초록 The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment....

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104641148
2005
Korean
Urban Design ; District Unit Plan ; Civil Petition ; Review Analysis ; 도시설계 ; 지구단위계획 ; 민원 ; 조정심의
KCI등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
227-236(10쪽)
5
0
상세조회0
다운로드초록 The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment....
초록
The purpose of this study is to identify problems in the District Unit Plan through the case analysis of civil petitions of Songpa district and to present directions for improvement of the District Unit Plan to enhance the urban environment. The results are as follows : Firstly, the guidelines that generate most civil petitions are associated with Joint-Development and building form such as roof design. So the use of Joint-Development regulation need to be cautious to reduce the impingement of private properties and administrative charges. Instead of using compulsory regulations, community participation should be seeked at the time of plan making or make better use of incentive regulations to voluntarily make private developers to follow development guidelines.
Secondly, the submission of development to the District Unit Plan's Adjustment Review tend to be decided on a case by case basis, quite often with different principal or standard at each occasion. Therefore in order to promote a more just review process, previous results of similar review cases should be available for both reviewers and public. Next, the expansion of Joint-Development can cause the problem of urban skyline, urban form, etc. and result in quite a different urban environment that's originally planned. Therefore, the decision on Joint-Development should be made through comprehensive examination of development scale before and after. Also windfall profits through the development should be recaptured by the incorporation of preferred uses such as welfare facilities and community amenities. In order to reduce the number of 'Adjustment Reviews' that take up much administrative time and capacity, important policy changes and review principals should be made public through various forms of media. If these suggested improvement directions are taken into account at plan making stage or in the operation of reviews, the current system of District Unit Plan may be improved.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료" 송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료 2001.2-2004.9
2 "서울시 지구단위계획 재정비 방안마련을 위한 연구" 서울특별시 한국도시설계학회 2002.12
3 "서울시 지구단위계획 운영평가와 개선방향 연구" 시정개발연구원 2002
4 "서울 도시설계의 재점검" 1998.3
5 "물리적 공간 컨트롤을 위한 신도시 도시설계 가이드라인 연구" 국토계획 38 (국토계획 38): 2003.10
6 "도시설계지침의 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구" 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문 1996.8
7 "도시설계 이론편." 대한국토도시계획학회 2001
1 "송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료" 송파구 도시계획위원회 심의자료 2001.2-2004.9
2 "서울시 지구단위계획 재정비 방안마련을 위한 연구" 서울특별시 한국도시설계학회 2002.12
3 "서울시 지구단위계획 운영평가와 개선방향 연구" 시정개발연구원 2002
4 "서울 도시설계의 재점검" 1998.3
5 "물리적 공간 컨트롤을 위한 신도시 도시설계 가이드라인 연구" 국토계획 38 (국토계획 38): 2003.10
6 "도시설계지침의 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구" 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문 1996.8
7 "도시설계 이론편." 대한국토도시계획학회 2001
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-03-25 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-08-02 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-10-14 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1999-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.41 | 0.4 | 0.742 | 0.11 |