RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      前提의 유형 = A Study on Types of Presupposition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104629602

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Moon, Keum-Hyun. 2004. A Study on Types of Presupposition. Korean Semantics, 14. This study focuses on types of presupposition in the Korean language. Chapter 2, 3 give a basic discussion concerning the definition, characteristics and the various types of presupposition. This study classifies types of presupposition in Korean as fixed and fluctuating presupposition and arranges representative generating mechanisms that cause presupposition. The various types of Korean presupposition are lexical, morphological, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. Chapter 4 examines presupposition generating mechanisms. First, this study presents prefix-derived words and constituent adverbs as representative generating mechanisms of lexical presupposition; particles, gerund final ending and subordinate conjunction endings as them of morphological presupposition; and quantifier sentences, cleft sentences and interrogative sentences as them of syntactical presupposition. Furthermore, semantic selectional restrictions are presented as them of semantic presupposition; and conversational participants, conversational situations, conversational maxims, courtesy speech, euphemism, expressions of indirect speech, and fixed ideas are presented as them of pragmatic presupposition. Using questionnaires, this study compares the differences of degree in which these generating mechanisms cause presupposition. The results of the questionnaires show that the generating mechanisms of lexical presupposition, including prefix-derived verbs, repetitive adverbs, descriptive adverbs, prefix-derived nouns and mimetic adverbs are the strongest generating mechanisms. This study verifies that the strength of presupposition derived from the lexical meaning of the vocabulary itself is greater than presupposition based on grammatical meaning in a sentence.
      번역하기

      Moon, Keum-Hyun. 2004. A Study on Types of Presupposition. Korean Semantics, 14. This study focuses on types of presupposition in the Korean language. Chapter 2, 3 give a basic discussion concerning the definition, characteristics and the various type...

      Moon, Keum-Hyun. 2004. A Study on Types of Presupposition. Korean Semantics, 14. This study focuses on types of presupposition in the Korean language. Chapter 2, 3 give a basic discussion concerning the definition, characteristics and the various types of presupposition. This study classifies types of presupposition in Korean as fixed and fluctuating presupposition and arranges representative generating mechanisms that cause presupposition. The various types of Korean presupposition are lexical, morphological, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. Chapter 4 examines presupposition generating mechanisms. First, this study presents prefix-derived words and constituent adverbs as representative generating mechanisms of lexical presupposition; particles, gerund final ending and subordinate conjunction endings as them of morphological presupposition; and quantifier sentences, cleft sentences and interrogative sentences as them of syntactical presupposition. Furthermore, semantic selectional restrictions are presented as them of semantic presupposition; and conversational participants, conversational situations, conversational maxims, courtesy speech, euphemism, expressions of indirect speech, and fixed ideas are presented as them of pragmatic presupposition. Using questionnaires, this study compares the differences of degree in which these generating mechanisms cause presupposition. The results of the questionnaires show that the generating mechanisms of lexical presupposition, including prefix-derived verbs, repetitive adverbs, descriptive adverbs, prefix-derived nouns and mimetic adverbs are the strongest generating mechanisms. This study verifies that the strength of presupposition derived from the lexical meaning of the vocabulary itself is greater than presupposition based on grammatical meaning in a sentence.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "화용론과 의미 해석-화행 전제,함축" 경성대 출판부 1998

      2 "한국어 화용론" 세종출판사 2003

      3 "전제의 화용론적 연구" 효성대학교 박사학위논문 1986

      4 "전제의 통사론적 양상 국어의 이해와 인식" 1991

      5 "전제의 의미론적 양상" 국어국문학회 1988

      6 "전제와 함축" 한국언어학회 5 : 1982

      7 "전제와 그 주변" 전북대 어문교육연구회 6 : 1984

      8 "전제 개념과 국어의 전제 분석" 건국대학교 석사학위논문 1987

      9 "전자담화에서의 전제 분석-인터넷 채팅을 중심으로-" 텍스트언어학회 (12) : 2002

      10 "의미와 문법 , Meaning and Grammar An Introduction to Semantics The Massachusetts Institute of Technology" 2004

      1 "화용론과 의미 해석-화행 전제,함축" 경성대 출판부 1998

      2 "한국어 화용론" 세종출판사 2003

      3 "전제의 화용론적 연구" 효성대학교 박사학위논문 1986

      4 "전제의 통사론적 양상 국어의 이해와 인식" 1991

      5 "전제의 의미론적 양상" 국어국문학회 1988

      6 "전제와 함축" 한국언어학회 5 : 1982

      7 "전제와 그 주변" 전북대 어문교육연구회 6 : 1984

      8 "전제 개념과 국어의 전제 분석" 건국대학교 석사학위논문 1987

      9 "전자담화에서의 전제 분석-인터넷 채팅을 중심으로-" 텍스트언어학회 (12) : 2002

      10 "의미와 문법 , Meaning and Grammar An Introduction to Semantics The Massachusetts Institute of Technology" 2004

      11 "언화의 화용적 연구" 1991

      12 "언어의 의미 현상-영어와 한국어 자료를 중심으로-" 한국문화사 2002

      13 "부정문의 전제-화용론을 중심으로-" 대구대학교 석사학위논문 1986

      14 "in Papers in Linguistics 5" 1972

      15 "Readings in Semantics University of Illinois Press" 19741892

      16 "Presupposition in Philosophy and Linguistics Studies in Linguistic Semantics" Inc 1971

      17 "Natural Language Semantics" Blackwell Publishers 2001

      18 "A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation Formal Methods in the Study of Language" 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.06 1.06 0.86
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.97 0.96 1.503 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼