RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문학작품 번역에서 문화 적용의 문제 = The Adoptation of Cultural Elements in Literary Translation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45004719

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After the 1970s, a transitional period from to pragmatism in
    linguistics, meant that text-linguistics was used for translation studies.
    It was only during the late 1980s that the concept of culture was
    introduced into translation studies. Since then, translation studies have
    seen a dynamic development which has its roots in holistic-gestalt
    principles from the prototypical theory. These developments have
    resulted in the transition to Skopostheorie. This theory puts more
    emphasis on the function of target language texts than on the original
    language.
    For the last twenty or more years, translation scholars have paid
    attention to culture in their studies and have recognised that it was
    crucial to begin inter-cultural studies for the optimal translation. As
    was shown by the Wortfeldtheorie, each language has different
    systems of concepts and values. To put it more simply, translation is a
    matter of culture, not a matter of transferring linguistic signs. This
    realization helped to make the Skopostheorie seem valid to the
    scholars' eyes.
    What counts most here is to set up a concrete concept of culture that
    helps to clarify the relation between a culture as social system and the
    features of it expressed in text. When Heinrich's defined culture
    recently as a specific constructional system that can be
    sub-categorized, he enabled systemization of cultural factors in the
    texts. This progress forms the core of Skopostheorie and is expected to
    be of great influence to the theory.
    The author's point of view is that culture, or the fundamentals of
    Skopostheorie, consists of diverse factors differences and coincidences.
    Therefore, it is very hard to define the concept of ‘function’itself. This
    leads to the conclusion that inter-disciplinary efforts are crucial for the
    further development of the theory.
    In addition, it will be of benefit to introduce the concept of
    ‘Funktionem’in order to organize a more systemized and objective
    cultural translation theory.
    번역하기

    After the 1970s, a transitional period from to pragmatism in linguistics, meant that text-linguistics was used for translation studies. It was only during the late 1980s that the concept of culture was introduced into translation studies. Since the...

    After the 1970s, a transitional period from to pragmatism in
    linguistics, meant that text-linguistics was used for translation studies.
    It was only during the late 1980s that the concept of culture was
    introduced into translation studies. Since then, translation studies have
    seen a dynamic development which has its roots in holistic-gestalt
    principles from the prototypical theory. These developments have
    resulted in the transition to Skopostheorie. This theory puts more
    emphasis on the function of target language texts than on the original
    language.
    For the last twenty or more years, translation scholars have paid
    attention to culture in their studies and have recognised that it was
    crucial to begin inter-cultural studies for the optimal translation. As
    was shown by the Wortfeldtheorie, each language has different
    systems of concepts and values. To put it more simply, translation is a
    matter of culture, not a matter of transferring linguistic signs. This
    realization helped to make the Skopostheorie seem valid to the
    scholars' eyes.
    What counts most here is to set up a concrete concept of culture that
    helps to clarify the relation between a culture as social system and the
    features of it expressed in text. When Heinrich's defined culture
    recently as a specific constructional system that can be
    sub-categorized, he enabled systemization of cultural factors in the
    texts. This progress forms the core of Skopostheorie and is expected to
    be of great influence to the theory.
    The author's point of view is that culture, or the fundamentals of
    Skopostheorie, consists of diverse factors differences and coincidences.
    Therefore, it is very hard to define the concept of ‘function’itself. This
    leads to the conclusion that inter-disciplinary efforts are crucial for the
    further development of the theory.
    In addition, it will be of benefit to introduce the concept of
    ‘Funktionem’in order to organize a more systemized and objective
    cultural translation theory.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 문제의 제기
    • 2. 인간의 사고와 언어 및 문화
    • 3. 번역과 문화의 상관성
    • 4. 최적의 번역과 목적이론
    • 4.1. 어휘의 측면
    • 1. 문제의 제기
    • 2. 인간의 사고와 언어 및 문화
    • 3. 번역과 문화의 상관성
    • 4. 최적의 번역과 목적이론
    • 4.1. 어휘의 측면
    • 4.2. 텍스트의 측면
    • 5. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼