RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    지구단위계획의 운영실태 및 개선방안에 관한 연구 -송파구 지구단위계획의 조정심의 결과 및 문제점을 중심으로- = The Improvement Direction of District Unit Plan through the Case Analysis of Civil Petitions' Review Results

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104641148

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    초록



    The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment. The results are as follows : Firstly, the guidelines that generate most civil petitions are associated with Joint-Development and building form such as roof design. So the use of Joint-Development regulation need to be cautious to reduce the impingement of private properties and administrative charges. Instead of using compulsory regulations, community participation should be seeked at the time of plan making or make better use of incentive regulations to voluntarily make private developers to follow development guidelines.
    Secondly, the submission of development to the District Unit Plan's Adjustment Review tend to be decided on a case by case basis, quite often with different principal or standard at each occasion. Therefore in order to promote a more just review process, previous results of similar review cases should be available for both reviewers and public. Next, the expansion of Joint-Development can cause the problem of urban skyline, urban form, etc. and result in quite a different urban environment that's originally planned. Therefore, the decision on Joint-Development should be made through comprehensive examination of development scale before and after. Also windfall profits through the development should be recaptured by the incorporation of preferred uses such as welfare facilities and community amenities. In order to reduce the number of 'Adjustment Reviews' that take up much administrative time and capacity, important policy changes and review principals should be made public through various forms of media. If these suggested improvement directions are taken into account at plan making stage or in the operation of reviews, the current system of District Unit Plan may be improved.
    번역하기

    초록 The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment....

    초록



    The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment. The results are as follows : Firstly, the guidelines that generate most civil petitions are associated with Joint-Development and building form such as roof design. So the use of Joint-Development regulation need to be cautious to reduce the impingement of private properties and administrative charges. Instead of using compulsory regulations, community participation should be seeked at the time of plan making or make better use of incentive regulations to voluntarily make private developers to follow development guidelines.
    Secondly, the submission of development to the District Unit Plan's Adjustment Review tend to be decided on a case by case basis, quite often with different principal or standard at each occasion. Therefore in order to promote a more just review process, previous results of similar review cases should be available for both reviewers and public. Next, the expansion of Joint-Development can cause the problem of urban skyline, urban form, etc. and result in quite a different urban environment that's originally planned. Therefore, the decision on Joint-Development should be made through comprehensive examination of development scale before and after. Also windfall profits through the development should be recaptured by the incorporation of preferred uses such as welfare facilities and community amenities. In order to reduce the number of 'Adjustment Reviews' that take up much administrative time and capacity, important policy changes and review principals should be made public through various forms of media. If these suggested improvement directions are taken into account at plan making stage or in the operation of reviews, the current system of District Unit Plan may be improved.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료" 송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료 2001.2-2004.9

    2 "서울시 지구단위계획 재정비 방안마련을 위한 연구" 서울특별시 한국도시설계학회 2002.12

    3 "서울시 지구단위계획 운영평가와 개선방향 연구" 시정개발연구원 2002

    4 "서울 도시설계의 재점검" 1998.3

    5 "물리적 공간 컨트롤을 위한 신도시 도시설계 가이드라인 연구" 국토계획 38 (국토계획 38): 2003.10

    6 "도시설계지침의 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구" 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문 1996.8

    7 "도시설계 이론편." 대한국토도시계획학회 2001

    1 "송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료" 송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료 2001.2-2004.9

    2 "서울시 지구단위계획 재정비 방안마련을 위한 연구" 서울특별시 한국도시설계학회 2002.12

    3 "서울시 지구단위계획 운영평가와 개선방향 연구" 시정개발연구원 2002

    4 "서울 도시설계의 재점검" 1998.3

    5 "물리적 공간 컨트롤을 위한 신도시 도시설계 가이드라인 연구" 국토계획 38 (국토계획 38): 2003.10

    6 "도시설계지침의 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구" 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문 1996.8

    7 "도시설계 이론편." 대한국토도시계획학회 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
    외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼