RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      읽고 쓰기 교육을 통한 주체 형성 = Subject formation by reading and writing education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102063090

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      When we discuss how and what to teach in language education, the point is what the language is like. That is because the difference in understanding language should result in the variation of language teaching. Up to now language education has focused on teaching students to use formal and accurate language, which is based on the assumption that subject is united, and consequently they can control themselves in using language. In this case, language is nothing but a means to communicate with others. Therefore, this kind of language teaching does not consider the importance of individual education but only stresses the rule of language usage. Lacan claimed that subject is established by routine language usage. With the viewpoint of Lacan, the subject does not just use language as a means, but language affects him(her). So language is not a transparent means, and the subject is not united any more. From a Lacanian viewpoint, the aim of teaching is not to make students have a language competence to a certain level, but to make them watch their subjectivity which is formed by language force and participate in that forming. In this paper I suggest ``reading and writing`` education. Reading and writing is successive activity. After reading literature, students may write about their reading experience. So it is self-reflective writing which focuses on what the literature means to themselves. This approach does not focus on the formal and structural analysis but the relation between ``I`` and literature.
      번역하기

      When we discuss how and what to teach in language education, the point is what the language is like. That is because the difference in understanding language should result in the variation of language teaching. Up to now language education has focused...

      When we discuss how and what to teach in language education, the point is what the language is like. That is because the difference in understanding language should result in the variation of language teaching. Up to now language education has focused on teaching students to use formal and accurate language, which is based on the assumption that subject is united, and consequently they can control themselves in using language. In this case, language is nothing but a means to communicate with others. Therefore, this kind of language teaching does not consider the importance of individual education but only stresses the rule of language usage. Lacan claimed that subject is established by routine language usage. With the viewpoint of Lacan, the subject does not just use language as a means, but language affects him(her). So language is not a transparent means, and the subject is not united any more. From a Lacanian viewpoint, the aim of teaching is not to make students have a language competence to a certain level, but to make them watch their subjectivity which is formed by language force and participate in that forming. In this paper I suggest ``reading and writing`` education. Reading and writing is successive activity. After reading literature, students may write about their reading experience. So it is self-reflective writing which focuses on what the literature means to themselves. This approach does not focus on the formal and structural analysis but the relation between ``I`` and literature.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼