RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중학교특수학급 교육과정 편성 및 운영 실태분석 = A Study on the Present state, Problem of Middle School Curriculum for Special Class

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101198595

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine how middle school curriculum for special class were compiled and applied in Seoul and what problems they were faced with. The major findings of the study were as follows: First, there wasn``t solid theoretical foundation for the compilation and operation of special-class curriculum, and there was neither enough collaboration between special education teachers and regular education teachers nor adequate connection between special class curriculum and regular curriculum, either. Second, as for assessment and individualized education, assessment committees and boards of individualized education existed just for form``s sake. The way to map out individualized education plans and to carry them out was not efficient. Third, concerning teaching-learning and evaluation activities for students in special class, teaching-learning materials and evaluation methods appeared not to be satisfactory. Fourth, extracurriculum activities and discretion courses were provided without having a full understanding of disabled students nor considering their opinions. Seventh, administrative and financial aids were not sufficient enough to ensure the successful operation of special class. To improvement the situation, specific guidelines about academic, discretion and extracurricular activities and therapy education, which are the basis of special-class curricula, should be prepared. Second, how to apply special-class curriculum should be determined in detail. Proper teaching methods should be selected for different areas, and in which way curricular should be modified should be decided. Besides, a wide variety of materials about discretion and extracurricular activities and therapy education should be developed. Third, in which direction evaluation should be led and relevant guidelines should be determined. What and how to evaluate should be presented, and academic achievement evaluation methods also should be supplied. In addition, alternative assessment methods applicable to students in special class should be introduced as well.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine how middle school curriculum for special class were compiled and applied in Seoul and what problems they were faced with. The major findings of the study were as follows: First, there wasn``t solid theoretical ...

    The purpose of this study was to examine how middle school curriculum for special class were compiled and applied in Seoul and what problems they were faced with. The major findings of the study were as follows: First, there wasn``t solid theoretical foundation for the compilation and operation of special-class curriculum, and there was neither enough collaboration between special education teachers and regular education teachers nor adequate connection between special class curriculum and regular curriculum, either. Second, as for assessment and individualized education, assessment committees and boards of individualized education existed just for form``s sake. The way to map out individualized education plans and to carry them out was not efficient. Third, concerning teaching-learning and evaluation activities for students in special class, teaching-learning materials and evaluation methods appeared not to be satisfactory. Fourth, extracurriculum activities and discretion courses were provided without having a full understanding of disabled students nor considering their opinions. Seventh, administrative and financial aids were not sufficient enough to ensure the successful operation of special class. To improvement the situation, specific guidelines about academic, discretion and extracurricular activities and therapy education, which are the basis of special-class curricula, should be prepared. Second, how to apply special-class curriculum should be determined in detail. Proper teaching methods should be selected for different areas, and in which way curricular should be modified should be decided. Besides, a wide variety of materials about discretion and extracurricular activities and therapy education should be developed. Third, in which direction evaluation should be led and relevant guidelines should be determined. What and how to evaluate should be presented, and academic achievement evaluation methods also should be supplied. In addition, alternative assessment methods applicable to students in special class should be introduced as well.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이유훈, "학습자 중심의 학교 교육과정 구성모형" 대구대학교 대학원 1999

    2 최세민, "특수학급경영론" 박학사 2005

    3 교육부, "특수학교 교육과정"

    4 신현기, "통합교육의 이론과 실제" 박학사 2005

    5 이유훈, "초등특수학급 교육과정 편성․운영에 관한 연구" 서울특별시교육연구원 2005

    6 김주영, "중등특수학급운영개선방안" 국립특수교육원 2001

    7 Friend, M., "The new mainstreaming" 101 (101): 30-36, 1992

    8 Gearheart, B. R., "The handicapped child in the regular classroom" Charles E. Merrill 1988

    9 Bender, W. N., "Teaching students with mild disabilities" Allyn and Bacon 1996

    10 Meese, R. L., "Teaching learners with mild disabilities:Integrating research and practice" Brooks/Cole Publishing Co 1994

    1 이유훈, "학습자 중심의 학교 교육과정 구성모형" 대구대학교 대학원 1999

    2 최세민, "특수학급경영론" 박학사 2005

    3 교육부, "특수학교 교육과정"

    4 신현기, "통합교육의 이론과 실제" 박학사 2005

    5 이유훈, "초등특수학급 교육과정 편성․운영에 관한 연구" 서울특별시교육연구원 2005

    6 김주영, "중등특수학급운영개선방안" 국립특수교육원 2001

    7 Friend, M., "The new mainstreaming" 101 (101): 30-36, 1992

    8 Gearheart, B. R., "The handicapped child in the regular classroom" Charles E. Merrill 1988

    9 Bender, W. N., "Teaching students with mild disabilities" Allyn and Bacon 1996

    10 Meese, R. L., "Teaching learners with mild disabilities:Integrating research and practice" Brooks/Cole Publishing Co 1994

    11 Berdine, W. H., "Students with mental retardation, In An introduction to special education" HarperCollins 405-454, 1993

    12 Bagley. M. T., "Peer attitudes toward the handicapped scale" Pro-Ed 1981

    13 Safran J., "Organizing communication for the LD teacher" 20 : 427-435, 1985

    14 Bauwens, J., "Making Co-teaching a mainstreaming strategy" 35 (35): 19-24, 1991

    15 Peterson, J. M., "Inclusive Teaching Creating Effective Schools for All Learners" Allyn & Bacon 2003

    16 Friend M., "Including Students With Special Needs: A Practical Guide For Classroom Teachers" Allyn & Bacon 1996

    17 Roberts, C., "Factors influencing the social status of children with mild academic disabilities in regular classrooms" 59 (59): 192-202, 1993

    18 Salend, S. J., "Factors contributing to the Development of Succesful mainstreaming Programs" 50 (50): 406-416, 1984

    19 Salend, S. J., "Effective mainstreaming : Creating inclusive classrooms" Macmillan Publishing Co 1994

    20 Cook, L., "Educational leadership for teacher collaboration, In Program leadership for serving students with disabilities" VIrginia Department of Education 421-444, 1993

    21 Pugach, M. C., "Curriculum considerations, In Integrating general and special education" Merrill/ Macmillan 125-148, 1993

    22 Salend, S. J., "Creating Inclusive Classrooms : Effective and Reflective Practices" Merrill Prentice Hall 2001

    23 Bauwens, J., "Cooperative teaching : a model for general and special education integration" 10 (10): 17-22, 1989

    24 Donaldson, J., "Changing attitudes toward handicapped person : A review and analysis of research" 46 : 504-513, 1980

    25 Wood, J, W., "Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive setting" Merrill/Prentice Hall 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-02-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 대구대학교 한국특수교육문제연구소 -> 한국특수교육문제연구소
    영문명 : Daegu University Research Institute of the Korea Special Education -> Research Institute of the Korea Special Education
    KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-05-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국특수교육문제연구소 -> 대구대학교 한국특수교육문제연구소
    영문명 : Research Institute of the Korean Special Education -> Daegu University Research Institute of the Korea Special Education
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-16 학회명변경 한글명 : BK21특수교육교육연구단 -> 한국특수교육문제연구소
    영문명 : Bk21 Project Force Of Special Education -> Research Institute of the Korean Special Education
    KCI등재
    2006-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천 -> 특수교육저널:이론과 실천 KCI등재
    2006-05-18 학회명변경 한글명 : BK21특수교육교육연구단 -> 대구대학교 대학원 특수교육학과
    영문명 : Bk21 Project Force Of Special Education -> Daegu University Graduate School of Special Education
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.33 1.33 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.518 0.46
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼