RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려전기 금석문 소재 불교의례와 그 특징 = Buddhist rituals mirrored in the epigraph materials of the early half period of Goyreo, and their characteristics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76366190

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Epigraph materials are important historical records, as they contain references to facts that happened in the same period the very materials were created. And among them, epitaphs made for Buddhist priests or memorial inscriptions found inside tombs are materials created for specific individuals. So by utilizing these materials, one could overcome the disadvantage that could come by using only written documents(historical texts in the form of books), which could merely be reflecting certain Neo-Confucian views or state-centered perceptions of the time they were written. And it goes without saying that studies of Buddhist rituals can also benefit from using epigraph materials.
      Epigraph materials which documented the lifetime of deeds of a Buddhist priest let us know all kinds of Buddhist rituals that were personally observed by such particular individual priest. Also they contain records of time periods which we cannot fully enough examine through conventional historial records, such as the time period from King Taejo to King Mokjong. So their importance in this regard is significant. New Buddhist rituals (at least to today's scholars) that were never heard of before, could be found and examined through these materials. And these records would usually reveal not only the ritual itself (as they are when they are recorded in written texts) but also what actually happened before and after the ritual, allowing us to see what was the general nature of the entire situation.
      determining what would have been chosen to be documented within this kind of record in the first place. Epigraph materials usually select and record particularly notable things out of a person's life. Normal, routine things are left out. And then there is the issue of determining who would have deserved such an epigraph record. Buddhist priests whose lives are documented with these epigraph materials were usually the ones who served as National or Royal priests. As a result, the Buddhist rituals that were observed by Buddhist schools, from which either National or Royal priests were never summoned, would never be recorded through this type of records.
      Yet with all these potential weakness as a historical record, the epigraph materials could not only complement existing historical documents, but also fill in the gaps that could never be filled with conventional written texts. So one could say that they should be fully utilized in the studies of Buddhist rituals.
      번역하기

      Epigraph materials are important historical records, as they contain references to facts that happened in the same period the very materials were created. And among them, epitaphs made for Buddhist priests or memorial inscriptions found inside tombs a...

      Epigraph materials are important historical records, as they contain references to facts that happened in the same period the very materials were created. And among them, epitaphs made for Buddhist priests or memorial inscriptions found inside tombs are materials created for specific individuals. So by utilizing these materials, one could overcome the disadvantage that could come by using only written documents(historical texts in the form of books), which could merely be reflecting certain Neo-Confucian views or state-centered perceptions of the time they were written. And it goes without saying that studies of Buddhist rituals can also benefit from using epigraph materials.
      Epigraph materials which documented the lifetime of deeds of a Buddhist priest let us know all kinds of Buddhist rituals that were personally observed by such particular individual priest. Also they contain records of time periods which we cannot fully enough examine through conventional historial records, such as the time period from King Taejo to King Mokjong. So their importance in this regard is significant. New Buddhist rituals (at least to today's scholars) that were never heard of before, could be found and examined through these materials. And these records would usually reveal not only the ritual itself (as they are when they are recorded in written texts) but also what actually happened before and after the ritual, allowing us to see what was the general nature of the entire situation.
      determining what would have been chosen to be documented within this kind of record in the first place. Epigraph materials usually select and record particularly notable things out of a person's life. Normal, routine things are left out. And then there is the issue of determining who would have deserved such an epigraph record. Buddhist priests whose lives are documented with these epigraph materials were usually the ones who served as National or Royal priests. As a result, the Buddhist rituals that were observed by Buddhist schools, from which either National or Royal priests were never summoned, would never be recorded through this type of records.
      Yet with all these potential weakness as a historical record, the epigraph materials could not only complement existing historical documents, but also fill in the gaps that could never be filled with conventional written texts. So one could say that they should be fully utilized in the studies of Buddhist rituals.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 국가적 불교의례
      • 2. 개인 및 사찰의 불교의례
      • 3. 금석문을 통해 본 불교의례의 특징
      • 맺음말
      • 머리말
      • 1. 국가적 불교의례
      • 2. 개인 및 사찰의 불교의례
      • 3. 금석문을 통해 본 불교의례의 특징
      • 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 남동신, "羅末麗初 華嚴宗團의 대응과 ≪(華嚴)神衆經≫의 성립" 5 : 1993

      2 김종명, "한국 중세의 불교의례" 문학과 지성사 2001

      3 김용선, "역주 고려묘지명집성 상" 한림대 출판부 2006

      4 안계현, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 6" 국사편찬위원회 1975

      5 홍윤식, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 16" 국사편찬위원회 1994

      6 김두진, "불교사상의 전개 in: 한국사" 국사편찬위원회 1994

      7 안지원, "고려의 국가 불교의례와 문화" 서울대출판부 2005

      8 김영미, "고려시대 불교와 전염병 치유문화" 이화사학연구소 (34) : 123-160, 2007

      9 김영태, "高麗歷代王의 信佛과 國難打開의 佛事" 14 : 74-81, 1977

      10 서윤길, "高麗의 護國法會와 道場" 14 : 1977

      1 남동신, "羅末麗初 華嚴宗團의 대응과 ≪(華嚴)神衆經≫의 성립" 5 : 1993

      2 김종명, "한국 중세의 불교의례" 문학과 지성사 2001

      3 김용선, "역주 고려묘지명집성 상" 한림대 출판부 2006

      4 안계현, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 6" 국사편찬위원회 1975

      5 홍윤식, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 16" 국사편찬위원회 1994

      6 김두진, "불교사상의 전개 in: 한국사" 국사편찬위원회 1994

      7 안지원, "고려의 국가 불교의례와 문화" 서울대출판부 2005

      8 김영미, "고려시대 불교와 전염병 치유문화" 이화사학연구소 (34) : 123-160, 2007

      9 김영태, "高麗歷代王의 信佛과 國難打開의 佛事" 14 : 74-81, 1977

      10 서윤길, "高麗의 護國法會와 道場" 14 : 1977

      11 김상현, "高麗時代의 護國佛敎 연구" 단국대 대학원 1 : 1976

      12 박윤진, "高麗時代 王師․國師 硏究" 경인문화사 2006

      13 김형우, "高麗時代 國家的 佛敎行事에 대한 硏究" 동국대 1992

      14 한기문, "高麗寺院의 構造와 機能" 민족사 171-, 1998

      15 서윤길, "高麗密敎思想史硏究" 불광출판사 1993

      16 "高麗史節要"

      17 "高麗史"

      18 허흥식, "高麗佛敎史硏究" 일조각 1997

      19 김혜완, "高麗 前期의 彌勒信仰 in: 阜村 申延澈교수 정년기념논총" 1995

      20 허흥식, "韓國金石全文 上" 아세아문화사 1984

      21 "韓國佛敎全書 권 4"

      22 "漢和大辭典 권11"

      23 이지관, "校勘譯註 歷代高僧碑文 고려편 3" 가산불교문화연구원 1996

      24 이지관, "校勘譯註 歷代高僧碑文 고려편 2" 가산불교문화연구원 1995

      25 "東文選"

      26 "大正藏"

      27 "三國遺事"

      28 홍윤식, "≪高麗史≫ 世家篇 佛敎記事의 歷史的 意味" 60 : 1988

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼