RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    E-Commerce에서 통신판매중개자의 법적 지위와 책임 = On the legal position and responsibility of the Mediator of Mail Order Sales in E-Commerce

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The legal position of the mediator of mail order sales is a civil broker and commercial broker. Therefore, He is responsible for the commercial law about the brokerage business. And then is responsible for the civil law about mandate. He bears responsible for the Consumer’s Protection Law in E-commerce(CPE), too.
    Such responsibility receive the immunity but from the reponsibility by the CPE article 20. Namely, The Mediator of mail order sale is exempted all responsibility from the reponsibility by the notice of exemption from responsibility or the contract of exemption from responsibility. 중개자
    The exemption from responsibility regulation of the Mediator of mail order sale leaves a consumer protection and does the activity to protect the man of enterprise. The consumer first give the money in a Cyber transaction differ from traditional transaction by meet and business each other.
    It is use such structure and deceive, the damage by the haeking of payment means, the damage from the exposure of the individual information which is collected in the transaction course. Really the damage happens much by the man of enterprise uses small charge, anonymity, a indistinctness place engage easily the business.
    We must prepare rather strong consumer guard in a contact transaction consequently. But, CPE article 20 have the contradiction to operate as a man of enterprise guard, unlike original to be a consumer protection legislation purpose. The provision of the notice of exemption from responsibility or the contract of exemption from responsibility which the man of enterprise puts by CPE article 20 becomes the ineffectiveness by the Law on the regulation of general conditions(RGC) article 7 and CPE article 4.
    A man of enterprise exemption from responsibility regulation of a CPE article 20 revised consequently.
    번역하기

    The legal position of the mediator of mail order sales is a civil broker and commercial broker. Therefore, He is responsible for the commercial law about the brokerage business. And then is responsible for the civil law about mandate. He bears respons...

    The legal position of the mediator of mail order sales is a civil broker and commercial broker. Therefore, He is responsible for the commercial law about the brokerage business. And then is responsible for the civil law about mandate. He bears responsible for the Consumer’s Protection Law in E-commerce(CPE), too.
    Such responsibility receive the immunity but from the reponsibility by the CPE article 20. Namely, The Mediator of mail order sale is exempted all responsibility from the reponsibility by the notice of exemption from responsibility or the contract of exemption from responsibility. 중개자
    The exemption from responsibility regulation of the Mediator of mail order sale leaves a consumer protection and does the activity to protect the man of enterprise. The consumer first give the money in a Cyber transaction differ from traditional transaction by meet and business each other.
    It is use such structure and deceive, the damage by the haeking of payment means, the damage from the exposure of the individual information which is collected in the transaction course. Really the damage happens much by the man of enterprise uses small charge, anonymity, a indistinctness place engage easily the business.
    We must prepare rather strong consumer guard in a contact transaction consequently. But, CPE article 20 have the contradiction to operate as a man of enterprise guard, unlike original to be a consumer protection legislation purpose. The provision of the notice of exemption from responsibility or the contract of exemption from responsibility which the man of enterprise puts by CPE article 20 becomes the ineffectiveness by the Law on the regulation of general conditions(RGC) article 7 and CPE article 4.
    A man of enterprise exemption from responsibility regulation of a CPE article 20 revised consequently.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "현대부동산학" 서울 : 법문사 2006

    2 "주석상법총칙·상행위(2)" 서울:한국사법행정학회 2003

    3 "전자상거래와 소비자보호" 서울 : 집문당 2003

    4 "전자상거래법추록" 서울 : 다산출판사 2001

    5 "전자상거래법" 서울 : 삼영사 2002

    6 "전자상거래법" 서울:법영사 24-, 2002

    7 "상법총칙·상행위전정판" 서울:박영사 1995

    8 "상법총칙·상행위법" 서울 : 법문사 1999

    9 "상법기본강의" 서울 : 형설출판사 2007

    10 "부동산학개론" 서울 : 형설출판사 2004

    1 "현대부동산학" 서울 : 법문사 2006

    2 "주석상법총칙·상행위(2)" 서울:한국사법행정학회 2003

    3 "전자상거래와 소비자보호" 서울 : 집문당 2003

    4 "전자상거래법추록" 서울 : 다산출판사 2001

    5 "전자상거래법" 서울 : 삼영사 2002

    6 "전자상거래법" 서울:법영사 24-, 2002

    7 "상법총칙·상행위전정판" 서울:박영사 1995

    8 "상법총칙·상행위법" 서울 : 법문사 1999

    9 "상법기본강의" 서울 : 형설출판사 2007

    10 "부동산학개론" 서울 : 형설출판사 2004

    11 "민법주해제15권(채권8)" 서울 : 박영사 1997

    12 "민법개정안의견서" 민법개정안연구회 2002

    13 江頭憲治郞, "商取引法(上)" 東京 : 弘文堂 2005

    14 Schlechtriem P, "SchuldrechtBT 6. Aufl." Tbingen 2002

    15 Fikentscher, W, "Schuldrecht10. Aufl." Urheberrechlich gesschtztes Material 2006

    16 Ibold, H. Ch, "Maklerrecht" Erich Schmidt 2003

    17 Zopfs J, "Das Maklerrecht in der neueren hoechstrichterlichen Rechtsprechung, Verlag Kommunikationsforum GmbHKln, 3. Aufl." 1996

    18 Dehner, W, "Das Maklerrecht" Recht unt wirtshaft 2001

    19 Edward A, "Cyberspace and the lawYour Rights and Duties in the On-line World The MIT Press" 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2014-01-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Civil Law KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.42 1.42 1.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 1.08 1.392 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼