RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    역사학습의 인식론적 모색 = An Epistemological Reorientation of Research on History Teaching

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76103992

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In spite of the increasing interests and the expansive body of literature on the history teaching scholarship, the very nature, conceptualizations, and theoretical framework of the field have remained obscure and unexamined. The present discourses on history teaching are subjected to critical scrutiny in this study, as I attempt to explore new theoretical approaches that challenge current issues and frameworks.
    The research on history teaching and its practical applications have reflected, if not premised on, the positivistic assumptions which seek to deliberate the objective historical knowledge. As a consequence the discourse on history teaching has limited itself only to confined methodological aspects, without broadening its vision into historical epistemology. In these circumstances, the dominant discussion on the historical thinking skills should be reexamined in the view of historical problematization.
    The new approach on history teaching should be focused on the historical problematization of history teacher, that is, how history teacher problematizes the past with respect to teaching history. And the epistemological basis of the new approach should be reoriented toward historicization. The historicization informs the historical and social contextsin which the knowledge and theories are produced and articulated. And also, it entails the criticism of the social and linguistic conventions by which the specific knowledge is defined. In this sense, the teachers" perspective-taking and interpreting process, which is problematization must rise to the core of the discourse. And the epistemo-logical reorientation toward historicization will be able to extend and widen the discourse on history teaching.
    번역하기

    In spite of the increasing interests and the expansive body of literature on the history teaching scholarship, the very nature, conceptualizations, and theoretical framework of the field have remained obscure and unexamined. The present discourses o...

    In spite of the increasing interests and the expansive body of literature on the history teaching scholarship, the very nature, conceptualizations, and theoretical framework of the field have remained obscure and unexamined. The present discourses on history teaching are subjected to critical scrutiny in this study, as I attempt to explore new theoretical approaches that challenge current issues and frameworks.
    The research on history teaching and its practical applications have reflected, if not premised on, the positivistic assumptions which seek to deliberate the objective historical knowledge. As a consequence the discourse on history teaching has limited itself only to confined methodological aspects, without broadening its vision into historical epistemology. In these circumstances, the dominant discussion on the historical thinking skills should be reexamined in the view of historical problematization.
    The new approach on history teaching should be focused on the historical problematization of history teacher, that is, how history teacher problematizes the past with respect to teaching history. And the epistemological basis of the new approach should be reoriented toward historicization. The historicization informs the historical and social contextsin which the knowledge and theories are produced and articulated. And also, it entails the criticism of the social and linguistic conventions by which the specific knowledge is defined. In this sense, the teachers" perspective-taking and interpreting process, which is problematization must rise to the core of the discourse. And the epistemo-logical reorientation toward historicization will be able to extend and widen the discourse on history teaching.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 역사학습에 관한 시각과 담론의 문제점
    • 3. 인식론적 전환의 가능성과 방향
    • 4. 맺음말
    • Abstract
    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 역사학습에 관한 시각과 담론의 문제점
    • 3. 인식론적 전환의 가능성과 방향
    • 4. 맺음말
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼