RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의 연고,온정주의형 부패의 특징에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Characteristics of Ingroup Favoritism,Paternalism of Corruption in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75595147

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Ingroup favoritism and paternalism have been known as latent factors of corruptions as well as soil of corruptions. This study investigates the characteristics of corruptions that are caused by ingroup favoritism and paternalism in Korea. Assuming that such cultural factors would intervene into any decision making situations, we focused on 4 factors that would lead to a corruptive decision: they were `personal factor`, `decision-making structural factor`, `relationship structural factor`, and `environmental factor`. Through in-depth case studies, several characteristics of corruptions that were related to ingroup favoritism and paternalism were emerged. First, Korean public officials did not to perceive that a decision based on ingroup favoritism and paternalism might lead to corruption. Second, it was likely that a chain of corruption got extended and tightened by such cultural factors. Third, it was difficult to get corruption exposed and caught when such factors led to corruptions. Fourth, when cultural factors intervened into a decision making, discretion was exercised as much as possible. Fifth, punishment of corruption behaviors tended to be weak particularly in power-elite related corruptions. And finally, occupational ties were also important factors of corruptions like well-known traditional ties such as regionalism, school relations, and kinship relations.
      번역하기

      Ingroup favoritism and paternalism have been known as latent factors of corruptions as well as soil of corruptions. This study investigates the characteristics of corruptions that are caused by ingroup favoritism and paternalism in Korea. Assuming tha...

      Ingroup favoritism and paternalism have been known as latent factors of corruptions as well as soil of corruptions. This study investigates the characteristics of corruptions that are caused by ingroup favoritism and paternalism in Korea. Assuming that such cultural factors would intervene into any decision making situations, we focused on 4 factors that would lead to a corruptive decision: they were `personal factor`, `decision-making structural factor`, `relationship structural factor`, and `environmental factor`. Through in-depth case studies, several characteristics of corruptions that were related to ingroup favoritism and paternalism were emerged. First, Korean public officials did not to perceive that a decision based on ingroup favoritism and paternalism might lead to corruption. Second, it was likely that a chain of corruption got extended and tightened by such cultural factors. Third, it was difficult to get corruption exposed and caught when such factors led to corruptions. Fourth, when cultural factors intervened into a decision making, discretion was exercised as much as possible. Fifth, punishment of corruption behaviors tended to be weak particularly in power-elite related corruptions. And finally, occupational ties were also important factors of corruptions like well-known traditional ties such as regionalism, school relations, and kinship relations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.81 0.81 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.69 1.16 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼