여성폭력추방운동의 역사적 맥락과 제도화 과정의 차이 = 미국과 영국의 사례를 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 강간위기센터(RCC)와 여성쉼터(BWS) 조직의 활동이 가장 먼저 시작된 미국과 영국의 여성폭력추방운동을 고찰함으로써 제도화 과정에서 나타나는 두 나라 운동의 국가별 차이와 성폭력/가정폭력 부문의 차이를 역사적 맥락 속에서 분석하려는 시도이다. 오늘날 각국의 여성폭력추방운동은 ‘제도화’와 관련된 논란에 둘러싸여 있다. 제도화가 과연 운동의 성공이냐 실패냐의 논란에도 불구하고, 그것은 흔히 비가역적인 과정이나 결과로 간주되고 자율성의 상실과 직결되는 것으로 여겨져 왔다. 그러나 자율성과 제도화에 관한 이항대립적인 접근이나 역사적 맥락으로부터 추상화된 논의는 운동과 국가의 역학 관계를 비롯하여 제도화 과정의 실질적인 차이를 변별하기 어려운 한계가 있다. 여성폭력추방운동이 형성되고 발전하는 역사적 맥락이 상이하다면, 자율성을 뒷받침하는 운동의 역량은 물론 제도화의 과정 역시 동일하지 않을 것이다. 이 연구에서는 미국과 영국의 초기 RCC/BWS와 같은 페미니스트조직의 자율성을 재검토하고, 영미 운동의 전개 과정에서 나타나는 조직의 변화와 제도화의 양상을 살펴봄으로써 그 가능성을 타진하였다. 영미의 여성폭력추방운동은 급진적 담론의 정치를 배경으로 소집합체의 특성을 갖는 현장운동이 활성화됨으로써 시작되었다는 점에서 유사하지만, 미국은 강간 피해자들을 상담하고 지원하는 RCC 형태의 조직들이 먼저 출현하였고 영국은 매맞는 여성들에게 피난처를 제공하는 BWS 조직이 우세를 점하는 가운데 RCC가 뒤늦게 나타났다. 두 나라에서 RCC/BWS 조직을 특징짓는 연대의 발전은 차이가 있으며, 영국의 경우 가정폭력 부문의 BWS 조직은 여성주의 원칙과 자율적 역량을 바탕으로 영향력을 갖게 되었으나 성폭력 부문의 RCC 조직은 국가로부터 배제되었다. 영미 운동에 대한 역사적 고찰과 RCC/BWS 조직에 초점을 맞춘 분석의 결과는 자율성과 제도화의 딜레마가 단순히 국가의 재정 지원을 수락하느냐의 여부로 풀릴 수 없는 문제이며, 현실의 제도화 과정이 ‘자율적 운동’과 ‘제도화된 운동’의 선명한 구분으로 환원되지 않는 다양한 스펙트럼을 포함하고 있음을 시사한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explores the historical process of the women's movement to end violence against women(the VAW movement) in the U.S. and the U.K. where rape crisis center(RCC) and battered women's shelter(BWS) firstly started their activities. Its aim is to analyze the difference shown in the institutionalization processes between the sexual violence and the domestic violence sectors in the two nations, focusing on the historical context that has constructed the characteristics of the movements.
Although the violence against women was one of the most critical issues raised by the radical politics of the second-wave feminism, the VAW movement has become the site of heated controversies over the 'institutionalization'. The adverse effects caused by the institutionalization, which has often been pointed out in the debate over the VAW movement, can be encapsulated into bureaucratization, professionalization, and service-oriented change of the organization. In spite of the debate over whether the institutionalization is a success or a failure of the movement, it has been regarded as an irreversible process or a result and the cause to the loss of autonomy.
However, the binary-oppositional approach to autonomy or institutionalization, and the discussion abstracted from historical contexts are likely to fail to clarify the actual differences shown in the institutionalization process such as power dynamics between the movement and the government. If the movement has been formed and developed in different historical contexts, not only the capacities of the movement to claim for autonomy but also the institutionalization process would not be the same. In order to explore the feasibility of the above claim, I reviewed the autonomy of the feminist organizations such as the early RCC and BWS of the U.S. and the U.K. and examined the organizational change and the various aspects of the institutionalization in the development of their movements.
Analyzing the institutionalization process of the VAW movement of the two nations, this study put focus on the organizational characteristic of RCC and BWS and the difference of their coalition-building processes as well as the differences between the two nations. They bear some similarities in that the VAW movement was firstly initiated by the small groups in the local regions in the background of the politics of radical discourse. However, in the U.S. RCC types of organizations that gave empowerment and support to the rape survivors firstly appeared, while the BWS that provided shelters to the battered women appeared earlier than RCC in the U.K. The two nations also show differences in the coalition or alliance development of the two organizations. In the U.K., the BWS has exerted the influence, staying at the feminist principle and autonomous power, while the feminist RCC has been excluded from the government. The historical examination of the movements in the U.S. and the U.K. and the analysis centered on the RCC/BWS organization show the findings that the dilemma between autonomy and institutionalization cannot be solved only by the decision whether to accept the financial support from the government or not. The current institutionalization process has a variety of aspects, in which the ‘autonomous movement' cannot be sharply separated from the ‘institutionalized movement.'

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 운동의 기원과 조직의 탄생: 강간위기센터(RCC)와 여성쉼터(BWS)
• Ⅲ. 초기 페미니스트조직의 자율성과 딜레마
• Ⅳ. 영미 운동을 둘러싼 제도화의 논란
• Ⅴ. 제도화 과정의 국가별 차이와 부문별 차이
• Ⅵ. 맺으며
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "＂한국 반(反)성폭력운동의 제도화와 자율성에 관한 연구＂" 2007

2 "＂여성운동의 제도화와 자율성: 호주, 브라질, 미국의 사례를 중심으로＂" 115-139, 1998

3 "＂여성운동의 제도화, 운동정치의 확대인가 제도정치로의 흡수인가＂" (16) : 8-34, 2005

4 "＂반여성폭력과제의 제도화와 한국여성운동＂, 일본 ‘전국쉼터심포지움’" 2004

5 "한국의 유권자는 지역주의에 의해 투표하나" 35 (35): 113-134, 2001

6 "한국 反성폭력운동의 제도화 과정과 효과에 관한 연구" 2006

7 "지방정부와 국가이론" 847-861, 1993

8 "정치적 기회구조의 변화와 ‘진보적’ 여성운동의 제도화" 2002

9 "영국 노숙자연구" 28 (28): 235-275, 2005

10 "여성운동과 국가의 관계에 관한 연구 성폭력특별법과 가정폭력방지법 제정운동을 중심으로" 2000

11 "성폭력과 사회복지" 강남대학교 출판부 2001

12 "복지국가 가족지원체계의 구조변화에 관한 일연구 가족수당과 보육지원 프로그램을 중심으로" 2002

13 "법제화 운동을 중심으로 본 한국여성운동의 제도화와 위기론" 15 (15): 108-282, 2007

14 "‘진보적’ 여성운동의 전환을 위한 모색 창작과 비평" (125) : 55-69, 2004

15 "^European Information Centre Against Violence Against Women" 2002

16 "Women's Movements and State Policy Reform Aimed at Domestic Violence Against Women A Comparison of the Consequences of Movement Mobilization in the U" 587-608, 1992

17 "Violence Against Women Act: History, Federal Funding, and Reauthorizing Legislation" 2001

18 "University of California Press" 1989

19 "Theorizing Feminist Policy" New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 2002

20 "The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe" Temple University Press 1987

21 "The Women's Liberation Movement in America" Westport: Greenwood Press. 1999

22 "The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement" South End Press 1982

23 "The Survival of an Ideal? in Working with Violence" Macmillan 1994

24 "The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for New Century," Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. 1998

25 "The Reality for Women" The Women's Press 1984

26 "The Politics of New Social Movements" Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press 1995

27 "The Origins of the Women's Liberation Movement American Journal of Sociology" 792-811, 1973

28 "The New Feminist Movement across Three Decade of Change" Twayne Publishers 1994

29 "The Movement for Women's Liberation in Britain and the United States" MacMillan Press 1983

30 "The First Sourcebook For Women" 1974

31 "The Diffusion of Consciousness in the United States and Western Europe in The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe" Temple University Press 1987

32 "The City after Castells" Martin Press 1986

33 "The Battered Women Movement and the Creation of the Wife Beating Problem" 207-220, 1982

34 "Services for Sexual Assault Survivors: The Role of Rape Crisis Centers" Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2001

35 "Remembering the past but looking to the future" 2004

36 "Remaining Radical? Organizational Predictors of Rape Crisis Centers' Social Change Initiatives" 26 (26): 457-483, 1998

37 "Rape Crisis Federation of Wales and England"

38 "Radical or Reformist?" 61-63, 1989

39 "Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison" Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 2002

40 "Professionalising the Response to Rape Multi-Agency Work and Strategies for Survival in Working with Violence" Under Pressure Macmillan 1994

41 "Outsider Issues and Insider Tactics: Strategic Tensions in the Women's Policy Network during the 1980＂" Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1995

42 "New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies" in Challenging the Political Order Polity Press 1990

43 "National Coalition Against Domestic Violence"

44 "National Alliance to End Sexual Violence"

45 "NILECJ[National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice] A Report for Citizens National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice" 1975

46 "Multi-Agency Work and Strategies for Survival in Working with Violence" Under Pressure Macmillan 1994

47 "Moving onto the Terrain of the State: The Battered Women's Movement and the Politics of Engagement＂" Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1995

48 "Institutionalization of Protest during Democratic Consolidation in Central Europe" Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc 1998

49 "Feminist politics in the United States and West Germany in The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe" Temple University Press 1987

50 "Feminist Social Movements and Policy Change: Devolution, Childcare and Domestic Violence Policies in Wales＂," 29 : 172-183, 2006

51 "Feminist Politics, Domestic Violence and the State" 43 (43): 617-640, 1995

52 "Feminist Organization: Harvest of the New Women's Movement" Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1995

53 "Feminism, the State and Social Policy" Basingstoke: Macmillan 2000

54 "Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation" 1996

55 "Creating New Forms of Welfare?’ in Women and Social Policy" Macmillan 1985

56 "Contentious Politics in Complex Societies: New Social Movements between Conflict and Cooperation＂" New York: Rowman & Littlefield 1998

57 "Contemporary British Feminism: A Social Movement in Abeyance" 1 (1): 169-185, 2002

58 "Constitution and Maintenance of Feminist Practice: Comparative Case Study of Sexual Assault Centres in Australia and Korea" Doctoral Thesis, University of New South Wales 2002

59 "Comparative State Feminism" 1995

60 "Common Market of Violence" R.I: Berghahn Books. 1996

61 "Clinical and Community Approaches to Treatment" Lexington The Stephen Greene Press 1987

62 "Challenges of Success Stages of Growth in Feminist Organizations" 275-300, 1994

63 "An Alternative to Rational-Bureaucratic Models" 509-527, 1979

64 "A Comparative Analysis of Feminism in the United States and the United Kingdom in The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe" Temple University 1987