김소월 시에 나타난 경계인의 내면 풍경 -새로 발굴된 초기시 세 편을 중심으로 = The Marginal Man`s Inward Landscape in Kim Sowol`s Early Poems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

By way of mixing heterogeneous voices in modern poetry, Kim So-wol(김소월) created the poetic discourse of negating the colonial modernity. It was one of the alternative voices which could recall the residual culture which had been repressed by the dominant culture, and reveal the barbarousness that all cultural records and historical process had concealed, and disrupt the identity of colonial discourse internally. So I think Kim So-wol`s poetic discourse can arouse a lot of reader`s sympathy today. In this paper, I attempted to evaluate Kim Sowol`s three early works, “The Street of Seoul”(서울의 거리), “Majusuk”(마주석), “Kunginchang”(궁인창), which were discovered recently by the magazin “Hyundaemunhak” (현대문학). “The Street of Seoul”(서울의 거리) shows the inward landscape of the marginal man who was able to select neither the traditional world nor the cononial-modern world. And in this work, it proves that Kim So-wol`s revolving to Traditionalism came from the extreme sense of alienation and despair of the colonial intellectuals. Especially “the Poetic I” in this work shows us the split of vision and identity because of inability to adapt himself to the colonial-modern society. I think that these aspects of the work could be found in Jung Jiyong`s poetry written in late 1920`s again. But Unfortunately Kim So-wol did not persue this critical way of expressing the colonial world any more. It was the expressing the Voice flowing out from the horizon of tradition that Kim So-wol concerned. In other word, He selected the Traditionalism instead of the sensitive description of Modernity and the critical approach to Modernity. In Kim So-wol`s Traditionalism poems, the audible is more important than the visible, and the transcendental world is more important than the phenomenal world. This revolving to Traditionalism can be found more clearly in the works, “Majusuk”(마주석), “Kunginchang”(궁인창). In the work Majusuk”(마주석), Kim So-wol shows us the nostalgia toward the original world that can be captured only in the form of shadow. In this work, the poetic “I” rediscovered the ancestor`s soul. It shows that Kim So-wol wanted to express the voice of the others who could not be erased by the colonial discourse. And in the work “Kunginchang”(궁인창), Kim So-wol prepared the way of mixing the voice of tradition flowing out from the horizon of modern times into lyrical poetry. So we can say that the voice of tradition in Kim So-wol`s poetry, especially in “Chohon”(초혼) was formed in this way

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "현대시에서 전통적 정신의 존재형식과 그 의미" 한국국어교육연구학회 1998

2 "한국현대시의 비판적 연구" 월인 2001

3 "한국현대시론사" 고려원 1993

4 "한국문학의 근대와 반근대-1930년대 후반기 문학의 전통주의 연구" 1991

5 "정지용 시에서 병적인 헤매임과 그 극복의 문제" 신구문화사 1998

6 "전통시의 형성, 20세기 한국시의 사적 조명" 태학사 2003

7 "여백의 존재성" 책읽는 사람 1993

8 "샤머니즘의 근대적 계승과 시학적 양상-김소월을 중심으로" 18 : 2002

9 "발터 벤야민의 문예이론" 민음사 1983

10 "문장파 전통주의의 현대적 성격 연구" 26 : 1998

11 "모던의 유혹 모던의 눈물" 생각의 나무 2004

12 "대도시와 거리 산보자" 1993

13 "김소월의 진달래꽃과 샤마니즘" 민족문학사연구 2003

14 "김소월의 시에 형상화된 ‘사랑’의 근대적 의미" 12 : 2000

15 "김소월 연구" 태학사 1994

16 "김소월 시와 천기론" 47 : 2002

17 "김소월 그 삶과 문학" 서울대학교 출판부 2000

18 "근대적 시선의 체계와 주체화" 새길 1997

19 "거울에 비친 초기 시의 미의식" 2004.5

20 "20년대 한국 민족주의 문학" 20세기한국시연구 1989

21 "1920년대 한국시의 근대성 연구1-소월의 시를 중심으로" 문학과 지성사 1995