RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    담화유형별 선호 논항 구조 = Discourse Genres and Preferred Argument Structures

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76196865

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Contending that grammar is not enough to explain cognitive frames and processes of interlocutors of a discourse, and that analyses of spoken discourses reveal more of those characteristics than written discourses, Du Bois(2001) claims that there is a particular pattern lying at the intersection of spoken discourse and grammar: Preferred Argument Structure (PAS). This paper examines whether PAS constraints can be applied to any types of discourses. Four different genres of discourses in English including drama scripts, letters, essays, and newspaper articles are analyzed to find out what kinds of differences there exist, if any, between these different types of discourses. The statistical analysis reveals that Du Bois' PAS constraints are generally obeyed even in written discourse, but that the more typical of written discourse a discourse text is, the higher the ratio of lexical arguments in the subject position of transitive verbs is. It also shows that newspaper articles, which are regarded as most typical examples of written discourse, may not observe the PAS constraints.
    번역하기

    Contending that grammar is not enough to explain cognitive frames and processes of interlocutors of a discourse, and that analyses of spoken discourses reveal more of those characteristics than written discourses, Du Bois(2001) claims that there is a ...

    Contending that grammar is not enough to explain cognitive frames and processes of interlocutors of a discourse, and that analyses of spoken discourses reveal more of those characteristics than written discourses, Du Bois(2001) claims that there is a particular pattern lying at the intersection of spoken discourse and grammar: Preferred Argument Structure (PAS). This paper examines whether PAS constraints can be applied to any types of discourses. Four different genres of discourses in English including drama scripts, letters, essays, and newspaper articles are analyzed to find out what kinds of differences there exist, if any, between these different types of discourses. The statistical analysis reveals that Du Bois' PAS constraints are generally obeyed even in written discourse, but that the more typical of written discourse a discourse text is, the higher the ratio of lexical arguments in the subject position of transitive verbs is. It also shows that newspaper articles, which are regarded as most typical examples of written discourse, may not observe the PAS constraints.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 들어가기
    • 2. 구어담화의 선호 논항 구조
    • 3. 담화유형별 선호 논항 구조
    • 4. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 들어가기
    • 2. 구어담화의 선호 논항 구조
    • 3. 담화유형별 선호 논항 구조
    • 4. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Grosz, "a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse" Centering 202-225, 1995

    2 Vaullduv, Enric, "The linguistic realization of information packaging" 459-34 519, 1996

    3 by Elisabet Engdahl, "The dynamics of information packaging Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches ed University of Edinburgh" 4-26, 1994

    4 Du Bois,John, "The discourse basis of ergativity" 63 : 805-855, 1987

    5 Dixon, "Studies in ergativity" 1-71 16, 1987

    6 Harris,Zellig, "Methods in structural linguistics" University of Chicago Press 1951

    7 Engdahl, Elisabet, "Information packaging in HPSG,Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science" 1-31, 1996

    8 Silverstein, "Hierarchy of features and ergativity Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages ed by by Robert M" Humanities Press 112-171, 1976

    9 Dekker, "Files in focus Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches ed University of Edinburgh" 29-37, 1994

    10 Du Bois,John, "Discourse and grammar" 2001

    1 Grosz, "a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse" Centering 202-225, 1995

    2 Vaullduv, Enric, "The linguistic realization of information packaging" 459-34 519, 1996

    3 by Elisabet Engdahl, "The dynamics of information packaging Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches ed University of Edinburgh" 4-26, 1994

    4 Du Bois,John, "The discourse basis of ergativity" 63 : 805-855, 1987

    5 Dixon, "Studies in ergativity" 1-71 16, 1987

    6 Harris,Zellig, "Methods in structural linguistics" University of Chicago Press 1951

    7 Engdahl, Elisabet, "Information packaging in HPSG,Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science" 1-31, 1996

    8 Silverstein, "Hierarchy of features and ergativity Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages ed by by Robert M" Humanities Press 112-171, 1976

    9 Dekker, "Files in focus Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches ed University of Edinburgh" 29-37, 1994

    10 Du Bois,John, "Discourse and grammar" 2001

    11 Walker, Marilyn, "Centering Theory in Discourse" and Ellen Prince Oxford University Press 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-01 학회명변경 영문명 :   -> The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea KCI등재
    2014-01-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Discourse and Cognition KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 -> 담화·인지언어학회
    영문명 : 미등록 ->  
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-04-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 담화와 인지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.49 0.53 0.841 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼