RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    김수영과 프랑스 문학의 관련양상 = Kim Soo-Young and The French Literature

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76172824

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Kim, Soo-Young has been influenced deeply by Occidental Modern Literature. He sought for the essential stage of the Modernity. He didn't think that Occidental Modern Literature was this stage itself; he believed that it offered to him the exemplary attitude, arriving to it. This attitude can be called 'literature of self-betrayal' which Kim Soo- Young took for the imperative of the Modernity. He was taught this attitude by French poets and novelists. i.e. Rimbaud, Camus, Michel Butor, etc.
    But Kim, Soo-Young had ambivalence about French Literature. Despite the fact that he undoubtedly drew his literary guide from French poets and novelists, he exposed a subtle repugnance against the actual works of French literature. He thought that the Frenchmen were those who could appreciate the beauty. But he judged that the point was not the appreciation or the contemplation of the beauty, but the enforcement of it. He felt that, according to this judgment, French Literature had some distance from the authentic literature.
    One example is the poetry of Jules Supervielle. Kim Soo-Young was attracted by the theatricality of Supervielle' s poems. However he realized also that the attractiveness of Supervielle was more due to the self-contemplation of this theatricality than the theatricality itself and that, without this contemplation, the poetry would be fallen into the cheap popularity. If it is necessary that the theatrical poetry is accompanied by the self-contemplation, this poetry can't be in accord with the literature that Kim Soo-Young considered as authentic, because he thought that the authentic literature was not that of contemplation but the literature of enforcement.
    Therefore Kim Soo-Young quitted Supervielle since around 1961 and decided to return to the 'Common-sense' and 'Normality', what he had considered as Anglo-saxon. But he did not know how.
    The solution came when he read and translated "the wisdom of Giacometti" of Carlton Lake at 1966. In this article, he found that Giacometti grappled with same problems and the sculptor discovered his way. It was the hybrid of the common-sense and the strange in manner of the common-sensory expression evoking the invisible extraordinariness. Inspired by the sculptor. Kim Soo-Young applied his method with some detailed changes to his versification that he named 'Giacomettian transformation' and he associated allusively with Mallarme not with Anglo-saxon poetry. The result was, as he asserted, his poem "The Snow."
    But after this discovery, it does not seem that the theatricality was given u Two years before his death, from 1966 to 1968, is characterized as time of coexistence of two attitudes, i.e. that of theatricality and that of Giacomettian transformation. His prose "Spit, The Poetry!" and his poem "Variation on Love" are very theatrical, while his last poem "The Grass" have come across into the reader's mind the Giacomettian transformation.
    번역하기

    Kim, Soo-Young has been influenced deeply by Occidental Modern Literature. He sought for the essential stage of the Modernity. He didn't think that Occidental Modern Literature was this stage itself; he believed that it offered to him the exemplary at...

    Kim, Soo-Young has been influenced deeply by Occidental Modern Literature. He sought for the essential stage of the Modernity. He didn't think that Occidental Modern Literature was this stage itself; he believed that it offered to him the exemplary attitude, arriving to it. This attitude can be called 'literature of self-betrayal' which Kim Soo- Young took for the imperative of the Modernity. He was taught this attitude by French poets and novelists. i.e. Rimbaud, Camus, Michel Butor, etc.
    But Kim, Soo-Young had ambivalence about French Literature. Despite the fact that he undoubtedly drew his literary guide from French poets and novelists, he exposed a subtle repugnance against the actual works of French literature. He thought that the Frenchmen were those who could appreciate the beauty. But he judged that the point was not the appreciation or the contemplation of the beauty, but the enforcement of it. He felt that, according to this judgment, French Literature had some distance from the authentic literature.
    One example is the poetry of Jules Supervielle. Kim Soo-Young was attracted by the theatricality of Supervielle' s poems. However he realized also that the attractiveness of Supervielle was more due to the self-contemplation of this theatricality than the theatricality itself and that, without this contemplation, the poetry would be fallen into the cheap popularity. If it is necessary that the theatrical poetry is accompanied by the self-contemplation, this poetry can't be in accord with the literature that Kim Soo-Young considered as authentic, because he thought that the authentic literature was not that of contemplation but the literature of enforcement.
    Therefore Kim Soo-Young quitted Supervielle since around 1961 and decided to return to the 'Common-sense' and 'Normality', what he had considered as Anglo-saxon. But he did not know how.
    The solution came when he read and translated "the wisdom of Giacometti" of Carlton Lake at 1966. In this article, he found that Giacometti grappled with same problems and the sculptor discovered his way. It was the hybrid of the common-sense and the strange in manner of the common-sensory expression evoking the invisible extraordinariness. Inspired by the sculptor. Kim Soo-Young applied his method with some detailed changes to his versification that he named 'Giacomettian transformation' and he associated allusively with Mallarme not with Anglo-saxon poetry. The result was, as he asserted, his poem "The Snow."
    But after this discovery, it does not seem that the theatricality was given u Two years before his death, from 1966 to 1968, is characterized as time of coexistence of two attitudes, i.e. that of theatricality and that of Giacomettian transformation. His prose "Spit, The Poetry!" and his poem "Variation on Love" are very theatrical, while his last poem "The Grass" have come across into the reader's mind the Giacomettian transformation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 현대의 명령
    • Ⅱ. 프랑스 문학ㆍ예술에 대한 미묘한 양가감정
    • Ⅲ. 언어와 행동: 연극성의 문제
    • Ⅳ. 자코메티적 변모
    • Ⅴ. 두 경향의 공존
    • Ⅰ. 현대의 명령
    • Ⅱ. 프랑스 문학ㆍ예술에 대한 미묘한 양가감정
    • Ⅲ. 언어와 행동: 연극성의 문제
    • Ⅳ. 자코메티적 변모
    • Ⅴ. 두 경향의 공존
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼