보편주의. 권력의 레토릭" 창비 2008

    4 정영근, "세계화시대 상호문화교육의 목표와 과제" 6 (6): 143-160, 2001

    5 정영근, "상호문화교육의 일반교육학적 고찰" 37 : 29-42, 2006

    6 정영근, "사이'의 세기와 상호문화 교육" 한독교육학회 12 (12): 257-272, 2007

    7 조상식, "보편논쟁과 교육학-계몽주의와 신인문주의의 논쟁에 나타난 인간 주체형성의 문제" 8 (8): 47-63, 2003

    8 한겨레신문, "동아시아 대안지리학대회보. ‘탈지구화와 동아시아’."

    9 Heydorn,H.-J, "Über den Widerspruch von Bildung und Herrschaft"

    10 Hornstein,W, "rziehung und Bildung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung" 47 (47): 517-537, 2001

    1 한겨레신문,

    2 조상식, "훔볼트의 ‘Bildung’ 개념에 대한 교육학적 이해" 한국헤겔학회 (16) : 223-258, 2004

    3 Wallerstein,I., "유럽적 보편주의. 권력의 레토릭" 창비 2008

    4 정영근, "세계화시대 상호문화교육의 목표와 과제" 6 (6): 143-160, 2001

    5 정영근, "상호문화교육의 일반교육학적 고찰" 37 : 29-42, 2006

    6 정영근, "사이'의 세기와 상호문화 교육" 한독교육학회 12 (12): 257-272, 2007

    7 조상식, "보편논쟁과 교육학-계몽주의와 신인문주의의 논쟁에 나타난 인간 주체형성의 문제" 8 (8): 47-63, 2003

    8 한겨레신문, "동아시아 대안지리학대회보. ‘탈지구화와 동아시아’."

    9 Heydorn,H.-J, "Über den Widerspruch von Bildung und Herrschaft"

    10 Hornstein,W, "rziehung und Bildung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung" 47 (47): 517-537, 2001

    11 Gemende,M, "Zwischen den Kulturen. - Pädagogische und sozialpädagogische Zugänge zur Interkulturalität" Juventa Verlag 2000

    12 Beck,U, "Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus-Antworten auf Globalisierung"

    13 Pongratz,L, "Vergessene Zukunft? Notizen über Pädagogik und Postmoderne In : Neue Sammlung"

    14 Rang,A, "Themen der Moderne-Themen der Pädagogik?"

    15 Giddens,A, "The constitution of society" Polity Press 1984

    16 Giddens,A, "The consequences of Modernity" Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell. 1990

    17 Sennet,R, "The Corrosion of Character" W.W.Norten. 1998

    18 Vogel,P, "Stichwort:Allgemeine Pdagogik"

    19 Nestvogel,R, "Sozialisation unter Bedingungen von Globalisierung. In Globalizierung als Herausforderung für die Pädagogik" 169-194, 2000

    20 Schleiermacher,F, "Pädagogische Schriften I." Ullstein Taschenbuch 1983

    21 Euler,P, "Pädagogik und Universalienstreit" Weinheim 1989

    22 Heyting,F, "Pädagogik und Pluralismus"

    23 Aronowitz,S., "Postmodern Education.Politics,Culture and Social Criticism" Uni.of Minnesota Press 1991

    24 Zymek,B, "Leitbild ist nicht mehr der Erwerbstätige, sondern der tätige Mensch" 44 : 791-803, 1998

    25 Münch,R, "Globale Dynamik,lokale Lebenswelten.Der schwierige Weg in die Weltgesellschaft" 1998

    26 Oelkers,J, "Erziehungsstaat und pädagogischer Raum" 39 : 631-648, 1993

    27 Auernheimer,G, "Einführung in die interkulturelle Erziehung" Belz Verlag 1995

    28 Giddens,A, "Die Moderne als weltweites Experiment. Folgen der Globalisierung in der posttraditionellen Gesellschaft"

    29 Martin,H.P, "Die Globalisierungsfalle.Der Angriff auf Demokratie und Wohlstand"

    30 Koch,C, "Die Gier des Marktes.Die Ohnmacht des Staates im Kampf der Weltwirtschaft"

    31 Oelkers,J, "Democratie und Bildung" 46 : 333-347, 2000

    32 McLaren,P, "Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture-Oppositional Politics in a Postmodern Era" Routledge 1995

    33 Hoffmann, "Begründungsformen der Pädagogik in der Moderne" 1994

    34 Hornstein,W, "Aufwachsen mit Widersprüchen-Jugendsituation und Schule heute" 1990

    35 Benner,D, "Allgemeine Pädagogik. Eine systematisch-problematische Einführung in die Grundstruktur pädagogischen Denkens und Handelns" Weinheim 1987

    36 조상식, ""똘레랑스"혹은 관용,그 미덕과 해악" (11) : 53-63, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 교육철학 -> 교육철학연구 KCI등재
    2011-03-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 교육철학회 -> 한국교육철학학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Philosophy of Education Society
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Philosophy of Education Society -> The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.86
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.88 1.27 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼